Author: Ben Brooks

[Brett Terpstra on tagging in Mavericks][1]:

> Offering a universal system that allows files to pass seamlessly from one app to another and be organized in more powerful ways is not just a nice gesture, it’s integral to killing off our current file-in-folder mindset.

I scoffed at tagging until I read Brett’s post — he makes some great points. I’ve never been a big fan of tagging, but I think if you fully commit to tagging and spend a couple weeks reorganizing your filesystem, you are probably better off in the long run — this seems to be the direction Apple is taking.

I don’t use many folders and I truly don’t tag, I just find things by search, but more and more finding by search without some kind of “thing” to immediately tone down the results, is getting hard. I’m giving tagging a go.

[1]: http://brettterpstra.com/2013/07/28/mavericks-and-tagging/

[Glenn Greenwald via Kari Rea on George Stephanopoulos’ show][1]:

> And what these programs are, are very simple screens, like the ones that supermarket clerks or shipping and receiving clerks use, where all an analyst has to do is enter an email address or an IP address, and it does two things.  It searches that database and lets them listen to the calls or read the emails of everything that the NSA has stored, or look at the browsing histories or Google search terms that you’ve entered, and it also alerts them to any further activity that people connected to that email address or that IP address do in the future.

Two things:

1. This is getting down right crazy. The fact that Chambliss is trusting the NSA is just sad — I really just want someone to do a hardcore investigation related to everything the NSA is doing.
2. I *really* want to see a screenshot.

[1]: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/07/glenn-greenwald-low-level-nsa-analysts-have-powerful-and-invasive-search-tool/

[John Mutter][1]:

> Another possible reason for Amazon’s boldness is its apparently cozy relationship with the Obama administration–whose Justice Department pursued the agency model case, which mainly benefited Amazon. This relationship will be highlighted this coming Tuesday, when the president will give another major speech on the economy and aiding the middle class at, of all places, the Amazon warehouse in Chattanooga, Tenn. This is roughly equivalent of going to a Wal-Mart and calling for more of the kinds of jobs it offers.

Mutter also hits on some interesting tidbits that Amazon is doing to try and shutter its competition — by dropping their prices so low there’s no way anyone else (hell even Amazon) can make money.

[1]: http://shelf-awareness.com/booktrade.html

[David Kravets][1]:

> On Wednesday, the house voted 217 to 205 not to rein in the NSA’s phone-spying dragnet. It turns out that those 217 “no” voters received twice as much campaign financing from the defense and intelligence industry as the 205 “yes” voters.

Shocking? No. Nonetheless, disgusting? Yes.

[1]: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/money-nsa-vote/?utm_medium=App.net

[Natasha Singer on the idea behind this new agreement][1]:

> The code of conduct would require participating mobile app developers to show notices indicating whether their apps collected user-specific details in any of eight categories: biometrics, including fingerprints or facial recognition data; Web browsing history; logs of phone calls or texts made or received; contact list details like e-mail addresses or social network connections; financial information, like credit or banking data; health or medical data; precise location data; and stored text, video or photo files.

That’s great and all, but it’s probably the least effective solution. For it to work several things need to happen, not the least of which are:

1. The shady developers signing on;
2. Consumers stop downloading any apps that do *not* participate.
3. It becoming law.

None of those options are likely to happen if you ask me. What’s more likely is that the good developers sign up voluntarily and show that they have nothing to hide, while the [bad developers][2] siphon your entire fucking address book and do whatever they want and then say “BUGS! Oops!”. Congress may get around to changing the laws, but the laws will be a hacked apart mess that is irrelevant by the time the laws are invoked.

The real enforcement should come from Apple, Google, and Microsoft — in the form of kicking shady apps out. I feel like such a dialog should be a standard part of iOS that pops up to tell uses what data is being accessed — not ok boxes that are most easily dismissed by agreeing. No, a screen that Apple puts together, not the developers that blocks the entire interface for a few seconds before allowing you to proceed. Then again, me and like two other people, would be the only ones for that.

[1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/26/technology/under-code-apps-would-disclose-collection-of-data.html
[2]: http://gizmodo.com/5981041/did-path-screw-up-and-steal-your-data-again

[For a good laugh, Jonathan San’s ‘Microsoft Word Problems’][1]:

> 6. A college student, Mary, spends 307 hours writing her 35-page thesis paper, “Kafka on the Shore: An Existential Look at the Battle of Normandy.” But instead of choosing “save as,” she clicks “save,” filing her document in a mysterious temporary folder. To the nearest whole number, for how many seconds will Mary scream before beginning to cry?

[1]: http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/microsoft-word-problems

[Andy, at TorrentFreak has a rundown of sites that might be defaulted to “blocked” in the UK.][1] What’s most curious to me is how this may harm the elderly generations. For example: do you think your parents, or grandparents, would be able to find these checkboxes, know what they mean, and be able to turn them off?

Forget for a second trying to decide what should, and should not, be labeled porn — on second thought maybe don’t forget this. How in the hell is this system openly going to be allowed? This is nuts.

[1]: http://torrentfreak.com/uk-porn-filter-will-censor-other-content-too-isps-reveal-130726/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

[Allen Pike on how irrelevant iOS App Store search results are][1]:

> This might make some sort of sense for somebody new to the App Store, but for a person who’s trying to find a specific type of app it’s crazy-making. Suggesting Instagram when I search for Twitter is like suggesting Nickelback when I search for Said the Whale. It’s saying, “Not sure what that means, but statistically people like this thing.”

I cannot tell you how many times I hear about a new app, search for it *by name* and cannot find the app. Then, I drop out to Bing on my iPhone, find it there on the developer’s website, click the App Store link, and then buy it back in the App Store. I’ve always known how ridiculous that process is (especially given that I know the app name already), but having just typed out my process — well it’s making me pissed just thinking about it. What a stupid ass system, Apple.

[1]: http://www.allenpike.com/2013/searching-the-curatorium/

[Jeff Daniels’ character Will McAvoy in The Newsroom][1]:

> We reached for the stars, and we acted like men. We aspired to intelligence; we didn’t belittle it; it didn’t make us feel inferior.

My wife and I just started watching *The Newsroom* last night — it’s a fantastic show — and this monologue from the first episode is insanely great. Take the time to read the entire thing, I missed it when the show came out last year, but I suspect it hits even harder for Americans *this* year.

([Here’s the video][2] if you prefer to listen/watch.)

[1]: http://theriggs.tumblr.com/post/25829999353/jeff-daniels-monologue-from-the-newsroom
[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h__uutzcQXc

[Craig Mod suggesting changes to iMessage][1]:

> We all have an Apple ID. iMessage associated email addresses and phone numbers should sync around it. Let’s get rid of per-device settings. They just confuse everyone. The vast majority of us don’t need that much granularity.

He’s got a great list of suggestions, but I must be alone in the fact that I don’t seem to have issues with message histories. I will say: it’s stupid that iMessage doesn’t revolve around just one ID.

[1]: https://medium.com/how-to-use-the-internet/541a8e904119

[ Cliff Mass ][1]:

> A few days ago, a well known ratings group found Seattle to be the NUMBER ONE city in the U.S. for pleasant summer weather, while Portland followed in second place.  Even major newspapers like the Los Angeles Times seemed to agree.

Cliff Mass breaks down 9 reasons why Seattle has some of the best summer weather in the U.S., including:

> We have practically NO RAIN in the summer.  Really.  Seattle is drier than Phoenix in July. So you can enjoy perfect temperatures without the inconvenience of even thinking about an umbrella or rain gear.

Oddly enough I had been thinking about writing about the actual lack of rainfall in Seattle, but never got around to it. I did manage to put together this chart that shows the average rainfall amounts by month for a random selection of cities that I chose. It illustrates the above point very well.

[1]: http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2013/07/secret-revealed-northwest-has-best.html

[Evgeny Morozov in a great post about all the implications of the NSA and data privacy][1]:

> This is the real tragedy of America’s “Internet freedom agenda”: it’s going to be the dissidents in China and Iran who will pay for the hypocrisy that drove it from the very beginning. America has managed to advance its communications-related interests by claiming high moral ground and using ambiguous terms like “Internet freedom” to hide many profound contradictions in its own policies. On matters of “Internet freedom” – democracy promotion rebranded under a sexier name – American enjoyed some legitimacy as it claimed that it didn’t engage in the kinds of surveillance that it itself condemned in China or Iran. Likewise, on matters of cyberattacks, it could go after China’s cyber-espionage or Iran’s cyber-attacks because it assured the world that it engaged in neither.

This is a really long post, but it is the best summary of all the moving parts and issues they present that I have seen to date. Also, I do love this bit:

> Google could have easily chosen to encrypt our communications in a way that its own algorithms wouldn’t be able to decipher, depriving both itself and the NSA of much-coveted data. But then Google wouldn’t be able to offer us a free service. And who would be happy about this?

Morozov also draws a comparison to energy consumption which is a really good way of looking at digital privacy — that there are consequences we are just now learning about that are far reaching than we ever thought.

[1]: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/ueberwachung/information-consumerism-the-price-of-hypocrisy-12292374.html?utm_medium=App.net&utm_source=PourOver

[Justin Elliott][1]:

> But ask the NSA, as part of a freedom of information request, to do a seemingly simple search of its own employees’ email? The agency says it doesn’t have the technology.

I call *bullshit*.

[1]: http://www.propublica.org/article/nsa-says-it-cant-search-own-emails?utm_medium=App.net&utm_source=PourOver

[Rhett Allain on battery life and browser tabs — specifically how many do you have to have open to burn your battery to zero in 60 seconds][1]:

> With the same values as above and a time of 1 minute (1/60 hours), I get 24,000 tabs. That’s like having the whole internet open in your browser. Ha. Just kidding.

I can’t wait for [Dr. Drang][2] to refute some or all of this. It’s interesting, but logical, that you get diminishing returns on destroying your battery life with each subsequent tab you open.

I’ve never understood the ‘100s of tabs open’ crowd — what’s the point? If the browser crashes your screwed, and even if it doesn’t crash there is a clear hit on your computing performance. That’s what services like Pinboard.in and Instapaper were made to handle — it’s easy enough to shove those links over to those services, so why not do that?

I get nervous when I have more than four tabs open. (Remember the days before tabs, god that sucked.)

[1]: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/07/browser-tabs-and-battery-life/
[2]: http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/

[David Pozen][1]:

> More broadly, Snowden’s case may clash with certain foreign policy goals. The United States often wants other countries’ dissidents to be able to find refuge abroad; this is a longstanding plank of its human rights agenda. The United States also wants illiberal regimes to tolerate online expression that challenges their authority; this is the core of its developing Internet freedom agenda.

> Snowden’s prosecution may limit our soft power to lead and persuade in these areas. Of course, U.S. officials could emphasize that Snowden is different, that he’s not a courageous activist but a reckless criminal. But that is what the repressive governments say about their prisoners, too.

I know a lot of you are tired of this NSA stuff, but how to “deal” with Snowden is absolutely fascinating to think about. Every option that I see leaves the U.S. bruised in some way, as there seems to be no clear win-win scenario. Pozen’s article is a great read about some of the options for U.S. in dealing with Snowden.

[1]: http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/07/what-happens-when-we-actually-catch-edward-snowden/