Recent Articles

This is going to be an analysis, more than review, of one of the ‘hottest’ cameras to come out: the Fujifilm X-T1. It’s an analysis because this camera has been reviewed to death. That said, I wanted to share a few of my thoughts on this new camera and take a practical look at what type of person this is ideally suited for.

The Appetizer

Overall the camera feels absolutely great in my hand. The balance, grip, and size are very well done. It feels solid too, but also light weight. As far as handling, it is near perfect for me. I personally think the camera balances best with the heavier 23mm 1.4 lens on it, but the 35mm 1.4 makes for a really nice and light setup if weight is of concern.

The big draw of this camera is the fact that it has more manual dials on it for controlling camera settings. While it is rather overwhelming at first (a lot of what’s this, where’s that), within an hour or so of shooting I became very well accustomed to where and what each dial was — and in fact was really enjoying them.

I do have a few concerns on the button and dial front:

• The exposure compensation dial is difficult to turn with just your finger. This is nice because it won’t get as easily shifted as the X-E2 dial, but also hard to use if you want to hold your framing while adjusting it.
• The ISO dial is a welcome addition, but the dial is locking. Unlike the shutter dial it locks at every adjustment (the shutter only locks when in auto). So you cannot easily change the ISO on the fly. This is very annoying. Even though I have taken to using auto ISO (because the noise control on Fujifilm is excellent), I still wish I could easily spin that dial with one finger while the camera was up to my eye. ((Someone is crowd funding a little sticker to go over the top and keep the button depressed.))
• The 4-way buttons are atrocious. They are hard to press, mushy, and located very poorly. They are the single worst designed aspect of this camera.
• Once again the playback button is in an odd spot. I’d prefer it where the Q button is, or at the very least flipped spots with the trash button.

While I am trashing the camera a bit, there is also a rubber cover on the bottom that the grip connects to — yeah, that is going to get lost.

Ok, that’s the extent of my complaints — seriously — because I love everything else about this camera. It is very fast, handles exceedingly well, and the quality is excellent (just as the X-E2 is). And that viewfinder is to die for, but you’ve read about that before.

The Meat

The big question I had about this camera is where it fits. That is, who should buy this camera? After using it for a week I came to the conclusion that this is a camera I would absolutely love to own, but not one that I would be likely to carry around as much as I do the X-E2 (which goes almost everywhere with me). While the two cameras are almost physically the same size, the addition of the viewfinder hump makes the X-T1 just too unwieldily as an everyday carry. It’s the change that moves the body from ‘kind of svelte’, to ‘you’re not stashing this away’.

This is a camera that you purposefully choose to carry. When you get into that realm you start talking about Sony A7s, Olympus E-M1s, and of course all of your traditional dSLRs. That’s a huge market, and one that I am not going to tackle.

Instead, I look at this camera a lot like a prosumer dSLR — and in that light how does the X-T1 stack up?

I am a big Canon guy, so for me if I was looking to own an X-T1 I would also be comparing it with a Canon. Which brings into consideration the 5D MKIII, 6D, or 7D cameras from Canon — the price difference alone on some of these makes the decision easily in Fuji’s favor. But let’s ignore price for this.

For me the real question here is whether the X-T1 would be a good option for someone to buy instead of one of those Canons listed above. These are cameras that are a bit too large to carry all the time, and yet are serious about taking pictures. The Canon’s across the board will take better video — not even close — so I want to caveat that now.

The X-T1, then, offers something that the Canon lineup cannot: fun.

I shot for many years with a Canon 5D, and I can tell you that I never enjoyed shooting with the 5D as much as I have with the X-T1. Canon’s are made for you to trust the camera, and the X-T1 seems to love you even more when you flip to manual and stop trusting it.

The Canon wants to do things for you, whereas the Fuji wants you to take charge.

It’s almost like the difference in car gearboxes. Point and shoots are all automatics for the most part, and SLRs used to be the manuals. That’s shifted, where now I see most dSLRs (certainly the ones I mentioned) as more of the sequential-manual gearboxes (the flappy paddle gearboxes as Top Gear would say). That is, you can still mostly control everything, but there’s a purposeful computer there to make sure you do it right. In that sense the X-T1 truly can be a manual transmission. It’s fun because you can make mistakes with it, but also because when you get it right, you really get it right and there’s a wonderful sense of perfect harmony there.

Yes the sensors are bigger on some of those Canons, but I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that you will enjoy taking pictures more with the X-T1 than with any of those Canons.

Unless you are faced with the most demanding of situations for cameras (either sports, weather, or needing as much image quality as possible) then I don’t see how the X-T1 isn’t the better tool.

It’s more fun, it’s smaller, and it’s cheaper.

The Dessert

We’ve come to a point with cameras where the image quality of the top of the line cameras is so good, that the sensor sizes are mattering less and less. The E-M1, X-T1, A7 cameras all offer superb image quality. You’d have to really look to find issues in any of them for most any shooting circumstance.

This is excellent news for anyone who loves cameras, because that tech will not only trickle down, but it means you can just buy the camera that you like the best and rest assured it will serve you well even if you want to try and be a “pro” photographer some day.

I like the X-E2 better, but that is only because the sensor is the same as the X-T1.

Buy It

Buy it at Amazon, or B&H Photo and you help support the site.

Doug Mahoney had the unenviable job for The Sweethome to pick “The Best Utility Knife.” I have a huge issue with his pick: it’s a folding utility knife. Yuck.

To be fair, he does state:

To get the full range of use out of the knife and as much safety and portability as possible, we recommend going with the folding style over the retractable. They’re smaller to store, tend to come with belt hooks, and because of the way the folded blade nests in the body, there is a lower chance of their accidentally deploying in your pocket. Retractable knives are nice, but their feature set is more geared toward the professional tradesman.

If that’s your caveat, then you need your headline to read: “Best Household Utility Knife”, anything less is disingenuous and annoying to anyone who actual wants the best utility knife.

Now, you may wonder what my background here is, so let me tell you: my grandfather, and father, own and have run a construction company since he left the military in the early part of the 1970s. I had my first tool belt (not a toy one) when I was 6. From 16 to 23 years of age I worked all school holidays in the field of my father’s construction company. To this day, my office, is inside a construction company office.

Next to a tape measure, pencil, and hammer is where the utility knife stands in usefulness — It’s something every construction worker that is worth a damn carries. I know what I am talking about when I talk about utility knives because I used them day in and out for a very long time in very tough conditions. I’ve sliced my hand open a ton with them, and demolished a great many things with the help of them.

These folding utility knives aren’t good for much. Sure, you may think they are safer, they are smaller (when folded), and have a belt clip (really?), but they are worse than a “normal” utility knife in just about every task. ((I can’t think of a task they are better for, but I am sure there is one.)) They usually are less sturdy, less comfortable in your hand, and far more fiddly to open.

If you are worried about safety, but you still want a really good utility knife, then you buy this Stanley one. I have about six of them, and have had them forever. What’s not great is that if the blade gets gummed up you can’t retract it, and with too much force the blade may retract on its own. What is great is how grippy the handle is, how well they work, and the fact that they are seemingly indestructible. I’ve never had one accidentally open — so I think they are just as safe as those folding ones.

My favorite utility knife? This one for $6. It doesn’t retract, has a flat head screw (the philips ones always strip out) and stores blades. This thing is light, always ready, and even more indestructible than the retractable version. Even if you do destroy it… it was $6.

A lot of people don’t like non-retracting blades, and I get that, but this is the best utility knife you can buy — not those folding pieces of shit. ((Just to set the record straight.))