Just finished putting up the acoustical foam, so here’s a shot of my desk/setup in our new house for your Saturday enjoyment.
Month: April 2012
-
Google v. Oracle: Day 4
Florian Mueller reporting on testimony from Lindholm — a key witness in the trial — reports:
>In short, Lindholm’s denial of his most famous email having referred to any particular licensor comes down to this: Google needed (and still needs) to negotiate a license with Oracle or with Oracle.I can’t see Google coming out of this unscathed.
-
Did Soda Kill a Mother of Eight?
Christopher Hodgkinson was Natasha Marie Harris’ partner and here is his recounting of how much Coke Harris drank:
>The police say she drank seven liters of Coke a day, but Hodgkinson insists it was more like 10.*Holy shit.*
[via Next Draft] -
Report Text Message Spam to AT&T
Fantastic, I had no idea I could do this.
-
Dark Skies Ahead
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/dark-sky-1.jpg)Before I started writing this post I thought it would be neat to tally how many weather apps I have tried for iOS, then I realized how many that really was, became sad and gave up.
I have tried a lot of iOS weather apps.
The sad truth is that not a single one is fantastic, some are good, while most border on offensive.
When [Dark Sky](http://darkskyapp.com/) came up on KickStarter I had an unusual reaction: I was excited. I backed it, and prodded everyone I knew to back it. I wanted the app and I wanted it badly.
When the app came out earlier this week I received a flood of questions about how good it was, but I couldn’t answer because the Puget Sound region of Washington was having an odd bout of very dry weather. The past few days the normal weather has returned and I was able to put Dark Sky through its paces. Here you will find my long winded thoughts on yet another weather app.
The short version: It’s on my home screen and will likely stay there. It’s very good, but not perfect.
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/dark-sky_001.PNG)
### A Bit About Needs
My needs for a weather app *will* vary from your needs. Dark Sky is all about precipitation — not temps or long term forecasts. It is specifically about the type of perception you can expect in the next hour, and when in that hour you will see rain. This is a fantastic tool if you live in the Puget Sound region because 90% of our weather can be split in three categories:
1. Overcast (this isn’t “cloudy with blue skies” this is all gray skies all day).
2. Cold Rain.
3. Not Cold Rain. (I don’t mean warm here.)The funny thing about it: all three of those weather events visually look the same if you look at the sky. Sure there are ways to tell if it is going to rain, but you can never be sure. Since no self respecting Puget Sounder will be caught with an umbrella, that means we need to know if we need to wear a waterproof jacket or not. Enter Dark Sky.
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/dark-sky_002.PNG)
So for me, Dark Sky is filling a very immediate need.
This is not to say that in other parts of the world Dark Sky won’t be useful — it’s just to say that if you live in Phoenix, AZ you can stop reading.
### The Icon
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I was disappointed in the icon. For starters it’s blue (luckily there’s a lot of black). It has a border and uses the glossy overlay that Apple puts on by default. I don’t hate the icon, but it’s far from something that I even remotely like.
I can tolerate it, because the rest of the app outweighs its icon.
### The Forecast
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/dark-sky_003.PNG)
The heart and soul of this app is the main screen which is the forecast for the next hour. By default Dark Sky pulls up your current location, you can however specify a location if you like. I found that these locations are very sensitive, meaning the data seems to change even if you are only 10-15 miles from the last spot. That alone impressed me.
That’s not all, because Dark Sky does some very important things that are massively helpful:
– Tells you what it *thinks* the weather is currently doing. This I find is a good baseline for trusting the app. In my testing it is 100% accurate when it thinks the precipitation is light rain or heavier, but 50/50 when it thinks there is only a light sprinkle. I can’t fault that — rain here is very fickle.
– Tells you what to expect in the next hour. Sure lots of apps do this, but here’s how it tells you (examples from what I saw in usage): “Rain in 35 Minutes”; “Possible Sprinkling”; “Light Rain in 3 Min”. I found those little descriptions very helpful — they are the type of forecast that makes the data useable and I love that.
– The last bit on this screen is a little graph. This is the heart of the app — this is the power part of the app. This graph shows precipitation predictions for the next hour, but it does something even more clever: the graph tells you how confident it is in that prediction.#### Confidence
The confidence level in the predictions is the one thing that most apps seem to omit — likely because they pull their weather data from other sources and just display it. Here, Dark Sky is trying to tell you that it sees rain coming, but it’s not sure (or it is really sure, depending on the case). In my testing the app was always confident for the next 30 minutes and usually fairly confident through the hour.
So how does it show the confidence level? Easy. The graphs wiggles and shakes. The more wiggly and shaky the less confident the prediction.
I remember seeing [this video about the changes to the graph](http://vimeo.com/34575091) and I honestly think it was a very clever and intuitive way to design confidence levels into the app.
Overall this is great.
### The Radar
The radar is fantastic looking and it’s actually fast. You can manually move a time slider to animate the radar image and you can zoom in and out on a regional basis.
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/dark-sky_004.PNG)
I don’t use radar much, but I must admit that this radar is so pretty I find myself often just looking at it. (Especially true on the iPad.)
### Overall
Ok so I haven’t said a negative thing about the app other than the icon — so why isn’t this the perfect app for me? Easy,]: it’s a niche app. It’s great when I want to know about the next hour’s rain — which is 90% of the time — but horrible if I want to long term plan.
I can’t see beyond an hour, I can’t get the temp, wind, or sun forecasts. For everything this app does well, there are loads of things that, by design, the app does not do at all.
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/dark-sky_005.PNG)
Since I was previously using Apple’s Weather app I placed Dark Sky in its spot on the home screen and now just use the widget in notification center for the longer forecasts — this works well for me — but this is a trade-off.
I don’t want all the extra data crammed into [Dark Sky](http://darkskyapp.com/), but would it kill them to add at least the rest of the days worth of precipitation information? (e.g. “It gonna rain!”)
-
Range
Damn does this apply to everything. From personal to corporate, well said, Pat, well said.
-
Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover
Nice look at the latest, most enticing, entry into the iPad keyboard pool by Dan Frakes. I still love the Origami case, but a 6 month battery life? Well that’s pretty cool.
-
‘Cocktail Party Effect’ Identified in the Brain
Fascinating article about how humans are able to pick a voice out in a noisy room and focus on just that voice. It seems the researchers have a working algorithm for how the brain does this, and hope to implement it with voice recognition systems so that things like — oh I don’t know — Siri could better pick out *your* voice in a noisy room.
Amazing.
[via Next Draft] -
‘Skeumorphism & Storytelling’
Tobias Bjerrome Ahlin on the trend that I love to hate:
>The functionality of Paper and Brushes are basically the same, yet the perceived purpose is totally different.He makes some fantastic points in his post, be sure to read it — I can’t disagree with him.
-
Microsoft Reports: “Operating loss improvement”
I like MG Siegler’s take on that statement:
>That’s one way to put it.
-
‘Time and Taste’
Marco Arment:
>People who naturally *recognize* tasteful, well-designed products are a small subset of the population. But people who can *create* them are a much smaller subset.
Read this post.
-
Phil Schiller on Instagram
I know, I know, but it’s not the “jumped the shark” bit that is interesting. Take a look at the update on the bottom of this Mashable post because I’ve been hearing it a lot.
And you know what’s interesting about “signal to noise” comments when talking about Instagram? They’re the same comments that people started to say about Facebook when parents started signing up. Same comments people started making about Twitter a year plus ago.
It’s the complaint that early adopters make when a product is no longer “theirs”.
It’s a tough problem: growing and staying clutter free. Very few services succeed at finding a balance. Very few.
-
The B&B Podcast #57: Lottery Ticket Business Model
This week Shawn talks more about mechanical keyboards, shows us the filthy keyboard he bought on eBay, we talk about Pocket and what some people call “business models”. The episode is cut rather short as I had to jet for a family emergency — all is well now though.
-
Tumblr to Launch Ads Starting May 2
Sounds like they won’t be placing ads on the sites hosted there, but in the Radar section. Interesting.
[via 512px] -
Desktop-Class iOS Apps
Andy Ihnatko:
>Today, more and more developers are confident that the iPad is indeed a real computer, and are expressing that confidence by making desktop-class iOS apps – with Apple leading the way, of course. The new iPad edition of iPhoto isn’t just competitive with the desktop version, the tactile nature of the iPad makes it superior to most of the available consumer-grade image editors for Mac OS and Windows.He no longer lusts for an 11 MacBook Air, nor do I. With the iPad (3) in tow I don’t see much need for a MacBook Air. I am thinking of switching to two Mac minis: one for home, one for my office.
[via DF] -
Fake Instagram App Infects Android Devices With Malware
Graham Cluley:
>Tempted to try out the much talked about Instagram app? Well, be careful where you get it from – as malware authors are distributing malware disguised as the popular app.As much as people complain about Apple’s control over the App Store, things like this make me glad that Apple does control the App Store (Path address book mishaps notwithstanding).
-
Larry Page on Android
Reuters reporting on a statement from Google CEO Larry Page:
>Under questioning from Oracle’s lawyer, Page said Android was very important but disputed the notion that it was critical.Android has always been a means to an end: more ad impressions.
[via The Beard] -
Portland Man Goes Naked at PDX to Protest TSA Search
KGW News:
>”And the machine went off, and I asked what it was and he said ‘nitrates’ which I know from Oklahoma City is one of the explosive ingredients,” Brennan told KGW, “and I was not interested in being hassled so I took off my clothes to show them I was not carrying any explosives.”Politicians take note: this guy figured it would be easier to strip naked in the public airport, than to deal with the ridiculous power trip of TSA “officers”.
[via Julia Richert] -
Tweet of the Day: @Marcoarment
We don’t like free startups that figure out revenue later, so we’re making everything free and we’ll tell you about our revenue plan later.— Marco Arment (@marcoarment) April 18, 2012 -
Ruffled Feathers
I knew my post yesterday, [about my stance on “free” services](https://brooksreview.net/2012/04/viticci-free_not-as-in-he-needs-to-be-freed_like-free-as-in-a-business-model/), was likely to not go over very well with most people.
I knew that, but that’s not why I posted it.
I wrote that post because it is what I believe and I felt it needed to be said — if for no other reason than to be on record.
As such things do, the post generated a flurry of responses to me, here are some things that were said that I think bear repeating.
@BenjaminBrooks That’s where we disagree. Regular people don’t care about their attention as long as Facebook is free.
— Federico Viticci (@viticci) April 17, 2012
This lead to the normal argument of what “free” means. I say Facebook is not free because: ads distract and vie for attention, and Facebook uses your personal data for profit. The cost to the end user is not free because it is costing you attention and privacy — whether or not you accept that is up to you, but the cost is very real, if unseen. However, if free is simply what you have to pay monetarily to use something, then yes, it is free.
@viticci @BenjaminBrooks To many, it’s not even an illusion. For better or worse, many would much sooner part with attention than money.
— Ryan Wilson (@adudenamedRyan) April 17, 2012
Exactly, but you need to know this up front (more on this in a bit).
@viticci @BenjaminBrooks The word “free” clouds the discussion. It’s more about who the customer will be – the user or someone else.
— Greg Pierce (@agiletortoise) April 17, 2012
I’m impressed he fit this notion into 140 characters because it sums up the general misunderstanding on the web. Who is the customer? On this site my readers are (sadly) not my customer, nor are the advertisers. Fusion and The Syndicate are my customers — you the reader need to know that because even if I claim I am not swayed by it, that’s something that you, my user, need to judge for yourself. ((To that end I wish my readers were my customers, but that’s another post.))
[Marcelo Somers](http://behindcompanies.com/2012/04/pocket-the-free-anything-bucket-for-the-rest-of-us/):
>However, Pocket fails because from day one they don’t have the option of paying them for something. They hint that there are greater monetization options coming in the future, but users will kick and scream if their storage gets limited in the future, which is the natural business model that’s coming. It’s Dropbox and Evernote’s business model.
Somers is getting more to the point that I was making at the end of my post yesterday and I want to come back to this notion because [Matt Alexander](http://www.one37.net/blog/2012/4/18/misjudging-free.html) also hits on the same topic from a counter viewpoint:
>The presumption — without justification — that a company will *hurt* you and your interests betrays an infrastructure of fearful thinking. Moreover, it is not in keeping with the nature of the age in which we live.
I think this is where the larger misunderstanding took place. That I somehow think those that choose “free” business models are evil — I don’t think that — I think they are stupid. There’s a difference between the two and I know plenty of swell people that are also stupid — we all do. ((Most of us are just more polite than me and won’t admit someone is stupid. I am an ass, I think we all know this by now.))
When I ended yesterday’s post I cautioned:
>No service can remain free indefinitely and that’s why it is negligent not to question a new free service when it comes out, because “figure it out later” can often end up being something that you, the user, aren’t going to be OK with and that is relevant.
Somers was hitting on this, theorizing that in the case of Pocket they may limit certain aspects that were not previously limited — they may — and that probably would lead to backlash. ((But I think Somers is wrong about the Dropbox comparison because Dropbox has been limited from day one. It’s always been 2GB, or pay. That’s a sound model — that’s a model that works. That’s not free.)) And that is something the user should want to know upfront, because it may change whether they use the service or not. It’s why bait and switch laws are in place across the country — it’s deceitful to know that you will later try to force a customer into a paying customer by enticing them with a free something for a limited time.
I think Alexander assumes that when I made the above point, that I presume all “free” services will eventually be evil. That’s actually not what I was cautioning. Let me restate my caution with a touch more precision.
At some point every service must be paid for in one manner or another. This is true of all free services from Instagram to iCloud. Perhaps Instagram starts flooding your feed with ads, or iCloud requires you to buy the latest gear to be able to use it.
One way or another a free service must financially benefit those that run it, or that service will die.
Therefore, as a user, you need to be OK with the changes that may come, well before those changes occur, because the ramifications of those changes may be significant. You may be forced to pay, or the changes may be such that you no longer want to use the service at all — wishing you had never invested time into learning the service and integrating it into your life.
That’s what I meant when I said: “because “figure it out later” can often end up being something that you, the user, aren’t going to be OK with”.
What happens if you switch all your email correspondence to an iCloud account and next month Apple decides your iCloud account will cost you $99 a year? Ouch.
This is why I believe this debate is important.