Two things are clear from this video:
- The iPad is slower to load web pages.
- Windows was not made to work with large fingers.
Two things are clear from this video:
Google:
Creativity, innovation and a free and open marketplace are all at stake in this fight.
That is until we started selling Android devices to Verizon.
Very nice and very free.
So damned good.
[Updated: 8/11/10 at 6:31 AM] Turns out this is a hoax and the girl is an actress. Still though this would be a damned good way to quit your job.
This is worth every penny – hiring people costs a lot of money. If you are trying to setup a site and want it to be easy and look good, then this just may be the ticket (don’t forget to get Caching turned on though).
More backlash from the ‘street view wifi sniffing’ project that Google used.
It was a rallying cry that every twenty-something in the tech world could rally around “Don’t Be Evil” – the unofficial slogan of internet sensation Google. In fact many of us did rally behind Google, it was the antithesis of Microsoft, more open than Apple – home spun and loved by all. This quickly made Google a success with billions in dollars and lead to a search monopoly and we are soon to see that it probably does have a email (gmail) and mapping monopoly as well.
The past two years has really told a different story though. Street view came out and we all loved it, still do. Then we found out that Google was sniffing Wi-Fi data and storing it. Tsk tsk many of us said, as we brushed the event under the carpet. Regulators and governments were pissed, but the end user seemed not to care. Yet in this instance Google broke its own motto, Section 4 and 7 were broken – they failed to preserve confidentiality and obey the law.
We kept loving Google though, they were after all still Google and costing us nothing – we can’t imagine a world without Google Search and Gmail. Don’t forget about this little thing though:
We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to >information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in >agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that “we will carefully monitor >conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine >that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our >approach to China.”
So Google was censoring search results in order to obey the Chinese law, but in the end that was not respecting their guideline of “Serve Our users” in Google’s motto. So they decided to change it (after 4 years) and remove the censorship. Naturally this broke Chinese law and now Google has made a work around where the search is not censored and no laws are broken. This however should have never happened if Google followed its motto, this should have been done from day one in China. Of course hindsight is 20/20, but Google clearly broke its motto in this instance.
And now of course comes the hot topic of the week, the Verizon and Google proposal on Net Neutrality to the FCC and Congress. Google had long taken the stance that the 100% supported Net Neutrality, something that every techie breathed a sigh of relief by. Now though it seems they only support convenient net Neutrality. (Read about all this crap, here, here, here, here and here.) The gist of all this being that Google is screwing over the users of the Internet – which our their users, thus breaking their code of conduct once again.
This answer is way more simplistic than most would think: investors happened. Ask any entrepreneur and they will tell you that you can do whatever the hell you want to do when you are the primary investor, but once you take someone else’s money you have to start listening to them, and things change. Google is a for profit company, they need to make money to satisfy the stock price and to continue to grow. Don’t be Evil is an idealistic slogan that was started by two guys that are clearly no longer in control of the company they started.
Google started sniffing WiFi data to see what they could learn and to see what they could monetize off of it. They censored search in China to gain access to a billion new potential users, that would in turn hopefully click on Google’s ads. They are turning against Net Neutrality to satisfy and business partner in Verizon – which is key to Google’s mobile OS strategy. Every single action that Google has taken to date that violates their motto is a direct result of a company trying to increase profits.
Profits by themselves are a great thing, and no one can fault Google for trying to be more profitable – that is the end game of any company. Google is however at fault for not following their own code of conduct – their self imposed rules of governance. Google is evil right now, not because they seek more profits, but because they are doing so while ignoring the edict that they stated at the outset.
Time to change your code of conduct, or change your conduct Google.
Marco Arment with perhaps one of the best analogies I have heard lately:
But at such a large premium over the Core i7 iMac, it’s tough to justify or recommend. It’s like buying an SLR if you’re only ever going to use the kit lens.
Great tip, I have always used caching plugins and this site as been able to survive some heavy days with no problems. I used to use HyperCache on this blog, but given some recent oddities with where it stores the files I have switched to WP Super Cache.
Larry Ellison via Ashlee Vance of the New York Times:
The H.P. board just made the worst personnel decision since the idiots on the Apple board fired Steve Jobs many years ago…That decision nearly destroyed Apple and would have if Steve hadn’t come back and saved them.
Once again reaffirming my love for Ellison.
This is like when I was a kid trying to persuade my parents that I could come up with a fitting punishment for my transgressions. Always looked out for #1, Verizon and Microsoft (oops I mean Google, mine as well be Microsoft though) are looking out for themselves. The real question is: “why do consumers think that Google will look out for them?”
If I was Microsoft I would have made the entire site in Flash and said one thing:
If you were on a PC right now you would not hear your CPU fans spinning…
This is what I was talking about yesterday – Gruber speaks to why the timing was as such here. The antenna wasn’t as big of an issue as the competing corporate cultures.
Killer way to spruce up your Finder sidebar.
Kevin Purdy:
Google’s SSL Web Search (beta) extension provides the same kind of encrypted searches safe from third parties as you’d get by visiting encrypted.google.com. Installing this extension simply creates a new search engine in Chrome, which you can then set as the default to make all your Google searches secure, or change its keyword for a quick encryption toggle. Your searches should be safe from prying eyes, but they’re still known to Google, of course.
What the hell are people searching for?
This is how you succeed in business today, Daniel H. Pink:
In a world awash in information and choices, clarity is now a source of competitive advantage, says [Jason] Fried. “The real winners in business are going to be the clear companies. Clarity is what everybody really wants and appreciates.”
Bottom line, be open and honest. You will be amazed how favorably people will react.
In college independent coffee shops were all we frequented because of the fact that they had free Wi-Fi. Since the Verizon MiFi came out I couldn’t care less what coffee shop I work out of (only on Fridays and the occasional Saturday) – that is until last month. Last month Starbucks switched to free Wi-Fi and since I usually worked out of Starbucks (the paid Wi-Fi meant more tables were available on average) it has become pretty difficult to find a coffee shop to work at.
The coffee shop industry is undergoing another change, the small shops are starting to charge for the internet access (at least from what I am seeing in Portland and Seattle) while the big guy (Starbucks) is making it free. This just means that more people are going to be remote working out of Starbucks.
Kudos to the independent shops for being smart enough to see the change and start reacting to it – that is how you survive against a competitor like Starbucks.
I am a huge Sharpie fan – so two quick things about this:
It was reported yesterday that Apple and Mark Papermaster have parted ways. By all accounts from people seemingly in the ‘know’ Papermaster was fired. Papermaster had been in charge of mobile device hardware design/engineering coming from the mobile processors devision of IBM. This firing has of course led to rampant speculation in the blogosphere as to why he was fired, most concluding that it all comes down to the negative PR and the issues associated with the iPhone 4’s antenna design.
This seems like the natural reason why he would have been fired – after all the iPhone 4’s antenna does have a ‘weak spot’ and it caused Apple to have to give stuff away for free – something that no company likes to do. So it seems natural that this was the reason for his firing and it very well could be the reason.
However as I stated here, and John Gruber pointed out here I think it could have to do with (at least in part) the delay of the manufacturing for the white iPhone 4, which keeps getting pushed back leading many to wonder if it is 2010’s biggest vaporware product. Ask yourself what is more embarrassing for Steve Jobs, shipping a less than perfect product, or not shipping a product on time after announcing it?
I think the answer is the latter – Jobs ships products and he usually does so on time. The timing of this firing just doesn’t make sense for it to be solely based on the antenna – if that was the case it would have happened just before or right after the iPhone 4 press conference. Leaving Apple to say that they are giving free cases and have fired the person responisble for this ‘weak spot’. Instead of firing comes much later – well after the bad press around the antenna had subsided.
Add to all this the fact that many are reporting that the iPhone 4 antenna had been designed long before Papermaster was on the scene – leaving him to just finalize the design – and I think the story begins to tell itself.
My guess (and this is a wild shot in the dark) is that Papermaster didn’t fit in Apple, be it with Jobs or the management team as a whole (culturally or otherwise, remember IBM and Apple are very different companies) and the delays to the white iPhone 4 coupled with the antenna issues did Papermaster in.
We may never know but what seems clear to me is that now was probably the best time to fire Papermaster. Had Apple waited until things were going smoothly there would have been wild speculation and much concern from investors (read: Wallstreet) that would have negatively impacted Apple’s stock. A firing now leads people to think that Apple is not putting up with failure and is trying to correct course (albeit a minor correction) which will only make investors more confident, thus pushing up the stock.
At the risk of sounding like a bad movie, Apple fired the right guy at the right time. ((You know they always try to use the movie’s title in the dialog.))
Byron Acohido:
The patch is completed, Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris said in an interview. But Kerris said on Friday that she was not able to give a time frame for its public release.
I would expect it sooner rather than later.