‘Big Transparency for the NSA’

[Smart argument from Timothy Edgar on the NSA spying programs][1]: > Where the government sees three branches of government working together in harmony, the public sees a disturbing pattern of secret law and secret government accompanied by demands to “trust us, we are keeping you safe.” Secret checks and balances appear to be nothing more…

[Smart argument from Timothy Edgar on the NSA spying programs][1]:

> Where the government sees three branches of government working together in harmony, the public sees a disturbing pattern of secret law and secret government accompanied by demands to “trust us, we are keeping you safe.” Secret checks and balances appear to be nothing more than a pale shadow of our constitutional design.

Edgar’s been on both sides — working as in-house council for Bush, and for the ACLU — he knows what he is talking about. I still don’t think we have the full truth, I still think the spying is wrong, and I still think open debate is needed.

That said, I do *believe* that the government at large is *trying* to act in the best interest of United States citizens — it’s just that their actions look misguided, unless thoroughly explained.

[1]: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323309404578617463152440542.html?mod=hp_opinion

This website makes use of affiliate links whenever possible, these links may earn the site money by clicking them.


Discover more from The Brooks Review

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.