Footnotes

Over the past couple of weeks you have probably [read about the em dash](http://www.slate.com/id/2295413/) — I’m not giving it up — and [about logical punctuation](http://www.slate.com/id/2293056/). Those two posts address a lot of the grammar complaints I get on the blog — and rightfully so. The one complaint left (besides spelling) that I get a lot,…

Over the past couple of weeks you have probably [read about the em dash](http://www.slate.com/id/2295413/) — I’m not giving it up — and [about logical punctuation](http://www.slate.com/id/2293056/). Those two posts address a lot of the grammar complaints I get on the blog — and rightfully so. The one complaint left (besides spelling) that I get a lot, is also one of the first complaints I received: footnotes.

I know how footnotes are *supposed* to work, but I choose to ignore all rules on them. I use footnotes as I see fit.

Sometimes that means that I write asides in footnotes, sometimes I make disclaimers, sometimes I just write odd weird things. None of that really matters, what does matter is this: I try to write all footnotes so that the reader loses nothing if they don’t read my footnotes.

So if my footnoting annoys you, you *should* be fine if you just skip past them.

This website makes use of affiliate links whenever possible, these links may earn the site money by clicking them.


Discover more from The Brooks Review

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.