Month: October 2011

  • The Carrier Question

    Great, quick, overview by MG Siegler of what choosing each of the iPhone carriers likely means. I didn’t realize that AT&T was the only carrier that has the full 14.4 speed network that the new iPhone can do (at least they are for now).

  • It’s Cheaper to Change Carriers for AT&T iPhone 4 Users, Than Upgrade to the iPhone 4S on AT&T

    As soon as I could check availability pricing for the new iPhone 4S, I checked. I am not eligible, in fact here’s my pricing break down:

    I don’t normally complain about such things on TBR — typically I reserve those complaints for Twitter — but in this case it seems to be a very odd problem, one that many users are facing, and a first for AT&T.

    ### Bit of Background

    I purchased the first iPhone on day one and before that had been a loyal AT&T customer since I was in seventh grade (over ten years ago). I am, for the lack of a better term, the perfect AT&T customer. It costs them nothing to keep me.

    AT&T has given me upgrade pricing for every model of the iPhone I have purchased after that first phone (3G, 3GS, 4), and I have been loyal because of it.

    ### The Big Problem

    For the very first time I am actually considering buying an iPhone fully unlocked and getting out of all of my contracts with wireless carriers — mainly because they all suck.

    It will set me back $649 to get the 64GB iPhone 4S — the one I want. I can afford it, but why does it cost my wife — who is also on AT&T (family plan, not the primary number) and who also bought an iPhone 4 on day one — only $399 for the same model?

    The solution, for me, is easy: buy the new iPhone under my wife’s plan and move it to mine. A bit of a hassle, but substantially cheaper.

    However, since complaining about this on Twitter I have received a ton of responses which all say a similar thing.

    It seems, for most people, that purchased the iPhone 4 on day one it would actually be cheaper for them to buy a new iPhone 4S on another network (Verizon, usually) and pay the AT&T cancellation fee. These people (myself included) would save — at a minimum — $50.

    Let’s just state this again: for many others and for me, it is $50 **cheaper** to break the AT&T contract and switch to another carrier.

    *Wow*.

    The idiocy of wireless carriers has reached a new low.

    ### Options

    Here are a few options that you may want to consider to try and get the upgrade pricing (this applies to AT&T customers, as I have never been a customer of another network):

    – Using a plan of a family member to buy your new phone. This only works if they like hand me down iPhones, or have no interest in buying a new phone for a couple more years.
    – Call AT&T and ask for the upgrade pricing. Threatening to leave to another carrier if they do not relent. This works in many cases, but not in all cases. You need to be courteous, but adamant — fine line and all.
    – Change your account to a Family Plan and add a new line, using that line to buy the iPhone 4S at the upgrade price. I have been on one so long I can’t say for sure if this is a better deal, but it is an option. Do the math first. The fringe benefit here is that you should always then be able to buy a new phone at an upgrade price — I emphasize “should” here.
    – Actually switch carriers.

    ### Why This is Odd

    Up and until this iPhone, AT&T has been fantastic about allowing existing iPhone users to upgrade at the upgrade price levels on day one. This has likely kept many customers on their network, after all why leave and pay a termination fee?

    Now, with two competitors getting the hottest phone in the country, AT&T decides that it is time to start screwing with (perhaps) their most loyal customers. That’s odd.

    *(Note about Verizon: I didn’t think Verizon customers would get the pricing, since they — unlike AT&T users — haven’t had the phone for over a year yet. It seems that in my informal Twitter poll, this is the case: no upgrade pricing for iPhone 4 Verizon customers. Likely, it would be cheaper for Verizon customers to switch networks also. Odd stuff.)*

  • HowTo: Setup Secure and Private Facebook Browsing

    Nik Cubrilovic has another post that I missed about how to setup up a secure system for browsing if you are a Facebook user. He breaks it into three steps, each of which have several sub-steps.

    I it still recommended by the TBR staff ((Which is just me.)) that you don’t use Facebook. The benefits (what ever you convince yourself they are) do not out weigh the eventual consequences. ((If you disagree, then so be it.))

  • Facebook Re-Enables Controversial Tracking Cookie

    Nik Cubrilovic on a Facebook cookie that tracks you, even if you are not a Facebook user:
    >The cookie was being set even if the user had never been to the Facebook site, and even if they didn’t click a ‘like’ or ‘share’ button.

    Damned good reason to never pollute your site with a Facebook button. ((I am contemplating the removal of the Tweet button on this site.)) It was present on my computer…

  • The Apple Social Network

    It sure seems like Apple now has a social network:

    – Music: Ping
    – Gaming: Game Center
    – Updates: Twitter?
    – DM/IM: iMessage
    – Video Chat: FaceTime
    – Location: Family and Friends
    – Photos: Instagram?
    – Email: @me.com
    – LinkedIN: No, thankfully.

    The point? At the end of the day Apple already has a social network that works vastly different than any other out there. Interestingly enough: you don’t really have to “join” any part of it, you just sign in with your Apple ID and go.

  • iPhone 4S – the Most Amazing iPhone Yet.

    New, illogical name. Same look with some amazing features. Notably an amazing camera, and the Siri assistant. You are going to want the 64GB model this time around.

  • ‘Alright, Fine, I’ll Add a Disclaimer to My Emails.’

    I am probably going to append this to the very next email I send to an attorney, or anyone else with a legal disclaimer — especially if my reply is one word.

    [via Coudal]
  • Patent Troll Says Anyone Using WiFi Infringes

    Mike Masnick reporting:
    >The Patent Examiner blog has the incredible story of Innovatio IP, a patent troll that recently acquired a portfolio of patents that its lawyers (what, you think there are any employees?) appear to believe cover pretty much any WiFi implementation.

    Be sure to read the comments from the lawyers, they are — uh — amazing. In related news I am close to buying the patent for standing while urinating — though I only plan on enforcing it at stadiums for right now.

  • The Sprint Deal

    Horace Dediu with a great analysis of why the Sprint deal isn’t crazy:
    >If anything the riskiest thing for Sprint would have been not to do the deal at all.

  • Mac App Store in the Growl

    I have been using Growl for so long that I forget it’s not a part of OS X by default. Now in the Mac App Store with a real business model. ((Selling the app for $1.99.))

  • Walmart and T-Mobile Introduce Exclusive No-Annual Contract 4G Offering

    Business Wire:
    >With increased consumer demand for both no-annual contract wireless plans and faster data speeds, Walmart and T-Mobile USA, Inc. announced today that T-Mobile will launch a $30 unlimited web and text monthly 4G prepaid service plan — providing customers great value on a no-annual contract 4G data offering.

    That’s a clever move by T-Mobile. (Note that “unlimited” here actually means 5GB.)

  • Adobe’s Mobile Push

    Six touch based apps and 20GB of free “cloud” storage. Photoshop touch looks nice.

  • ‘Polish’

    Speaking of the simple formula Apple uses, here’s Clayton Morris’ take:

    >Polish is what Apple does, showing us something we’ve seen before in a new light.

    He was responding to the notion that Apple needs to “bring sexy back” — a notion that is absurd.

  • iPhone’s Disproportionate Use

    Fascinating data from Luke Wroblewski on iPhone usage. Don’t read this as someone trying to state why the iPhone is better, because this is showing how users are using the devices differently.

    Anecdotally in my day to day observation of western Washington I have noticed that I typically only ever see BlackBerry users and iPhone users with their phones out being used to pass the time. Mostly I just see Android users using the phones to make calls.

    For whatever reason, it seems to me, that iPhone users just enjoy using their iPhones as more than just phones.

  • Adobe Acquires Web Typography Innovator Typekit

    I can’t say that, as a user of the service, I feel confident this is a good thing for Typekit.

    **UPDATED** (on Oct 3, 2011): Typekit now has a [post up on their blog](http://blog.typekit.com/2011/10/03/adobe-acquires-typekit/) about it. The team is staying together (that’s good) and Typekit says that they will remain “a standalone product”, whatever that means (it doesn’t necessarily mean and independent company.

    The good is that Typekit gets tons of cash, the bad is that it is coming from a company that makes seriously impressive products that have seriously confusing interfaces — also they make Flash. If Typekit can remain independent and just use the money as they want, this is nothing but a win. *If.*

  • Quote of the Day: David DiSalvo

    “Monolithic, inflexible and unable to keep up with the shifts and turns of disruptive technology, once great companies like Kodak can’t survive without exhaustive restructuring.”
  • A Simple Formula

    Tom Simonite with an incredibly accurate view on how Apple makes amazing new products:
    >The formula is simple: take a bunch of neat technology that has never lived up to its promise, rethink what it’s for, do some secretive hard work, and then release a natural, retrospectively obvious experience that redefines what computers can do.

    It’s the last bit of that sentence that Apple has done extremely well with in recent years.

    Simonite also, on page 2, has a great little thought about the rumored “Assistant” voice control:

    >I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that Apple gets a cut of anything sold through Assistant, whether movie tickets or restaurant bookings.

    I would be surprised if they did, unless of course Apple was providing some sort of back end support — meaning Apple builds the tools you need to integrate support for Assistant into your product, not the other way around.

  • iOS vs. Microsoft: Comparing the Bottom Lines

    Horace Dediu analyzing iOS and Microsoft:
    >Microsoft invented the software business and built it to become the world’s most valuable business by the year 2000. It’s still been growing since and after 35 years it is reaching a profit of $27 billion per year. It did this while maintaining enormous margins and a highly disruptive monopoly business model the likes of which the world had never seen before.

    >It is scarcely believable then that a device business has been created to overtake it in four years.

    You should really take a look at the entire post, it is amazing to see just how big iOS has become in such a (very) short time.

  • Facebook Sued Over Tracking Users After Logout

    Elinor Mills reporting on Facebooks response to the lawsuit:
    >”We believe this complaint is without merit and we will fight it vigorously,” Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes told CNET in an e-mailed statement.

    I know I rag on Facebook a lot, but if you aren’t up in arms about this you really should be. If Facebook gets away with this the flood gates will open — and no one should want that.