The Brooks Review

Month: January 2011

  • The Apple TV

    For three years I have been using a first generation PowerPC Mac mini as my home media center — for those three years it has sat faithfully attached to different TVs and different external HDs. For three years it has broadcast HD quality ((Not 720p, but very high resolution.)) video on our TV in the living room. I would sound like your ideal candidate for the first generation Apple TV ((True I wanted one.)) but I never saw how it would be better than my Mac mini.

    As I read reviews of the original Apple TV I got the distinct impression that it was OK, but not great and certainly a tad over priced for what it was. My Mac mini just worked and so in an extraordinary show of restraint, I just let things be. I have that old ass Mac mini hooked up to a 55” LCD TV via VGA and guess what? It still works.

    True, it can’t play any of the 720p videos you find online and it dies if you try to play a Flash video, but you give it a nice h.264 encoded AVI and a little VLC love and everything is works swimmingly.

    Then Apple released the Apple TV 2 and damn is it sexy looking. Oh, that price is very nice too.

    When I unboxed the Apple TV I had huge hopes that it would allow me to get rid of the Mac mini under our TV — I thought perhaps I could just stream the media from the Mac mini to the Apple TV.

    Can this Apple TV replace a 5+ year old PowerPC Mac?

    Setting Up

    Not knowing if I would want to keep the Apple TV or not I plopped it beside my Mac mini and hooked it up. I immediately ran into a bunch of problems with this setup:

    1. Our TV is mounted to the wall above our fireplace, below it sits the Apple TV on the mantle — all told it is about 4’-8” high. Which is great — except when you sit down and try to get the remote to work. In fact the only way to have the Apple TV within 3’ ((Restricted by the length of Apple’s HDMI cable.)) is to place it on the mantle, or let it dangle in front of the fireplace. So getting the infrared remote to work properly while one is comfortably seated on the couch means pushing the Apple TV all the way to the edge of the mantle. This works well enough, but hardly looks good. I now see why so many people wanted an RF or Bluetooth based remote, the Apple TV could certainly use one.

    2. I run an Airport Extreme that is a few years old, but works just fine. ((I have the 802.11n model, but not the one that allows you to dual broadcast the 2.4GHz and 5GHz signals, nor can I have the guest network.)) The optimal placement in our home for the Airport is below the TV, giving us the best possible WiFi coverage. ((More importantly excellent coverage at my home desk.)) The Apple TV though sits 18” away from the router — meaning I get pretty crappy WiFi reception with it. ((You actually do need some distance between the router and the receiving device.)) I dug out a 30’ ethernet cable (the only one we have) and hooked up the Apple TV so that I could get proper internet 18” away from the router. ((This looks absurd, given that the coil from the cable is bigger in size than that of the Apple TV.))

    3. Entering passwords and usernames is more painful than a paper cut beneath your finger nail. I have yet to see a device that doesn’t have a keyboard come up with a good way to enter text. ((Thanks for all the suggestions that I use the Remote.app for iOS. I am aware of it, but excluded it from this review as I assume not everyone has iOS to use this.))

    4. Home Sharing is a piece of cake — Apple got that one right.

    Overall the greatest friction point of setup for most users is going to be entering passwords — there needs to be a better/faster way to enter text on the Apple TV. I would suggest that Apple make the setup process so that once you get the WiFi password in you can grab your MobileMe settings from your Mac via home sharing. Heck they could even add a preference pane in iTunes to allow you to input all your other usernames and passwords (e.g. Flickr, NetFlix). Making the setup process a hell of a lot quicker.

    Further how sweet would it be if you could build an Apple TV rental queue on your Mac, so when you get home all your movies are ready to be watched.

    Renting

    I have rented two movies from iTunes since I got the Apple TV.

    It took me about 5 minutes to rent the damned movie. The problem: credit card security. The Apple TV kept asking me for the credit cards’ security code — I had to enter it 5 times before it took. I don’t know why and I assume this was a one time problem, but even still it was a frustrating experience.

    Once the movie was rented I had to “find” it before I could watch it — I thought it was odd that there was no option to watch the movie right away. Even so, once I found the movie on the home screen it started playing fast — actually damn fast. I was very surprised by this. Even more the quality was much higher resolution than I expected and than I am used to with the Mac mini.

    We watched the entire movie with out a jitter or pause in the video, everything went flawlessly. Aside from the purchasing hoopla we had a great time renting the movie. Looking back I am even more surprised that with a standard Comcast cable connection in a multi-unit building I was able to stream an HD movie within seconds of buying it and having never experienced a jitter in the video. That may be worth the $99 for the device right there — also there were no teenagers on my couch with beeping a blinking cell phones, so put that in the pluses column.

    A couple of nights later we decided to rent another movie — this time we were greeted with a message telling us that the movie would be ready to play in 1 hour and 40 minutes. This shocked us both, but apparently a lot of people see this bug and the solution is to just turn off “Send data to Apple”. Odd, but it fixed the problem and again we had no problems after that. I will say though that it took me about 15 minutes to get this problem fixed and as my wife reminded me: “We could be 15 minutes into the movie by now.”

    We rented two movies and had errors with the device each time, if I wasn’t a techie I would have serious reservations about the device at this point. I don’t say this to be dramatic, but each time it would have been a tad cheaper and almost as fast to drive to the nearest RedBox to rent a DVD. ((Though to be honest I don’t know if our DVD player even works and I doubt it is connected to the TV.)) I don’t rent DVDs, I don’t go to the Movies — so for me to really like the Apple TV it needs to stay out of my way.

    All told I have no doubt that each time you rent a movie the experience gets better and better, but realistically how many movies/TV shows will you be renting? The content is just too limited to make this a device that most are going to use daily for renting of movies and shows. Even if you rented all the time, how long could you afford to do that for?

    YouTube

    After we finished with the movie we decided to see what kind of entertainment we could scare up on YouTube. I used to be on YouTube a lot, but I hadn’t watched many videos from YouTube in sometime. We went through various videos in the ‘Top Played’ and ‘Top Rated’ categories. Aside from the varying video quality, we consistently ran into two problems: jittery and slow streaming.

    If you have ever watched YouTube on your computer then you know what I am talking about. Finding and discovering videos is a cinch, but oddly enough the actual playing of the videos is pretty terrible. I am guessing YouTube is to blame for this given that we watched a 90+ minute movie without a problem, yet a 40 second cellphone quality video required 20 seconds of buffering and two pauses in the video. Either way it is unacceptable from a company of Google’s size and abilities.

    YouTube has problems and I remarked several times that I wished the Apple TV had Vimeo support rather than YouTube support — not only does Vimeo have better playback, but the quality of the content is far superior. If you visit YouTube on the Mac and use the Flash player you will find the same experience on the Apple TV, you just won’t hear fan noise at the Apple TV.

    Flickr & MobileMe

    I don’t keep any videos on either of these services, but I do have a ton of pictures on them. Overall the experience is very good, the pictures loaded up in high resolution and pretty quickly. The slide show feature, set to a playlist makes for a nice back drop when you have guests over.

    I don’t know how practical tying in these services are for home use, but I can imagine that if you go to a friends house it would be a great way to show pictures of a recent trip. Certainly provides a better way than burning a DVD or bringing a slide projector in would. Assuming that you don’t go crazy trying to type in your username.

    Then of course the problem that you run into is that not everyone has an Apple TV…

    The Remote

    Most remotes face one or all of these problems: too big, too small, too many buttons, poor button placement, confusing buttons, ugly, or heavy. By now you have most likely seen the Apple remote’s svelte look. It is beautiful to look at and feels excellent in your hand.

    This remote truly is the perfect size.

    Then you start to use it and you begin to realize that it has exactly the right amount of buttons on it. Using this remote you get the sense that the guys who made the remote spent extensive time using and refining the remote. Thought and care was put into the design of this relatively simple looking remote. I know this because when I use this remote (a remote I had never used before mind you) I never once had to look down to see which button was which.

    The Apple TV remote, aside from the lack of RF or Bluetooth, is the best damned remote I have ever held. This remote may even be the best feature of the Apple TV.

    Replace the Mac mini

    As I said in the introduction, I have been using a Mac mini as my media controller for at least the past three years (I think it has even been close to four years now). The Mac mini that is connected is slow, it spends its life with Transmission, VLC, iTunes and Dropbox running. Yes I download BitTorrent files with it — though I will not comment on which kind of BitTorrent files.

    I have Transmission setup to start downloading any Torrent files placed in a Torrents folder inside Dropbox. Back on my Air if I download any BitTorrent files they are automatically moved to that folder in Dropbox. Basically my MacBook Air can trigger the Mac mini to start downloads in Transmission. I have a 1 terabyte drive connected to the mini and over 200 GB of videos on it to watch.

    Unless my wife and I are out of town, not a day goes by that we don’t use the Mac mini to watch something. My sincere hope was that the Apple TV would allow me to tuck away the Mac mini in some far off corner of our house and use just the Apple TV to watch all the same types of media. ((Because: a) the Mac mini is too big for where it sits. b) It has no remotes, meaning I use TouchPad on my iPhone to control the mouse on it.)) Sadly though, that cannot happen just yet.

    I never intended on the Apple TV being able to replicate all the content I get from the mini, but I did hope that I could use iTunes to just stream everything else. Unfortunately that would mean converting every video with Handbrake. This would be fine if I had an Intel Mac mini, but I have an old PowerPC model — to convert say an hour long HD TV show it would take at least an hour or more. Meaning I would not get to watch many videos, instead I would constantly be waiting for the next one to convert on the Mac mini.

    For now the Apple TV is just another device hooked up to the the TV — albeit a damn pretty device. My guess is that the Mac mini still handles a lot of the shorter, constant content that we watch and the Apple TV gets moved to a movie watching device.

    Content

    Apple has put together a large selection of movies, but there is not a large selection of quality classics, nor is there a large selection of movies that I haven’t already seen. ((Those movies that fall into the category of see once and not again.)) The amount of quality movies is rather disappointing and took my right to the Netflix page to sign up.

    Unless you have a kid — there seems to be plenty of great content for them to watch.

    I am truly disappointed in the lack of content. Apple needs to get some of the new movies on the device faster than they normally come out — why do we have to wait for movies to leave the theater before we can rent them with Apple TV? At least let use watch them the moment they leave the theaters.

    TV Show content is really abysmal, only a hand full of TV shows are available to watch. This is the one spot that TV networks could have really made a great fortune as I know my wife will gladly pay to rent a show if she missed it. The networks really need to pull their heads out of their asses on this one.

    Netflix

    I didn’t have a Netflix account when I got the Apple TV, but I decided that in order to properly review this device I needed to get one. Luckily there is a 31 day free trial that you can get and that works just fine with the Apple TV. ((Honestly I would be surprised if I cancel my account at this point, great service.)) In the last section I complained about the lack of quality content, with Netflix my only compliant is that there is so much quality content I have a hard time choosing what to watch.

    If you have an Apple TV and you don’t have a Netflix account, you are missing out on the best part of the Apple TV. Hands down the Netflix support is phenomenal.

    In actual use finding stuff to watch on Netflix is on par with what you would expect for the Apple TV. If you know what you want search works well and if you don’t know what you want browsing will flood you with great options. Most all of my favorite TV shows are available (Even the British Top Gear) and there are loads of great movie options. I can tell you right now, Netflix on the Apple TV is where it is at.

    The playback of Netflix is not on par with Apple level playback. Netflix takes longer to load and doesn’t look as crisp as the stuff I rented from Apple. I didn’t time anything, but my gut response is that Netflix quality and speed is about 90% that of Apples. Which is still phenomenal and better than what I get on the Mac mini.

    During playback I noticed a 1-2 second pause in video and audio once for every 22 minute episode that we watched. This is not terrible, but again this didn’t happen with Apple. One annoying this about the pause is that the video takes right off from where it paused, meaning that it takes you a bit to think about what had been happening before the pause started. It would be great if when a video pauses Apple would rewind the video by 2 seconds so that you really don’t miss a thing.

    Overall though the Netflix integration alone makes the Apple TV worth it, couple that with the remote and you are getting a bargain in my book.

    AirPlay

    One thing I heard when I announced that I got an Apple TV was that AirPlay was going to blow my mind. For the first week I had the Apple TV I forgot to test AirPlay — oops. When I finally got back from Miami I had media on my iPhone and iPad and decided to shoot some video to the Apple TV using my iPad. My network is setup so that it is 802.11n only in the 2.4GHz (I wish the iPhone supported the 5GHz signal), I wanted to note this because I don’t know what the experience is like on slower networks.

    I started playing a movie on my iPad and hit the button to AirPlay — the video didn’t start instantly, but it started up very quickly on the Apple TV. From that point on there were not jitters and not a single lag that I could see. The quality was restricted (I assume) by the low quality file that I use on my iPad (remember it is only 1024×768).

    I can’t say that I see myself using this feature very often (if ever), but I could see a friend “bringing” over a movie to watch at my place using their iPhone/iPad. That would be pretty neat. I wasn’t blown away by this at the time, but thinking back at the zero configuration I needed to do for this does impress me a good bit.

    Podcasts

    I don’t watch many podcasts, but there are a few video podcasts that I truly enjoy. ((Beautiful Places HD and Chase Jarvis RAW.)) Podcast viewing on the Apple TV works in much the same way as renting a show does — with the one exception that the podcasts are free. They load quickly and in high resolution (unless they are not available in high resolutions), you can even mark podcasts as a favorite to track the episodes that you have viewed.

    One thing that is missing: integration with my iTunes. I would love for the Apple TV to see that I am signed into iTunes and to check for the podcasts that I subscribe to on my Mac — showing me what I have watched on there already. It seems like there is a syncing solution missing here, one that could really make the podcast viewing experience great.

    There isn’t much else to say about podcasts on the Apple TV — if you like podcasts and you want them on your TV then that is what you get. If you don’t like podcasts then luckily for you the option is tucked away in the ‘Internet’ menu below Netflix and others.

    Keeper

    The Apple TV won’t be replacing my trusty Mac mini at any point in the near future, but it certainly is pretty cool. For $99 you get a tiny little black box that you would be hard pressed to say is anything but worth the money. There are certainly cheaper places to get a lot of the same content, but not a single other place to get as good of an experience and as quickly as you can with the Apple TV.

  • Cultured Code Shares With the World Its Failures

    In the latest installment of: “Why we don’t have the number 1 requested feature” Cultured Code explains how hard of a problem OTA syncing is. Luckily for anyone else trying to develop OTA sync, Cultured Code tells you why a bunch of options that really aren’t options at all.

    But let’s dissect their last paragraph:

    Some people said we shouldn’t have pursued cloud sync with this level of ambition.

    Actually people just want the solution, not the whining. And then:

    But then, that wouldn’t be us. It is not how we developed Things.

    You mean shipping an update that is more than “bug fixes”? Also:

    We know that people are coming to Cultured Code because we take this approach.

    Or because you are prominently displayed in all of Apples promos and App Stores, but you know they probably like you guys too. Lastly:

    They like companies that care, companies that try – and that is what we will keep doing.

    You know another company that really cares and tries: The Omni Group. Seriously, if you have ever talked to them you know they care. Hell @reply their CEO on Twitter and you stand an excellent chance of getting a response from him. Also: they have OTA sync.

  • “Too much hardware choice”

    Marco Arment arguing why the constant deluge of new Android devices is not a good thing:

    People really like cases for their phones, and if the iPhone has 300 cases for it including that gummy pink one they really like, and the Samsung Whocares XL only has a few drab OEM plastic things available, a nontrivial portion of the market will choose the iPhone on that reason alone.

    So very true, popular designers such as Kate Spade are not going to waste time making a case for a phone that won’t be popular by the time they get the case in stores.

  • Why the Home Button Stays

    Craig Grannell nails all the points why getting rid of the home button isn’t happening. About 10 minutes after installing iOS 4.3 beta on my iPad the whole thing froze (I assume because I was gesturing between apps like a mad fool). The iPad wouldn’t respond to any input and I had to force a restart (holding both the home and lock buttons). That home button isn’t going anywhere — mark the date and time.

  • Dashing All of My Childhood Dreams in One Article

    Ryan Anderson dashing all hope that we will ever see epic laser guns:

    There are a lot of issues with using lasers as weapons. First of all: the optics. For a laser to be useful as a weapon, you would have to focus the light as tightly as possible on the target. De-focus at all, and you might still blind them, but there won’t be much vaporization going on. The precision required for the optics to do this makes a hand-held laser really impractical. The slightest bump or wiggle and all of a sudden your gun is a high-powered flashlight.

  • Quote of the Day: Jason Kottke

    “And of course this was published by Huffington Post, the blog equivalent of Jenny McCarthy.”

  • Why I Am Switching to Interleaved Email Replies and Why You Should Too

    Which is more readable and understandable:

    Q: How old are you?
    A: 28.

    or

    A: 28.
    Q: How old are you?

    We read from top to bottom on computers, which leads most people to say it is more helpful to read the question first, then to see the answer first. This is all rather logical — we need the context before the content. Saying ‘28’ could mean far too many things, but by knowing that the 28 is referring to an age gives us the needed context to properly comprehend the answer. Except, apparently, when we deal with email. The typical emailed response looks like this:

    message 1.png

    In this sequence neither person can easily look back at the email and find what was being replied too. There is loads of confusion with this email. That type of response is called ‘Top Posting’ and it is the most common type of email response you will get and it is the type that you are most likely doing. How often do you end up having to read the entire chain of emails before you figure out what in the hell someone is answering? I find that it is a constant problem.

    Top Posting as defined by Wikipedia:

    In top-posting style, the original message is included verbatim, with the reply above it. It is sometimes referred to by the term TOFU, an acronym for “Text Over, Fullquote Under”

    Recently I found this plugin for Apple’s Mail.app that forces the email client to create ‘Bottom Posted’ responses. Bottom posting in its raw form looks like this:

    message 2.png

    This method is much easier to read for most people, since we are used to seeing the question first, followed by the response. Even with how short this email is, there still can be a lot of confusion. Many people on Twitter can’t fathom why I would switch to this method — everyone does top posting, why be different?

    Well I actually am not trying to be different. I want to copy several of people that I really like, two of which are: Shawn Blanc and John Gruber. Usually when you get a response from either of these people you are going to get a bottom posted reply, but it will not look like the bottom posting you see above. Typically these two use a bottom posting method that is more accurately referred to as: Interleaved Posting. Interleaved posting is the style that I have actually switched to, while keeping some emails Top Posted if the situation doesn’t warrant interleaving. I think most people lump interleaving and bottom posting as one in the same, either way it doesn’t matter much to me what the correct terminology is.

    John Gruber says on the subject:

    Writing an email is like writing an article. Only quote the relevant parts, interspersing your new remarks between the quoted passages. Don’t quote anything at all from the original message if you don’t have to.

    It is a short read, so jump over and read what he has to say on the matter, then come back. Now, if I was actually to respond to the above email example I would do this:

    message 3.png

    Which is more helpful: top posting, or interleaved posting?

    These are extremely short examples, but imagine you got an email that contained multiple things you wanted to respond to — interleaved posting becomes far more efficient than top posting:

    message 4.png

    This is much more efficient than stacking three answers at the top of the email and leaving the recipient to wonder which answer goes with which question. I have been doing this for less that a week now, but I can say that I have yet to see one person complain, or be confused by this. ((Nor has a single person commented to me about this different style: good or bad.))

    If you don’t take the time to edit down what you are replying to, then yes, top posting is the best method. For those of us that want to cut out extraneous emails from our day: why wouldn’t you take the extra bit of time to answer the email properly? Better yet, why wouldn’t you spend an extra 30 seconds and put effort into better email responses? The argument I hear from most people is that they don’t have the time to do this — to which I often wonder if they aren’t just lazy.

    Daniel R. Tobais on the matter:

    This set of characteristics leads naturally toward a preference for the traditional Internet (geek/academic/Usenet) style of using carefully trimmed quotes followed by the reply. This allows point-by-point inline rebuttals, minimizes bandwidth use, is a format well-suited for digesting and archiving, and minimizes the ability of various mail programs to mangle an entire thread.

    Well said. I don’t care much how you reply to me, but I do care what all of my outgoing emails look like. Lastly, if you reply top posted to me I won’t think twice about it. If you reply interleaved to me: you bet your ass I will look at who sent me that email.

    [Updated: 1-13-11 at 9:36 AM]

    Here are some links to get going in Outlook and Gmail.

    [Updated: 1-14-11 at 10:32 AM]
    Here is one for CLI mail agent users.

    [This part of an ongoing series on dealing with email, to see more posts look here.]

  • Home Buttons and iPad 2

    Boy Genius Report is saying that the new multi-touch gestures in iOS 4.3 beta and a tip they have received, confirms that the next generation iPad will not have a physical home button. I would call BS on this if it was anyone other than BGR reporting it.

    That said, I played with iOS 4.3 last night and the multi-touch stuff for switching apps and getting back to the home screen is awesome, but it means one thing: two handed operation. You simply cannot pinch with all 5 fingers to get back the home screen unless you are resting the iPad on something or holding it with your other hand.

  • Marital Deafness

    Scott Adams in what I can only describe as: my life. Has this to say:

    Recently I discovered that spouses, like computers, must be booted up before they can hear what you say.  Try walking into a room where your spouse is otherwise engaged and simply launch into your statement or question. Notice that your first sentence doesn’t count.

  • A Safari 5 Extension for Twitter for Mac

    A great little Safari extension that makes that bookmarklet I posted about obsolete. You don’t need the icon in the toolbar, just use the CTRL+T shortcut. Sweet.

  • Quote of the Day: Noah Stokes

    “Facebook will ruin more relationships than it creates”

  • Carrier Wars Reborn

    Matt Drance on the coming carrier wars between AT&T and Verizon (with the iPhone market being the land they are fighting over, or more specifically the contracts that come with iPhone users):

    Grab your popcorn.

  • John Carey on the Jambox

    I got a Jambox the other day and I was in the process of writing the review. Then John posted his review and I agree with everything he said and can recommend his review as the best one on the Jambox. Now John is an excellent photographer, but by day he is a live audio engineer — which means he is actually qualified to review a speaker. ((Unlike me.))

    John Carey:

    I have never head a small speaker system hold up as well as the Jambox. It’s an incredible feat for such a small enclosure but the low end really does have a substantial kick to it. I won’t recite their marketing jargon here but I can say that I am amazed at what a well rounded sound this little speaker emits with little sacrifice to the higher or midrange frequencies.

  • “The Verizon iPhone Is Too Late”

    The once relevant and somewhat funny guy who wrote the “Fake Steve Jobs Blog”, Dan Lyons, had this to say:

    But Apple’s big weakness is its control-freak nature and insistence that there is only one way to make a smart phone. No matter how many carriers sign on to carry the iPhone, in the long run, Apple has again set itself up to be a niche player in smartphones, just as it is in PCs.

    Clearly the iPhone is niche — I mean it isn’t like your mom or grandparents want one. Obviously people hate the fact that Apple insists you do it their way, that is why iPhone sales are just tiny.

    Wait actually my Mom does have an iPhone as do many grandparents and Apple is selling iPhones left and right.

    The only thing clear is that Dan Lyons has now taken to writing garbage sensational headlines.

  • Personal Hotspot feature coming to all iPhones in iOS 4.3

    Boy Genius Report says it is confirmed and I don’t doubt that. Geller also states that technical acceptance will happen in March, so I would guess that this update would be out in early April.

  • Simple Questions

    Google needs to answer these three four five questions.

    [Assuming Gruber doesn’t sneak in any more questions…]

  • Twitter for Mac Bookmarklet

    A nice little bookmarklet that allows you to tweet a webpage from your browser to Twitter for Mac.

  • HIG HIG HIG HIG HIG HIG HIG HIG

    Jason Z. shaming the ‘Read the fucking HIG’ blog:

    How can we expect our clients or users to respect the care we put into design if we don’t respect it ourselves? Instead of considering what went into the design, we point at laugh at someone’s “terrible design”, retweet and reblog then go on with our superiour existence.

    Worth a read.

  • Quote of the Day: John Gruber

    “I don’t see how Google keeps Flash but drops H.264 in the name of “openness” without being seen as utter hypocrites.”

  • “Twitter Beta-Tested a Spine”

    Ryan Singel reporting on Twitter getting a gag order removed from a subpoena to turn over records:

    That’s what makes Twitter’s move so important. It briefly carried the torch for its users during that crucial period when, because of the gag order, its users couldn’t carry it themselves. The company’s action in asking for the gag order to be overturned sets a new precedent that we can only hope that other companies begin to follow.