
Steve Jobs is a constant reminder to me that one man *can* change the world. And that he did, several times over.
It is now on us to write the next chapter.
Let’s make it a great one.
Top Posts
Steve Jobs is a constant reminder to me that one man *can* change the world. And that he did, several times over. It is now on us to write the next chapter. Let’s make it a great one.

Steve Jobs is a constant reminder to me that one man *can* change the world. And that he did, several times over.
It is now on us to write the next chapter.
Let’s make it a great one.
“I want to put a ding in the universe.” — Steve Jobs That, sir, you did.
Incredibly sad. My sincerest condolences to his family and friends.
Incredibly sad. My sincerest condolences to his family and friends.
*Note: Don’t read the post this article links to, just don’t. It’s terrible.* Zach “I say one thing and then take it back” Epstein over at BGR: >But an interesting takeaway from yesterday’s announcement may simply be that Apple has fallen from grace in some respects. Apple is fallible, even if the 4S ends up…
*Note: Don’t read the post this article links to, just don’t. It’s terrible.*
Zach “I say one thing and then take it back” Epstein over at BGR:
>But an interesting takeaway from yesterday’s announcement may simply be that Apple has fallen from grace in some respects. Apple is fallible, even if the 4S ends up being a success.
MG Siegler says in [response](http://parislemon.com/post/11065619448/apples-fall-from-grace) ((Read his entire response, it’s spot on.)):
>This is, quite simply, one of the worst pieces I’ve ever read on Apple.
While John Gruber [states](http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/10/05/some-fall):
>The *show me something new and shiny* pundits have never understood Apple.
Me? I just wish I could have my time back I spent reading Epstein’s post.
Jason Kottke on the over (under?) reaction to the iPhone 4S: >This is where Apple is at with the iPhone now, a conceptually solved problem: people know what they are, what they’re used for, and Apple’s gonna knuckle down and crank out ever better/faster/smarter versions of them in the future. Or — to use an…
Jason Kottke on the over (under?) reaction to the iPhone 4S:
>This is where Apple is at with the iPhone now, a conceptually solved problem: people know what they are, what they’re used for, and Apple’s gonna knuckle down and crank out ever better/faster/smarter versions of them in the future.
Or — to use an analogy Kottke uses — why would you reinvent the wheel when you just invented the damned thing?
Dan Frommer on the implications that Siri has to Google search: >And, more importantly, Apple is sticking itself between you and Google, by offering direct search access to sites like Wikipedia and Yelp — and many more sites and apps to come, no doubt. Siri doesn’t have to go through Google Search, and it doesn’t…
Dan Frommer on the implications that Siri has to Google search:
>And, more importantly, Apple is sticking itself between you and Google, by offering direct search access to sites like Wikipedia and Yelp — and many more sites and apps to come, no doubt. Siri doesn’t have to go through Google Search, and it doesn’t show you any Google ads. And that should be scary to the folks at Google, which still makes the vast majority of its profit from search advertising.
That’s a great point, though I think it all comes down to usage in the end.
Paul “Windows Guy” Thurrott: >I’ve been saying for a while now that Apple fanatics are underestimating the demand for Windows on an iPad-like tablet, and that many consumers probably walk into Apple Stores to see the iPad but then walk out without one when they discover it doesn’t run Windows or Microsoft Office. That explains…
Paul “Windows Guy” Thurrott:
>I’ve been saying for a while now that Apple fanatics are underestimating the demand for Windows on an iPad-like tablet, and that many consumers probably walk into Apple Stores to see the iPad but then walk out without one when they discover it doesn’t run Windows or Microsoft Office.
That explains the massive sales that Windows tablets (slates/convertibles) have had prior to the iPad, now doesn’t it.
David W. Martin is blaming Apple, under the thinly veiled guise of “an AT&T customer service representative (CSR)” telling him something, for the [messed up upgrade pricing](https://brooksreview.net/2011/10/att-upgrade-lunacy/) on the iPhone 4S. Yeah, I have heard from a few of those “CSRs” too — all of them blame AT&T, not Apple. Why would Apple — the…
David W. Martin is blaming Apple, under the thinly veiled guise of “an AT&T customer service representative (CSR)” telling him something, for the [messed up upgrade pricing](https://brooksreview.net/2011/10/att-upgrade-lunacy/) on the iPhone 4S. Yeah, I have heard from a few of those “CSRs” too — all of them blame AT&T, not Apple.
Why would Apple — the company that works hard to continually lower or keep prices the same — not want everyone to buy the phone subsidized? Apple gets full price no matter what, so they would stand to sell many more phones if it was subsidized — thus it makes the most business and goodwill sense for Apple to offer the upgrade pricing.
This “report” just makes no sense. ((Hard to believe he refrained from adding “Exclusive” to the title.))
Mike Davidson has a great look at the choices we currently have with regard to cameras. I personally use my iPhone 4 and a Canon 5D, however I have been considering the Micro 43 move as well — it makes better sense as a travel/hiking camera. If I could swing the expense, I would buy…
Mike Davidson has a great look at the choices we currently have with regard to cameras. I personally use my iPhone 4 and a Canon 5D, however I have been considering the Micro 43 move as well — it makes better sense as a travel/hiking camera.
If I could swing the expense, I would buy the Olympus PEN E-P3 (affiliate link) right now — a great setup.
Florian Mueller with yet another excellent analysis — this time why Samsung’s attempt to ban the iPhone 4S is bad for everyone. Specifically that it would seem Samsung is jumping the gun, seeking to shut something down without even asking for licensing fees first. In his penultimate paragraph Mueller wonders: >Why aren’t those carriers, whose…
Florian Mueller with yet another excellent analysis — this time why Samsung’s attempt to ban the iPhone 4S is bad for everyone. Specifically that it would seem Samsung is jumping the gun, seeking to shut something down without even asking for licensing fees first. In his penultimate paragraph Mueller wonders:
>Why aren’t those carriers, whose business fundamentally depends on the undisrupted functioning of industry standards, up in arms when Samsung uses communications standards patents against Apple?
He is of course referring to this: “Verizon and T-Mobile filed amicus curiae (“friend-of-the-court”) briefs in support of Samsung in California”. The question then becomes: are Verizon and T-Mobile hypocrites?
Time to pop some popcorn. ((Yes, Shawn, in the microwave.))
Great, quick, overview by MG Siegler of what choosing each of the iPhone carriers likely means. I didn’t realize that AT&T was the only carrier that has the full 14.4 speed network that the new iPhone can do (at least they are for now).
Great, quick, overview by MG Siegler of what choosing each of the iPhone carriers likely means. I didn’t realize that AT&T was the only carrier that has the full 14.4 speed network that the new iPhone can do (at least they are for now).
As soon as I could check availability pricing for the new iPhone 4S, I checked. I am not eligible, in fact here’s my pricing break down: I don’t normally complain about such things on TBR — typically I reserve those complaints for Twitter — but in this case it seems to be a very odd…
As soon as I could check availability pricing for the new iPhone 4S, I checked. I am not eligible, in fact here’s my pricing break down:

I don’t normally complain about such things on TBR — typically I reserve those complaints for Twitter — but in this case it seems to be a very odd problem, one that many users are facing, and a first for AT&T.
### Bit of Background
I purchased the first iPhone on day one and before that had been a loyal AT&T customer since I was in seventh grade (over ten years ago). I am, for the lack of a better term, the perfect AT&T customer. It costs them nothing to keep me.
AT&T has given me upgrade pricing for every model of the iPhone I have purchased after that first phone (3G, 3GS, 4), and I have been loyal because of it.
### The Big Problem
For the very first time I am actually considering buying an iPhone fully unlocked and getting out of all of my contracts with wireless carriers — mainly because they all suck.
It will set me back $649 to get the 64GB iPhone 4S — the one I want. I can afford it, but why does it cost my wife — who is also on AT&T (family plan, not the primary number) and who also bought an iPhone 4 on day one — only $399 for the same model?
The solution, for me, is easy: buy the new iPhone under my wife’s plan and move it to mine. A bit of a hassle, but substantially cheaper.
However, since complaining about this on Twitter I have received a ton of responses which all say a similar thing.
It seems, for most people, that purchased the iPhone 4 on day one it would actually be cheaper for them to buy a new iPhone 4S on another network (Verizon, usually) and pay the AT&T cancellation fee. These people (myself included) would save — at a minimum — $50.
Let’s just state this again: for many others and for me, it is $50 **cheaper** to break the AT&T contract and switch to another carrier.
*Wow*.
The idiocy of wireless carriers has reached a new low.
### Options
Here are a few options that you may want to consider to try and get the upgrade pricing (this applies to AT&T customers, as I have never been a customer of another network):
– Using a plan of a family member to buy your new phone. This only works if they like hand me down iPhones, or have no interest in buying a new phone for a couple more years.
– Call AT&T and ask for the upgrade pricing. Threatening to leave to another carrier if they do not relent. This works in many cases, but not in all cases. You need to be courteous, but adamant — fine line and all.
– Change your account to a Family Plan and add a new line, using that line to buy the iPhone 4S at the upgrade price. I have been on one so long I can’t say for sure if this is a better deal, but it is an option. Do the math first. The fringe benefit here is that you should always then be able to buy a new phone at an upgrade price — I emphasize “should” here.
– Actually switch carriers.
### Why This is Odd
Up and until this iPhone, AT&T has been fantastic about allowing existing iPhone users to upgrade at the upgrade price levels on day one. This has likely kept many customers on their network, after all why leave and pay a termination fee?
Now, with two competitors getting the hottest phone in the country, AT&T decides that it is time to start screwing with (perhaps) their most loyal customers. That’s odd.
*(Note about Verizon: I didn’t think Verizon customers would get the pricing, since they — unlike AT&T users — haven’t had the phone for over a year yet. It seems that in my informal Twitter poll, this is the case: no upgrade pricing for iPhone 4 Verizon customers. Likely, it would be cheaper for Verizon customers to switch networks also. Odd stuff.)*
Nik Cubrilovic has another post that I missed about how to setup up a secure system for browsing if you are a Facebook user. He breaks it into three steps, each of which have several sub-steps. I it still recommended by the TBR staff ((Which is just me.)) that you don’t use Facebook. The benefits…
Nik Cubrilovic has another post that I missed about how to setup up a secure system for browsing if you are a Facebook user. He breaks it into three steps, each of which have several sub-steps.
I it still recommended by the TBR staff ((Which is just me.)) that you don’t use Facebook. The benefits (what ever you convince yourself they are) do not out weigh the eventual consequences. ((If you disagree, then so be it.))
Nik Cubrilovic on a Facebook cookie that tracks you, even if you are not a Facebook user: >The cookie was being set even if the user had never been to the Facebook site, and even if they didn’t click a ‘like’ or ‘share’ button. Damned good reason to never pollute your site with a Facebook…
Nik Cubrilovic on a Facebook cookie that tracks you, even if you are not a Facebook user:
>The cookie was being set even if the user had never been to the Facebook site, and even if they didn’t click a ‘like’ or ‘share’ button.
Damned good reason to never pollute your site with a Facebook button. ((I am contemplating the removal of the Tweet button on this site.)) It was present on my computer…
New, illogical name. Same look with some amazing features. Notably an amazing camera, and the Siri assistant. You are going to want the 64GB model this time around.
New, illogical name. Same look with some amazing features. Notably an amazing camera, and the Siri assistant. You are going to want the 64GB model this time around.
I am probably going to append this to the very next email I send to an attorney, or anyone else with a legal disclaimer — especially if my reply is one word. [via Coudal]
I am probably going to append this to the very next email I send to an attorney, or anyone else with a legal disclaimer — especially if my reply is one word.
Mike Masnick reporting: >The Patent Examiner blog has the incredible story of Innovatio IP, a patent troll that recently acquired a portfolio of patents that its lawyers (what, you think there are any employees?) appear to believe cover pretty much any WiFi implementation. Be sure to read the comments from the lawyers, they are —…
Mike Masnick reporting:
>The Patent Examiner blog has the incredible story of Innovatio IP, a patent troll that recently acquired a portfolio of patents that its lawyers (what, you think there are any employees?) appear to believe cover pretty much any WiFi implementation.
Be sure to read the comments from the lawyers, they are — uh — amazing. In related news I am close to buying the patent for standing while urinating — though I only plan on enforcing it at stadiums for right now.
Horace Dediu with a great analysis of why the Sprint deal isn’t crazy: >If anything the riskiest thing for Sprint would have been not to do the deal at all.
Horace Dediu with a great analysis of why the Sprint deal isn’t crazy:
>If anything the riskiest thing for Sprint would have been not to do the deal at all.
I have been using Growl for so long that I forget it’s not a part of OS X by default. Now in the Mac App Store with a real business model. ((Selling the app for $1.99.))
I have been using Growl for so long that I forget it’s not a part of OS X by default. Now in the Mac App Store with a real business model. ((Selling the app for $1.99.))