Top Posts

Leica Sofort 2June 13, 2024
Grand Seiko SBGX261February 23, 2023

Recent Articles

  • ‘NSA Collecting Phone Records of Millions of Verizon Customers Daily’

    The headline [pretty much says it all][1], but here’s Glenn Greenwald’s report: > The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing. And: > Under the terms…

    The headline [pretty much says it all][1], but here’s Glenn Greenwald’s report:

    > The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

    And:

    > Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

    The New York Times covers it a bit differently, with [Charlie Savage and Edward Wyatt reporting][2]:

    > The Obama administration is secretly carrying out a domestic surveillance program under which it is collecting business communications records involving Americans under a hotly debated section of the [Patriot Act][3], according to a [highly classified court order][4] disclosed on Wednesday night.

    The key difference between the two reports is that it sounds like The New York times believes the records to be only “business” in nature — those from a specific business subsidiary of Verizon — whereas The Gaurdian report seems to be claiming that there is a “business provision” in the Patriot Act which is being used to get all-ish records Verizon. That’s my reading at least.

    Either way, it’s fucking bullshit.

    [1]: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order
    [2]: %20http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/us/us-secretly-collecting-logs-of-business-calls.html?hp
    [3]: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/usa_patriot_act/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier
    [4]: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order

  • Why Paywalls and Big Media Don’t Work as Well as a Reasonable Person Might Assume that they Should Work

    Today the Washington Post [announced][1] that they will put up a Paywall. Of course [this][2] interests me, but not as a point of vindication — because I think the Washington Post will likely fail in their paywall foray. The problem with paywalls and big media is that big media lacks compelling content. The majority of…

    Today the Washington Post [announced][1] that they will put up a Paywall. Of course [this][2] interests me, but not as a point of vindication — because I think the Washington Post will likely fail in their paywall foray.

    The problem with paywalls and big media is that big media lacks compelling content. The majority of the content I find on the Washington Post is also content that I could find, like or, better versions of on another site for free. This is the paywall problem.

    A paywall only works if the content that exists behind the paywall, *only* exists behind the paywall.

    This is the core issue with any site that does a paywall, including this site. If all I continued to do when I put up the paywall was link to articles that every other tech blogger was linking to, adding only my own particular brand of snark — well in that scenario you have something that’s not really worth paying for. You can get those *same* links and *similar* snark from another ad-supported site — screw paying *this guy*.

    That’s the issue that faces The Washington Post.

    With the model as the Post described it, they must be outputting more than twenty compelling articles each month (first twenty articles are free) — and those articles that exist beyond the twenty must also be *worth* paying for. Because a good article is not something many are willing to pay for, your writing needs to then be so great, or so unique, that all of a sudden it *is* worth paying for.

    Essentially, news is out, and opinion is in. That means it’s not just twenty good news articles, it’s specifically *more than twenty good opinion* articles that need to be produced at the highest levels of “interestingness” before you can get people to pay. And I’m sorry, but I just don’t think the Washington Post can do it.

    That’s a huge wall to scale for the Post and a huge ask of their readership. When what you mostly write about can be found on just about any other news site people have a hard time paying for that content.

    [1]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/washington-post-to-phase-in-a-paid-online-subscription-model/2013/06/05/d2e1bce4-cdd4-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/members/

  • Eavesdropping

    [Bruce Schneier writing about the new backdoors that the FBI wants installed][1]: > The FBI believes it can have it both ways: that it can open systems to its eavesdropping, but keep them secure from anyone else’s eavesdropping. That’s just not possible. It’s impossible to build a communications system that allows the FBI surreptitious access…

    [Bruce Schneier writing about the new backdoors that the FBI wants installed][1]:

    > The FBI believes it can have it both ways: that it can open systems to its eavesdropping, but keep them secure from anyone else’s eavesdropping. That’s just not possible. It’s impossible to build a communications system that allows the FBI surreptitious access but doesn’t allow similar access by others. When it comes to security, we have two options: We can build our systems to be as secure as possible from eavesdropping, or we can deliberately weaken their security. We have to choose one or the other.

    A really good overview of the problems that surround eavesdropping via backdoors in software.

    [1]: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/the_problems_wi_3.html

  • Mac mini Server

    When I saw a deal offered by Macminicolo.net on *[Daring Fireball][1]*, I was interested. Then I found out the cost of entry could be reduced even further by “renting” a Mac mini instead of buying one. *Sold*. I went into this adventure with Macminicolo.net having never used a Mac server before, and in just a…

    When I saw a deal offered by Macminicolo.net on *[Daring Fireball][1]*, I was interested. Then I found out the cost of entry could be reduced even further by “renting” a Mac mini instead of buying one.

    *Sold*.

    I went into this adventure with Macminicolo.net having never used a Mac server before, and in just a night I had the following up and running:

    1. Hosting for Benbrooks.me
    2. Email for Benbrooks.me (Or so I thought. Turns out I was only half way there)
    3. A VPN to route all internet traffic through.

    Granted I found guides all over the web that were easy to find and fairly easy to follow.

    More advanced things required some guidance, which luckily was also readily available.

    At this point I decided that I wanted to try and port the hosting for Brooksreview.net over to the mini (Spoiler: that’s what is serving the site now.) and so I started following guides to get WordPress up and running. I found out that you don’t need MAMP, just MySQL installed — one less app running, but then I got a bit, well, *nervous*.

    Yes, I had an instance of WordPress up and running, but I suck at managing databases and I was worried about messing up the migration — especially losing my Mint stats… *again*.

    So I hired Rusty Ross to give me a hand getting everything else setup. And I’m glad I did because there are so many disastrous pitfalls that I would have tripped into had I not hired Rusty. [You should hire him][2].

    ## The Advantage

    There’s no practical reason I can think of to move from one of the many lower cost options to a Mac mini if all you want to do is to host some email and a website or four.

    The advantage to having the Mac mini is that I have a lot of control and a lot of flexibility.

    I can do the typical Mac server things like running Mail.app and having rules set up. Or running Torrents, or what have you. There’s a lot of things that I can do.

    What I am doing right now is:

    – [VPN][3] for use when I am not on a trusted network.
    – Running Mail.app so that my rules work all the time.
    – Synchronizing OmniFocus (which is a way faster solution).
    – Using the Transmission web interface should I need to download a Torrent.
    – Hosting all of my websites.
    – Hosting all of my email.
    – Using Scrup as my own personal Cloud.app.
    – Storing all of my Dropbox on it, while using Selective Sync on my Mac. (OwnCloud is great, but no apps support it, so there is limited iOS utility right now.)
    – Using BitTorrent sync for work files.

    I’ve only [scratched the surface][4] of what I can do. There are a lot more automated tasks that I will push to the mini in future.

    This little mini is really fantastic; fast to work with, and overall a better performing, more cost effective solution for my needs.

    [Go get one][5].

    [1]: http://daringfireball.net
    [2]: https://twitter.com/ConsultantRR
    [3]: http://macminicolo.net/mountainlionvpn
    [4]: http://www.farawaymac.com
    [5]: http://macminicolo.net

  • ‘Sent From Byword’

    [Shawn Blanc has a great write up on Byword 2][1]. I’ve actually been waiting to read his thoughts, since I know how much he loves and uses Byword. The ability to publish directly to your site from Byword is nothing short of a fantastic addition — I look forward to seeing how this develops. [1]:…

    [Shawn Blanc has a great write up on Byword 2][1]. I’ve actually been waiting to read his thoughts, since I know how much he loves and uses Byword.

    The ability to publish directly to your site from Byword is nothing short of a fantastic addition — I look forward to seeing how this develops.

    [1]: http://shawnblanc.net/2013/06/sent-from-byword/

  • The Banality of ‘Don’t Be Evil’

    [Julian Assange, reviewing Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen’s new book, *The New Digital Age*][1]: > The section on “repressive autocracies” describes, disapprovingly, various repressive surveillance measures: legislation to insert back doors into software to enable spying on citizens, monitoring of social networks and the collection of intelligence on entire populations. All of these are already…

    [Julian Assange, reviewing Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen’s new book, *The New Digital Age*][1]:

    > The section on “repressive autocracies” describes, disapprovingly, various repressive surveillance measures: legislation to insert back doors into software to enable spying on citizens, monitoring of social networks and the collection of intelligence on entire populations. All of these are already in widespread use in the United States. In fact, some of those measures — like the push to require every social-network profile to be linked to a real name — were spearheaded by Google itself.

    I almost always don’t like Assange, but the enemy of my enemy… Or something like that. In his review Assange brings up some fantastic points, like the one quoted above and this gem:

    > If you want a vision of the future, imagine Washington-backed Google Glasses strapped onto vacant human faces — forever.

    Gives me the heebie-jeebies.

    {via *[Daring Fireball][2]*}

    [1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/opinion/sunday/the-banality-of-googles-dont-be-evil.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
    [2]: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/06/03/assange-schmidt

  • Byword For iOS 2.0

    Today Byword 2.0 for iOS was released, and though I am not a Byword user it has one major new feature that makes the app a serious contender for my usage: publishing. Available as a $4.99 in-app purchase you can now publish directly to places like Tumblr and WordPress. This is a great addition and…

    Today Byword 2.0 for iOS was released, and though I am not a Byword user it has one major new feature that makes the app a serious contender for my usage: publishing. Available as a $4.99 in-app purchase you can now publish directly to places like Tumblr and WordPress.

    This is a great addition and something I very much hope more apps start to support.

    **Update**: I missed this at first, but the Mac app got the same publishing treatment. Very nice.

  • Quote of the Day: Marco Arment

    “It’s simply not worth it for this iOS developer to waste any time on an Android port. Your mileage may vary.” — Marco Arment

    “It’s simply not worth it for this iOS developer to waste any time on an Android port. Your mileage may vary.”
  • Felix for App.net (iPad Edition)

    I’ve been testing [Felix for iPad][1] for a while now and my biggest complaint is that the developer made me choose between putting it on my iPad mini, or retina iPad. The iPad version is seriously good and I feel lost without it on my iPad. Felix is hands down the best App.net client out…

    I’ve been testing [Felix for iPad][1] for a while now and my biggest complaint is that the developer made me choose between putting it on my iPad mini, or retina iPad. The iPad version is seriously good and I feel lost without it on my iPad.

    Felix is hands down the best App.net client out there. [Buy the iPad version][2].

    *(I hear a rumor the [iPhone version][3] might be free for a few hours.)*

    [1]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/felix-for-app.net-ipad-edition/id653222239?ls=1&mt=8
    [2]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/felix-for-app.net-ipad-edition/id653222239?ls=1&mt=8
    [3]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/felix-for-app.net/id562447652?ls=1&mt=8

  • For the Love of the Drive

    [Brian Merchant argues that cars][1], or driving, is dying in part because of communities that allow people to move about without their own cars and he also clues into social networking like Facebook. The argument being that “we” wanted cars so that “we” could connect and talk to others and now “we” don’t need cars…

    [Brian Merchant argues that cars][1], or driving, is dying in part because of communities that allow people to move about without their own cars and he also clues into social networking like Facebook. The argument being that “we” wanted cars so that “we” could connect and talk to others and now “we” don’t need cars for this because of Facebook and the like.

    Thus kids are less interested in cars and driving, and the rest of the world is starting to follow suit in that thinking too.

    And so cars are dead, long live cars.

    I don’t entirely disagree with the notion that the automobile is losing its prestige in America, but I think there is something more to consider/blame than just urban planning and social networking.

    Merchant is mostly looking at cars only as a means to an end: Owning and driving a car is for transportation and nothing else.

    That’s a rather short-sighted view because driving a car is an experience. Or rather it *used* to be. Now the driving experience is consumed by:

    – GPS systems instructing you.
    – Phones ringing.
    – DVD players rolling.
    – iPods jamming.
    – Subwoofers.
    – 18 cup-holders.
    – McDonald’s double cheeseburgers. ((The best item on the menu, clearly.))

    Driving, even when I was a kid, was a challenge. Your car gave you feedback, you felt the road, you got lost, you were on your own. Traction control wasn’t standard, GPS was just becoming available, and few people had cell phones.

    Modern cars have effectively eliminated all of these challenges in one fell swoop. Phones never allow you to get lost or disconnected. Entertainment systems never let your mind relax. Modern suspension, steering, tires, and engines remove the sound and feeling of the car — and people rarely lose control.

    You never get lost driving any more, and you never actually *do* the driving — you just control a *thing* which happens to be propelling itself down the road. This is what we now call driving.

    Now the driver is so disconnected from the experience of driving, that they are more of an operator. That is: driving is not a skill anymore, as much as a mechanical thing that anyone can be taught.

    I think this is important to note when talking about driving and cars in America. We used to be a society that loved to drive, not for the utility of transportation, but because we loved the feel and experience that driving gave us.

    Right or wrong, technology has slowly eaten away at that experience and taken all of the challenges out of it. And while that has made driving safer and no doubt more reliable — it has also made driving a whole lot less interesting.

    I’ve mentioned before that our family car is a Dodge Journey. Which is neither a great car, nor a bad car. It’s just a car. I drove it as our only car for 6 months and it was boring. I didn’t like driving any more, it was just a necessity.

    So when we needed to get a second car for me to drive for work I immediately started looking at the oldest cars possible that I thought my wife would sign off on. I was close to acquiring a 1988 BMW M5 — a sedan that might just be one of the most interesting and pure driver’s cars out there. So simple in its beauty and operation that a BMW guy can’t help but lust for it.

    Instead I settled on a 2002 BMW M5 because I knew I would get far less grief from my wife should it run into a mechanical problem. The E39 M5 is really the last true driver’s M5 in this man’s opinion. While the newer M5’s are simply amazing cars, they also do a lot of things *for* you. ((That’s not to say I don’t like them — I love them and they are awesome to drive — but they aren’t mechanical enough to make you feel that you are one with the machine.)) With one button in the E39 I can effectively take away the modern safety controls and try my best to harness 400HP on the wet roads of Washington — not safe, but making your palms sweat a bit is living.

    I love driving again.

    I don’t think driving is dying among today’s youth because of suburban planning or Facebook — I think it’s dying because we as a society have effectively neutered the visceral experience of driving.

    We’ve made driving too easy and too automatic.

    There’s no risk, no drama, just the boring result of arriving at your destination on time.

    While the decline in driving is undoubtedly good for the environment, it’s also sad to watch something that so defines your country become a misunderstood hobbyist activity.

    [1]: http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/facebook-and-brooklyn-are-killing-the-car

  • Radiator Whiskey – Brooks Review Meetup (Update)

    We will be meeting at [Radiator Whiskey in downtown Seattle][1] (near Pike Place Market). For the rest of the details [see this post][2]. Bring whoever, but the bar space is limited. I look like the picture on the [Colophon][3] so come up and say hi when you get there. [1]: http://www.yelp.com/biz/radiator-whiskey-seattle [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2013/04/hi-there/ [3]: https://brooksreview.net/colophon/

    We will be meeting at [Radiator Whiskey in downtown Seattle][1] (near Pike Place Market). For the rest of the details [see this post][2].

    Bring whoever, but the bar space is limited. I look like the picture on the [Colophon][3] so come up and say hi when you get there.

    [1]: http://www.yelp.com/biz/radiator-whiskey-seattle
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2013/04/hi-there/
    [3]: https://brooksreview.net/colophon/

  • Quote of the Day: Dustin Curtis

    “In the presence of someone wearing Glass, you can never have privacy.” — Dustin Curtis

    “In the presence of someone wearing Glass, you can never have privacy.”
  • On Writing

    [Mr. Blanc on writing][1]: > I wait to get started because I assume that if I don’t write something magical and clever as I’m typing it for the first time then I certainly won’t be able to improve upon it in the editing and re-writing process. I’ve only felt the fear that Shawn describes when…

    [Mr. Blanc on writing][1]:

    > I wait to get started because I assume that if I don’t write something magical and clever as I’m typing it for the first time then I certainly won’t be able to improve upon it in the editing and re-writing process.

    I’ve only felt the fear that Shawn describes when someone asks me to write something for them (e.g The Magazine, etc). I hate that, I hate that process, and I hate doing it because it locks me up.

    Typically I’m too busy to write drafts. Typically if I have time to write, I better make words appear because that time is few and far between. So my typical “process” is:

    1. Idea for something.
    2. Write, or at the very least make a note of my thought with the post title (yep select that before I write) and my main point I want to convey.
    3. Add to, or re—read the article.
    4. Re—read article only if step three was add to and not re-read. (I only re-read things once, unless they get over 1000 words, then I read twice with the second reading trying to make sure flow is right.)
    5. Determine if article is worth posting, and then determine if I send it to [James][2] for editing.
    6. Post.
    7. Fix typos as readers yell at me about them.
    8. Back to work.

    Over thinking writing always nets me a blank page, so from day one I have just put words down whenever I get time, or am so inspired.

    [1]: http://shawnblanc.net/2013/05/the-root-of-non-writing/
    [2]: http://jamesmart.in

  • Save Podcasting! Help the Electronic Frontier Foundation

    You know what to do, donate like a mofo to take down a patent troll and [“save podcasting”][1]. No brainer. [1]: https://supporters.eff.org/donate/save-podcasting

    You know what to do, donate like a mofo to take down a patent troll and [“save podcasting”][1]. No brainer.

    [1]: https://supporters.eff.org/donate/save-podcasting

  • Quote of the Day: Chris Bowler

    “In terms of sheer power, my MacBook Pro greatly exceeds my iPad. The smaller device is simply less capable, but maybe that’s the point.” – Chris Bowler

    “In terms of sheer power, my MacBook Pro greatly exceeds my iPad. The smaller device is simply less capable, but maybe that’s the point.”
  • Taste Testing Large v. Small Ice Cubes

    [Nick Guy posted an update to his ice cube tray post][1] on Sweet Home, following the challenge from [Dr. Drang][2]: > I wanted to prove or disprove if using different ice cube sizes from our recommended Tovolo trays (big and small) would make a difference in taste. I’m glad this came back up again because…

    [Nick Guy posted an update to his ice cube tray post][1] on Sweet Home, following the challenge from [Dr. Drang][2]:

    > I wanted to prove or disprove if using different ice cube sizes from our recommended Tovolo trays (big and small) would make a difference in taste.

    I’m glad this came back up again because I have some additional points to make on this subject. In Guy’s test two out of three people could taste the difference, saying that the smaller cubes were diluting the drink more. Now this test is flawed for a few reasons:

    1. The tester group was too small.
    2. Allowing ice to melt and re-freezing the ice can/will cause a taste problem with the ice and is not a real world situation to begin with. A better test would have been multiple setups where the ice need not be removed at all.
    3. It’s unknown how familiar the testers are with whiskey, or the flavor profile of the particular whiskey they were tasting.

    The last bit is important, because slight dilution of whiskey with water can actually *improve* the flavor of the drink. Much like allowing red wine to breathe, good whiskey will need the same thing. It is not uncommon for a whiskey drinker to add a drop or two of water to the drink to “open up” the flavor profile.

    You can read a bit more about [adding drops of water to whiskey on Quora][3].

    [1]: http://thesweethome.com/reviews/the-best-ice-cube-tray/
    [2]: http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/05/big-ice-cubes/
    [3]: http://www.quora.com/Whiskey/Why-add-a-drop-of-water-to-whiskey

  • Quote of the Day: @Jeswin

    “Facebook is godsent for people who love to talk, but have nothing to say” — @Jeswin

    “Facebook is godsent for people who love to talk, but have nothing to say”
  • ‘The Rise of the Mobile-Only User’

    I love [this passage from Karen McGrane][1] talking mobile websites: > It’s frustrating and confusing for them if you only give them a little bit of what you offer on your “real” website. If you try to guess which subset of your content the mobile user needs, you’re going to guess wrong. Deliver the same…

    I love [this passage from Karen McGrane][1] talking mobile websites:

    > It’s frustrating and confusing for them if you only give them a little bit of what you offer on your “real” website. If you try to guess which subset of your content the mobile user needs, you’re going to guess wrong. Deliver the same content as your desktop user sees. (If you think some of your content doesn’t deserve to be on mobile, guess what — it doesn’t deserve to be on the desktop either. Get rid of it.)

    Unfortunately McGrane has it wrong, the section that should be in parentheses is the entire article, with the bit that *is* in parentheses in bold instead.

    [1]: http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/05/the_rise_of_the_mobile-only_us.html

  • How to End a Press Release

    [Glenn Fleishman’s ending to the press release announcing the sale of The Magazine][1]: > MARCO ARMENT is an ostensibly carbon-based life form currently residing in Hastings-on-Hudson, declared the Williamsburg of the North by the New York Times, whence he produces podcasts, blog entries, jeremiads, and software. He and his wife have one child and one…

    [Glenn Fleishman’s ending to the press release announcing the sale of The Magazine][1]:

    > MARCO ARMENT is an ostensibly carbon-based life form currently residing in Hastings-on-Hudson, declared the Williamsburg of the North by the New York Times, whence he produces podcasts, blog entries, jeremiads, and software. He and his wife have one child and one dog. Neither is for sale.

    Perfect.

    [1]: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/marco-arment-sells-the-magazine-to-its-editor-glenn-fleishman-209349501.html

  • ‘Big Ice Cubes’

    [Dr. Drang debases the current douchebag-bourbon drinker trend of big ass ice cubes][1] ((I’m not saying all bourbon drinkers are douchebags, just the ones that drink it because it is the “in” drink at the moment. People who do that are clearly douchebags. It just so happens that this class of people get all hot…

    [Dr. Drang debases the current douchebag-bourbon drinker trend of big ass ice cubes][1] ((I’m not saying all bourbon drinkers are douchebags, just the ones that drink it because it is the “in” drink at the moment. People who do that are clearly douchebags. It just so happens that this class of people get all hot and bothered over big ass ice cubes.)) :

    > The writers of these articles seldom invoke the [square-cube law][2] explicitly, but that’s what they’re talking about. In some cases, they go beyond just saying that big cubes melt slower and also claim that they do so while cooling your drink just as much. These claims should be looked upon with a gimlet eye, because the cubes’ melting is what does the cooling.

    So big ice cubes do dilute less, but at the cost of less cooling. As a whiskey drinker I have to say that there is little reason to use ice in good whiskey. The main reason people *actually* use ice is not for the temperature, but more often to dilute the strength of the drink, which is sad and wrong. Those that do that to any whiskey better than the run of the mill whiskey deserve to be banned from all whiskey for life.

    [1]: http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/05/big-ice-cubes/
    [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square-cube_law