I don’t get it, where was Android they are clearly a bigger threat than RIM. Why are they being so cocky when they have yet to prove anything. This may go down has a huge embarrassment for Microsoft next year, but I tend to think they will be embarrassed by this long before then.
Month: September 2010
-
Here’s a Reason to Switch to a Mac
Stefan Worthmuller talking about DLL hell on Windows:
Installers of programs overwrote existing versions of DLLs, leading to the first iteration of DLL-Hell: Installing an application could possibly break other applications (because they were build for a different “version” of the DLL). And even worse, uninstalling an application could remove some DLLs that other applications depended on. Most applications installed their DLLs in the system directory (and many still do) in hope to share them with other programs but there was no way to keep two different versions of a DLL in the system folder as the file name usually remained unchanged.
-
Sean Parker
David Kirkpatrick talking about Parker’s youth:
The teenager had been sitting in the family den, all night, drilling deeply into the bowels of a Fortune 500 company, which he refuses to name. Back then he had a hobby, he says, of hacking into different sorts of organizations, keeping a file of .com, .edu, .mil, and .gov Internet domains he had penetrated in various countries around the world. His goal was to break into one of each type in a laundry list of countries. He claims that once inside he usually alerted the system administrator—from his or her own e-mail—to vulnerabilities he had discovered.
A great read.
[via I am pretty sure I saw this in John Gruber’s Starred Instapaper items. Just add him as ‘gruber’ on Instapaper.] -
Twitter for iPad – Extended Look
There has been a lot of mixed feelings about the new Twitter for iPad app, and I have really neglected to write anything because I didn’t really know where I stood until now. Listening to the latest episode of The Talk Show with Dan Benjamin and John Gruber I really started to become annoyed with how they were talking about Twitter for the iPad (I completely agree about their thoughts on Tweetie for Mac).
The UI
Yes, the UI is nothing short of different bordering on crazy. When I first started using it (in landscape mode) I was really annoyed that the right 2 inches of the screen is nothingness. Then I clicked on a tweet and it all made sense, a sliding columnar view – OK I get it. Much like Instapaper and Kindle or iBooks, Twitter for iPad really shines in Portrait orientation.
What irks many people is that the sliding interface seems to odd, making the entire app feel wrong. There is also much criticism over the new tweet field, Milind Alvares nails the problem:
My only problem with the compose window UI, is the freakin thing is so narrow, you can hardly type something without it overflowing from the view. Not just that. The actions are floating inside the window, so if you’ve typed something long, you can’t see the character count unless you scroll to the bottom. There’s no reason that compose window needs to be so narrow, let along have the actions floating at the bottom. I hope this is fixed in the next release.
I agree and so do many others, but this is version 1, this is expected to have a few annoyances. Overall I think the UI is far better than every other Twitter app that the iPad has seen to date. If you are a multiple account user you will love it too, you don’t have to back out of the tweet stream to switch accounts, it is always sitting on the left side to flip between everything.
The Best an iPad can get.
Twitter for iPad is without a doubt the best Twitter client available on the iPad ((Yes I have used Twitterrific, and no it is not that great.)) I have several Twitter accounts but only two of which I regularly check (@benjaminbrooks and @brooksreview) with all the others I have tried this was a pain. Twitter for iPad fits perfectly with how I use Twitter and perhaps that is the real crux of the issue. Twitter for iPad is not as universal as the iPhone version is, meaning it is not for everyone.
One Major Annoyance
One thing that I find beyond annoying is the way that Twitter for iPad opens TwitPic (among other photo sharing options) pictures. I don’t need to see the entire damn website, just load the picture like almost all the other Twitter clients do. This is beyond annoying to me.
Version 1
In the end it is pertinent to remember this is the first app that Twitter has released for the iPad – which excites me. If this is how much they can do on their first try, then there is no telling just what they will be able to do with more time and feedback.
-
Daring Fireball-Style Linked List Plugin for WordPress
I had been using the plugin that Shawn mentions as well, I just switched the blog to this new plugin as it is much nicer. Also there may be some hiccups as I get adapted to it, so bear with me.
Also please note that in the RSS feed now when you see the Infinity symbol ∞ at the end of a post that is the permalink, and when you see it before the title of the post that means it is not a linked list post.
-
Nokia Makes The Same Mistake Again: Hires A Manager, Not A Product Visionary
Dan Frommer on Nokia’s new CEO:
Sounds like another suit, and not the dreamer that Nokia needs to beat Apple and Google.
-
OmniFocus: Why You Don’t Need All 3 Versions
Earlier this week something odd happened, my Father came to me asking if he should pick Things or OmniFocus for task management. Naturally I recommended OmniFocus, but I quickly warned him to take price into consideration. If you were to buy the Mac client, iPhone app and iPad app of OmniFocus you would spend a grand total of $139.97, before any of your local taxes. That is no small chunk of change.
That’s when the wild notion hit me; maybe you don’t really need to buy all three versions. I already knew that I could get by with just one version of OmniFocus, I have done it in the past when on vacation, but what I really wanted to know is how I use each version of OmniFocus. To figure that out I decided to pay very close attention to what I do in each version over the past 3 days, what I found out surprised me a bit.
OmniFocus for Mac
The Mac version costs a whopping $79.99, so this is the easiest one to save some real money on. What I found is that I use the quick entry panel the most out of all the other features on the Mac version, I use Quick Entry about 3-4 times during the day. The rest of the time I only used to OmniFocus for the Mac to reschedule tasks.
Honestly over the past three days I have only used the Mac version of OmniFocus to entry a few tasks and reschedule a few tasks, nothing else. This is astounding to me, given that it was just under a year ago that I spent at least an hour a day using the program.
OmniFocus for iPhone
The iPhone version comes in at a high price (for an iPhone app) of $19.99 and is the cheapest of all three. Being around now since just shortly after Apple allowed 3rd party apps I have gotten quite used to using OmniFocus for the iPhone.
Over the past three days my usage has been quite a bit on the iPhone. The two main things I do with the iPhone version are: quick entry of new action items, and viewing of what I need to do. The iPhone in GTD terms is my ubiquitous capture tool, it is where 9/10 times I will input actions items that are on my mind. Due to this my iPhone with OmniFocus has become a very valuable tool in my proverbial tool bag.
OmniFocus for iPad
Weighing in at $39.99 for the app, OmniFocus again pushes the upper echelon ((What a fun word to say.)) for iPad app pricing. Over three days of monitoring I have found that I use the iPad version to do the following things: view what needs to be done, check off completed items, filter items added to the inbox (set the context, project and due date), organize the rest of my actions.
In other words out of all three of the apps I use the iPad app the most. As I have mentioned before I really love the forecast view that the iPad app offers, it is by far the best way to see what you need to do and when they need to be done. More than that the way the new action window / editing actions window is setup is by far the best and easiest way to assign contexts, projects and due dates to your actions items.
Assigning this data to actions is by far faster on the Mac, but once I get to work I usually won’t process new actions items. I usually will only process actions items when I wake up, and at night before I go to bed, making the iPad app even more of an optimal experience even if it takes a bit longer to accomplish.
Save Yourself $99
If like many people out there right now you are trying to figure out if OmniFocus is right for you, save yourself $99.98 and just buy the iPad app to begin with. You can do everything you can on all the other versions and it is by far the best version of OmniFocus. If after a bit you find that you have really taken to OmniFocus (and you will) go get the iPhone app for another $19.99. ((Don’t worry OmniFocus will sync without the Mac client in the mix.))
At this point I know that I could get by without the Mac app. Not everyone has all three devices, but if you do I don’t see a compelling reason right now to buy the Mac version of OmniFocus. Unless of course you have $79.99 kicking around that you want to part with.
-
HDR Video
Now this is very neat, I could see this being a new effect in movies.
-
Parallels Desktop 6 for Mac
I use it everyday, and every update is faster and better than the last.
-
MG Siegler on the Openess of Android
I thought the Randy Savage videos I found today were awesome, then I read this from MG Siegler about Android being open:
Instead, open is proving to mean that the carriers can choose what they want to do with Android.
and:
What happens when Verizon won’t update your phone to the latest greatest Android software — not because they can’t, but because they want you to upgrade to a new piece of hardware and sign the new two-year agreement that comes along with it? The game remains the same.
and lastly:
“Open” is great until you have to define it or defend it. I’m not sure Google can continue to do either in this situation.
-
Where is the White iPhone 4?
John Gruber making observations about Apple’s iPod event from last week:
THE WHITE IPHONE 4
Not even mentioned, let alone shipped. Embarrassing.
I had forgotten about this, but yeah that does suck (I really wanted a white one).
-
Knowing is Half the Battle: Apple Releases New Review Guidelines for iOS Apps
You can’t see them unless you are a registered iOS developer, however John Gruber has done an excellent job recapping it. Take a look at the points that he calls ‘interesting ones’.
Of note Apple is flat out saying that if your app is crap they will reject it, likewise if it is the same as 10,000 other apps without improving upon them. Really interesting is that the higher the price the more time they spend on it, which from a consumer stand point is really great.
-
AT&T Has a Lot of Work to Do and Has Done a Lot Already
A bunch of great quotes that TechFlash got from the AT&T President for the West Region Fred Devereux, here are some of my favorites:
Nationwide, the company is spending $18-$19 billion on wireless and wireline improvements this year, a 5-10 percent increase over last year.
“Of the four major carriers in the U.S., we carry half of the mobile data traffic,” he said.
-
Calendar Apps Suck, Here Are My Suggestions
I would guess that most of us use a calendar tool of some sort, maybe you stick to paper calendars, but if you read this blog I would guess you use a digital calendar of some sort. The problem with digital calendars though is that they all suck, at least all the ones that I have tried.
The user interface of most calendar apps is set to mimic old day planners, failing to take advantage of the dynamic digital interface that is at their disposal. Further most digital calendars exist in their own bubble, much like PCs before networking was standard, no calendar program talks to the other (unless you have an expensive Exchange or iCal Server setup, which most people don’t and even then you are restricted to those using your server).
I spent a good three hours today driving around to and from various appointments, this gave me way too much time to ponder about the state of digital calendars. Luckily (for whom I don’t know) I came up with some ideas on how to fix calendar apps.
Getting Rid of Simulated Paper Views
First things first, all calendars suck at showing the data that we store in them. Who wants to see 30 boxes arranged in a grid with tiny text? Who wants to see only what they need to do today? Who needs to see the past days of the week when you use a week view? I would guess that for most of you these views are mostly useless, most useless is the seemingly more popular ‘list view’ where you get a list of upcoming events with times. Yeah, that isn’t very helpful in spatially planning your time, now is it?
Here is what my iCal looks like in the view I always look at it in, week view:

Here is the same view on the iPad:

And lastly the day view on the iPhone (because all the other view options suck):

Can anyone honestly tell me that those views work perfectly for them? Because I think they suck, actually I think they really suck.
Here is how I would like to see it (click for larger view):
You get ‘today’ a bit larger than the rest, since it is the most pertinent. You see the next three days, as I don’t plan a whole lot much more in advance, nor do I need to worry about it sooner than a fews days away. My reasoning for three days is so that on Friday you would be able to see Monday’s events in the view, thus helping those of us that work M-F. Additionally this doesn’t show you the past days, because really how often do you need to refer to your calendar to see what you did yesterday?
Additionally I used one column to show a list view of upcoming events. The idea behind adding this list view (even though I hate list views) is to help people see just how busy they are coming up, and as a quick point of reference when you are on the phone planning a meeting. If you are on the phone you wouldn’t have to switch from the current week to see your upcoming schedule instead you get an idea of what is going on and can click a link to add a future event.
I think this would be pretty sweet, but that may just be me.
Time to get Calendars Networked
I despise the refusal that calendar app creators have when it comes to getting all the clients talking to one another. Yes you can ‘invite’ someone to a meeting, but that is it. Unless you have iCal Server or Exchange you can’t see when they are free, or do a search for next available time everyone I want to invite has. It is 2010 and we have yet to figure proper scheduling, instead we waste time sending around 50 emails with 100 people CC’d and hitting reply all to figure out that everyone is free on Tuesday at 10.
Have you ever used iCal to invite someone to an event? Have you? It sucks. If the other person is using a Mac (which is not guaranteed) they get the option of Accepting or Declining. So if you happened to invite them when they are not free all the can do is decline, leaving you wondering if they don’t want to meet or if you just picked a bad time. If they are a Windows Outlook user forget about it, rarely does it work – often they have to manually reply.
If I send out an invite to three people all using Macs (let’s not ask for too much here) I should be able to immediately get automated responses letting me know if that person is not free, and if they are busy the computer should suggest 3 other times I can pick from that works for everyone – all without the end user ever having to see the request, yet. Once a time that works for everyone is seen we should then be asked if we want to attend, and given the option to add a custom response in – that way the communication is kept clear.
Why is it that I can’t attach a meeting agenda to the invite? That seems stupid, and trivial to do. Come on, I mean is anybody really trying to make a decent calendar program because I really get the feeling that I must be the only using a calendar at times.
Home Scheduling
Right now my household is just my Wife and I, and I can’t imagine how bad it will be scheduling things later in life when we add kids to the mix. Why is it that we can only subscribe to each others calendars? Why isn’t there just an option to make an event a ‘joint event’ where by one of us creates the event and it is automatically added to both our calendars, no acceptance needed. It would also immediately give an overlay of my calendar on hers when she goes to add a joint event so she can see if I am free (and vice versa).
Right now if we want to do something like this we have to use shared calendars (to make sure we are both free) and then invite each other to the events. How 1999 is that? Sure there are other web based options, but none that my Wife really wants to be using, if you want my wife to use it then it needs to be made super easy.
I’m Busy
I would also like to set times where the calendar app knows that I am busy (e.g. After 5pm before 7am and on weekends and holidays) and if I get an invitation during those times it is automatically declined with my pre-typed reason as to why. This is a tiny thing, but time savers like this really add up and keep you focused.
Location Aware
I figured we better hit on the hot topic of late, and I wonder why calendar apps don’t seem to know where things are. By that I don’t mean that they should know when I am at a particular place, but where things are in relation to one another. For instance if I set a meeting at 8a in Seattle, WA and another at 10a in Portland, OR shouldn’t my calendar program be smart enough to know that this is impossible. That is a 3+ hour drive, no way I can make it to both meetings.
I would like to see calendaring programs that take into account drive times. What if you could set a meeting to start at 10a, but remind you at 9:30a and block out the 15 minutes before the meeting as the needed travel time. How cool would that be? Then when you get an invite using the new invite system I devised above, the computer would be able to tell if that time is available and if you would even have time to get from one place to another. This is in the realm of possibility, so why isn’t any one doing it?
Money
As we all know this comes down to money, who wants to pay $50 for a good calendar app? I know I would, and a handful of others probably would, but enough people to make the product profitable? That is the real question, and the only way to find out is to try.
-
Om Malik Thinks Oracle is trying to Distract HP
Malik:
Chaos at HP essentially helps Oracle.
Sound theory, and I wouldn’t put it past Ellison to try something like this.
-
The Ultimate Ellison Response to the HP Lawsuit
Quentin Hardy of Forbes speculates on a possible Oracle acquisition of Dell, which is really interesting. What I know about Ellison is that without a doubt he loves taking over companies, especially when they start to resist. This would make for a great story if Oracle buys Dell and inserts Hurd as the CEO.
[via DF] -
8 Common Dishwasher Mistakes
#8 is duly noted, who knew.
-
Archos 101 Android Tablet
Charlie Sorrel:
We don’t have any reports on the power use, but apparently the scaled-up cellphone interface doesn’t work so well.
Gee who would have thought.
-
Oracle Responds to HP Lawsuit
Oracle via a press release:
“Oracle has long viewed HP as an important partner,” said Oracle CEO Larry Ellison. “By filing this vindictive lawsuit against Oracle and Mark Hurd, the HP board is acting with utter disregard for that partnership, our joint customers, and their own shareholders and employees. The HP Board is making it virtually impossible for Oracle and HP to continue to cooperate and work together in the IT marketplace.”
Here is how I read this, “back off, we (whereby ‘we’ I mean me, Larry Ellison) is bigger and more powerful than you. This is going to be so good, I am glad Oracle responded, this is going to be great.
[via DF]
