Top Posts

Leica Sofort 2June 13, 2024
Grand Seiko SBGX261February 23, 2023

Recent Articles

  • Buyer’s Remorse Over Windows

    [This is one of those stories](http://www.inc.com/tech-blog/buyers-remorse-over-windows.html) that you read expecting it to happen like this: writer illogically chooses Windows, realizes Windows sucks, more pain, buys a Mac reluctantly, falls in love. Except that in this version the story stops short of the buying a new Mac part. It’s short and so let’s take a look…

    [This is one of those stories](http://www.inc.com/tech-blog/buyers-remorse-over-windows.html) that you read expecting it to happen like this: writer illogically chooses Windows, realizes Windows sucks, more pain, buys a Mac reluctantly, falls in love. Except that in this version the story stops short of the buying a new Mac part.

    It’s short and so let’s take a look at the story by [Renee Oricchio](http://www.inc.com/tech-blog/buyers-remorse-over-windows.html):

    >My original plan was to upgrade to a Macbook Air. In the end, I could not justify the expense or stomach the transition of moving from Windows to the Mac. I blinked and picked up a full-size Toshiba laptop with Windows 7 for $329.

    Wow, $329 is a price that I too think nothing could go wrong. ((Nope, that’s a lie.)) I am guessing you should have stuck to your original plan, but you didn’t ask me… Instead:

    >It will do what I need to it to do. It’s faster. The screen is bigger so it’s easier to navigate large spreadsheets, view streaming videos and put together PowerPoints.

    Ah, it *is* faster — I see now. I have also often heard that MacBook Airs are incapable of streaming videos and assembling PowerPoints’.

    >That being said, setting up my new laptop, transferring files and reloading my key applications killed most of my Sunday afternoon.

    Imagine how much longer that *slower* MacBook Air would have taken — weeks?

    >Before the sun set on the day of purchase, Windows 7 froze on me twice and I got the “blue screen of death” once.

    That’s what we call “user experience”, but at least the machine was $1000 cheaper.

    At this point Oricchio goes into some analogies about buying things to only have them break down on you instantly — all of which you think is leading to the inevitable Mac purchase, but:

    >There are two infallible truths about PCs.

    This is going to be good…

    >When Apple creates a product; the end user’s experience comes first, but they charge a King’s ransom for it.

    I agree with you right up and until the “King’s ransom” part. Truth be told Apple just charges a reasonable price to make a great computer that doesn’t — oh I don’t know — crash. I won’t waste more time on this, but suffice to say there are a lot of people that think this are have also been proven wrong time and time again.

    >When Microsoft creates a product; it’s all about what new code (features) can we slap on top of the old clunky, Byzantine code and call it an upgrade?

    Wait are you asking me, or telling me? Either way: I disagree.

    >And oh yeah, how cheap can we pressure the PC makers to keep their prices down? It is their only edge over the competition.

    And *you* fell right into the trap even though you know better.

    Now there is only one sentence left in the article, one, typically this is the one that says something like: “So I bought a Mac and it just works.” We have all read these stories, but not this time — not for Oricchio, nope:

    >Mom was right; you do get what you pay for.

    What? There’s quite a few things I don’t get here not the least of which is what I am supposed to glean from this “conclusion”.

    What’s the resolution to the brand new crappy, but “fast”, computer that you just purchased?

    If you “get what you pay for” does that not mean that in actuality you were incorrect in stating the “King’s ransom” bit about Apple laptops?

    And if not, then do you not value you all the time you will waste “maintaining” your fancy, “fast”, new, $329, competitive edge, laptop?

    You do know that you can return stuff right, specifically for reasons like “it crashed the first day”?

    Are you aware that anytime I see your name as the author I will now skip past the article?

    Well now you know and knowing is half the battle.

  • What Tiny Thing in Lion Makes You Smile or Has Caught You Off Guard?

    A great thread of the improvements in Lion that really make it shine. There are more than a few that I hadn’t noticed/didn’t know about. [via Daniel Jalkut]

    A great thread of the improvements in Lion that really make it shine. There are more than a few that I hadn’t noticed/didn’t know about.

  • Review: Sparrow

    When [Sparrow](http://sparrowmailapp.com/) came out I was pretty annoyed that it copied the look and feel of Tweetie so I consciously decided not to download it. This in addition to the fact that (like switching task apps) switching email apps is very disruptive to my workflow I decided not to try it at all. Lately though…

    When [Sparrow](http://sparrowmailapp.com/) came out I was pretty annoyed that it copied the look and feel of Tweetie so I consciously decided not to download it. This in addition to the fact that (like switching task apps) switching email apps is very disruptive to my workflow I decided not to try it at all. Lately though I have been seeing/reading/hearing from too many people that I respect whom have really taken to Sparrow.

    I decided to give it a try.

    I have been using it now for over a week and I think I have enough usage that I feel comfortable telling you my take as a hardcore Mail.app user.

    It’s good, but it’s not better than Mail.app as an email app — yet I am switching to it. I can’t quite put my finger on it, it’s not the design of the app or the hideous icon — there is a lack of power in the app, yet I don’t miss the power.

    I asked a couple of people that use the app why they like it better than Mail.app to see what I was missing, here’s what they told me.

    [Chris Bowler](http://chrisbowler.com):

    >Mail and Sparrow are close, but the integration of keyboard commands & more configurable interface make Sparrow the better choice.

    Here’s what [Justin Blanton](http://hypertext.net/) had to say:

    >It makes me hate email less. It’s prettier, simpler and just more fun to use. Also, for whatever reason, it makes me feel less guilty about firing off very short replies.

    So while Chris seemed to have a “productive” reason for liking Sparrow, Justin has a more emotional response to the app — a response that I completely “get”.

    When I use Sparrow I don’t feel like I am using a *real* email application, because it doesn’t look a feel like a *real* email application. It feels more akin to email on my iPad — robust, but not *the* tool. It’s an odd sensation that I am just now coming to terms with.

    Chris is right in saying that there are a lot of little things in Sparrow that make it a very nice app — not the least of which is allowing ‘send and archive’ without having to invoke third party utilities. Sparrow just has a lot of common sense things in it, but it is sorely lacking in the bottom-posted email support…

    I can’t say I have done my job as a reviewer unless I note some very really problems I have with this app, so here they are:

    – **Bottom-posting**: You can’t do it automatically and I didn’t find a plugin or workaround on the net. What year is this? Instead I whipped up a Keyboard Maestro macro to bottom post emails replies for me — with the added benefit of it working better than my Mail.app hacks.
    – **Multiple Email Accounts**: This still very much feels like an app designed for no more than two email accounts. The reason being: the avatars for each account. The sidebar is just bad. Where the pictures would be cute for users that only have a couple of email accounts — what picture am I to use for my business? What about this blog where I have three different email accounts? The avatar thing is just odd. (Yes I know about the extended sidebar, but it is hideous.)
    – The icon is *really* bad.
    – I wish I could turn off or change some of the colors the app uses, particularly the green. Not a fan of that shade of green.

    As you can see my complaints about this app are pretty minor and that is because of the apps greatest strength: keeping you out of the app (which keeps me from noticing too much).

    ### Why I Like Sparrow

    I mentioned this earlier but Sparrow really feels like using the simplicity of an iOS email app on your Mac. What’s good about that is it makes me feel (as Justin said) fine with shooting off shorter replies — the same feeling I have when using my iPhone or iPad to respond to emails — which in turn means I reply more promptly.

    I don’t hate the Sparrow interface, but I doubt that it will ever truly feel like ’email’ to me — that’s a good thing. In Mail.app I was constantly checking folders, tweaking rules, and staring at emails. In Sparrow I usually only look at the combined inbox and then I search for everything else — Mail.app has a nice search engine in Lion, but so does Sparrow. The biggest difference is that Sparrow encourages the use of search and all but forces a user to forget about “filing” their email.

    Thank you. Well done.

    ### Closing Arguments

    Mail.app is a better email app: it’s more powerful, has more add-ons, is free, and you can hack on it more. Sparrow is a better app for replying to emails — it’s not an email app so much as it is a communication widget. Sparrow feels weak, but it isn’t weak. It feels gimmicky, but it *still* works.

    If you go into Sparrow thinking that it’s just another email app then you are already predisposed to hating it. If you go into using Sparrow with the mindset that you hate email and want to spend as little time emailing as you can — well you just may be surprised, I was.

    ### Tips

    Here’s how I am bottom posting:

    Basically I set this to trigger only in Sparrow when the `Command+R` keyboard shortcut is pressed.

    And one tip to make things look better: turn off the sidebar and stick with the unified inbox with search to find ‘old’ emails.

    ### Still Missing

    A Clip-o-tron for OmniFocus — this is really, really missing.

  • The Desktop Transition

    Michael Lopp on Exposé in Lion: >How would you react if, whenever you were wondering where something was on your desktop, I’d show up, pull every single thing off it and show it to you in a manner completely different from how you organized it? The above so perfectly explains why I was never a…

    Michael Lopp on Exposé in Lion:
    >How would you react if, whenever you were wondering where something was on your desktop, I’d show up, pull every single thing off it and show it to you in a manner completely different from how you organized it?

    The above so perfectly explains why I was never a huge fan of Exposé.

  • “Microsoft.com is a terrible website”

    Bill Gates in an email to Jim Allchin from 2003 describing his experience trying to download and install Moviemaker from Microsoft’s website: >So after more than an hour of craziness and making my programs list garbage and being scared and seeing that Microsoft com is a terrible website I haven’t run Moviemaker and I haven’t…

    Bill Gates in an email to Jim Allchin from 2003 describing his experience trying to download and install Moviemaker from Microsoft’s website:
    >So after more than an hour of craziness and making my programs list garbage and being scared and seeing that Microsoft com is a terrible website I haven’t run Moviemaker and I haven’t got the plus package

    Can you imagine getting an email like that from your boss, let alone if your boss was Bill Gates?

  • [SPONSOR] PostCheck

    PostCheck adds additional functionality to Apple’s Address Book. With one click, PostCheck will fill in missing parts of your addresses, such as ZIP+4 Codes, as well as format your addresses to conform to USPS standards. Whether you manage a mailing list, send clients invoices, or just like a neatly organized address book… PostCheck can save…

    PostCheck adds additional functionality to Apple’s Address Book. With one click, PostCheck will fill in missing parts of your addresses, such as ZIP+4 Codes, as well as format your addresses to conform to USPS standards.

    Whether you manage a mailing list, send clients invoices, or just like a neatly organized address book… PostCheck can save you a lot of time and help the Post Office get your mail to it’s destination quicker.

    Read more about the benefits of PostCheck and download the demo on the [PostCheck website](http://briantoth.com/postcheck/).

  • Full Screen Shortcut

    Great tip, I went with `CMD+CTRL+F`.

    Great tip, I went with `CMD+CTRL+F`.

  • Camels and Rubber Duckies

    Joel Spolsky on software pricing from 2004. Reading this last night I couldn’t help but think about the effect that App Stores have had on pricing of software since Spolsky wrote this piece. Seems that software en masse when the $0.05 route. [via Amitava B]

    Joel Spolsky on software pricing from 2004. Reading this last night I couldn’t help but think about the effect that App Stores have had on pricing of software since Spolsky wrote this piece. Seems that software en masse when the $0.05 route.

    [via Amitava B]
  • The New Home Button on the iPhone 5 (Allegedly)

    Dan Provost on the rumored iPhone 5 home button redesign: >The home button is special. In it’s purest form, it is not used to manipulate what is happening on the screen, but to manipulate the apps themselves (in most cases, closing them and returning to the home screen). His entire post is worth a read…

    Dan Provost on the rumored iPhone 5 home button redesign:
    >The home button is special. In it’s purest form, it is not used to manipulate what is happening on the screen, but to manipulate the apps themselves (in most cases, closing them and returning to the home screen).

    His entire post is worth a read and a fantastic look at how Apple likely thinks about the home button.

  • Quote of the Day: Allison Arieff

    “When’s the last time you had a creative breakthrough in a Monday morning meeting? Creativity springs from unexpected places and sources — from a walk in the park to the rare block of uninterrupted time — so thinking more broadly about the intrinsic motivations (autonomy, learning, etc.) that facilitate good work is likely to have…

    “When’s the last time you had a creative breakthrough in a Monday morning meeting? Creativity springs from unexpected places and sources — from a walk in the park to the rare block of uninterrupted time — so thinking more broadly about the intrinsic motivations (autonomy, learning, etc.) that facilitate good work is likely to have a far happier outcome than the “latest” innovation in cubicles.”
  • AT&T to Implement Data Throttling in Early October

    Cleve Nettles: >Rumored to be starting in the first week of October, we’ve heard that AT&T will start throttling the data speeds of the network’s top data hogs. Sure AT&T is spotty and not great as a company, but if done correctly (and it sounds as though it will be) it should help out the…

    Cleve Nettles:
    >Rumored to be starting in the first week of October, we’ve heard that AT&T will start throttling the data speeds of the network’s top data hogs.

    Sure AT&T is spotty and not great as a company, but if done correctly (and it sounds as though it will be) it should help out the overall network quality.

  • Brew Review

    My thanks to the Brew Review for sponsoring the RSS feed this week. If you are a beer drinker that constantly forgets which beers he likes (let’s face it there are a lot of micro brews out there) then this is an app you need. It has a tons of features for the beer obsessed…

    My thanks to the Brew Review for sponsoring the RSS feed this week. If you are a beer drinker that constantly forgets which beers he likes (let’s face it there are a lot of micro brews out there) then this is an app you need.

    It has a tons of features for the beer obsessed and yet still works great for a guy like me that just logs the name of beer and whether it was enjoyable or not. Be sure to support them and check out the app — I’ve found it very handy.

  • It Just Doesn’t Work

    Harry McCracken: >All of which brings me back to Apple. Heaven knows, it often ships products that don’t include all the features an average consumer might want. But even when its products don’t “just work” in a way that feels practically mystical, they do work. What does it say about the state of the tech…

    Harry McCracken:
    >All of which brings me back to Apple. Heaven knows, it often ships products that don’t include all the features an average consumer might want. But even when its products don’t “just work” in a way that feels practically mystical, they do work. What does it say about the state of the tech industry that this comes as a refreshing surprise?

    This is a really good read that highlights a problem that has only been brought about due to the proliferation easy updates and acceptance of ‘beta’ labels.

    [via DF]
  • Twitter’s Adam Bain Talks Promoted Tweets in Timelines

    MG Siegler interviewing Adam Bain about Twitter’s promoted tweets in timelines: >When I ask about the importance of exclusivity for the deals Twitter is offering (that is, will only Twitter get to offer them?), Bain says that it’s important to note that Promoted Tweets aren’t just about deals or offers — he doesn’t want this…

    MG Siegler interviewing Adam Bain about Twitter’s promoted tweets in timelines:
    >When I ask about the importance of exclusivity for the deals Twitter is offering (that is, will only Twitter get to offer them?), Bain says that it’s important to note that Promoted Tweets aren’t just about deals or offers — he doesn’t want this product thought of as “Twitter Deals”. “That’s one of a bunch of categories that consumers find interesting,” he says. “More than half of our launch is about exclusive content,” he says.

    That addresses my biggest frustration with ads on websites: ad exclusivity. I hate it when I know that I *could* see that ad on another site. What a valuable thing Twitter is doing here. ((My entire commentary is called: *sarcasm*.))

  • Page Speed Service

    An interesting project from Google to try and speed up the web for the entire world — for free. There are some real concerns with allowing Google to do that, but as any nerd I was more interested in how much faster they could make TBR. [Here are the results](https://f3a98a5aca88d28ed629-2f664c0697d743fb9a738111ab4002bd.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/pagespeedservice.png). ((Don’t see myself using it…

    An interesting project from Google to try and speed up the web for the entire world — for free. There are some real concerns with allowing Google to do that, but as any nerd I was more interested in how much faster they could make TBR.

    [Here are the results](https://f3a98a5aca88d28ed629-2f664c0697d743fb9a738111ab4002bd.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/pagespeedservice.png). ((Don’t see myself using it any time soon.))

  • Quickly Changing Volume on a Password Protected iPhone

    So clever. Addresses one of my biggest iOS annoyances — well at the very least makes it less frustrating.

    So clever. Addresses one of my biggest iOS annoyances — well at the very least makes it less frustrating.

  • Broadband Performance Study Finds Huge Regional Disparities in US

    Ryan Paul: >Comcast had the highest average download speed at 890KBps and Verizon came in second with 788KBps. A separate comparison of mobile broadband providers found that AT&T was the fastest at 416KBps and Verizon was the slowest of the major providers at 216KBps. My own usage agrees with the above, with one major caveat:…

    Ryan Paul:
    >Comcast had the highest average download speed at 890KBps and Verizon came in second with 788KBps. A separate comparison of mobile broadband providers found that AT&T was the fastest at 416KBps and Verizon was the slowest of the major providers at 216KBps.

    My own usage agrees with the above, with one major caveat: when it works. AT&T and Comcast are incredibly fast… when they work.

  • How I Evaluate and Decide to Purchase New iOS Apps

    My mind was wandering the other day and I began trying to figure out why some of my favorite iOS apps aren’t in the top rated sections of the App Stores. First a note: All of this is based off of my own perceptions and experiences — coupled with my observations of other users. There…

    My mind was wandering the other day and I began trying to figure out why some of my favorite iOS apps aren’t in the top rated sections of the App Stores.

    First a note: All of this is based off of my own perceptions and experiences — coupled with my observations of other users. There is no science here.

    As I see it there are three main ways that people come across new iOS apps:

    – Outside source (web site, friends, advertising) directing them to an app (likely recommending it).
    – Browsing the app store (top charts, categories, genius suggestions) looking for new apps.
    – Searching for a specific app, or type of app to fill some void.

    With outside sources you are coming to the app with intent to get that app (most of the time). Those that are willing to pay will likely buy that app as soon as they are sure that it is the one recommended to them by whomever sent them to the app. This is the easiest sale for an iOS app: the user who comes directly to the app.

    Browsing users are quite different. These users are likely skimming through long lists of apps looking for two things: something to pop out at them, and names/brands they recognize. With browsing users a developer only gets four ways to sell the app to a potential customer:

    – Icon
    – Name
    – Rating
    – Price

    Take one look through the top charts at the apps that you have never tried and you will get an idea for just how limiting those four factors are. These are the four ways that a developer can get a user to click on the app for more information and details.

    Searching shoppers are coming with intent to fill a need that they currently have and need filled now. They use the following to help decide which app is right for them:

    – Name
    – Icon
    – Price
    – Rating
    – Screenshots
    – Description

    One thing you will note is that I have intentionally left out reviews. Personally I don’t think they are very worthwhile and of the people that do look at them — typically those are people that are looking for a reason *not* to buy your app. ((Free apps don’t count here, why you wouldn’t just “buy” it and try it for yourself I don’t know.))

    All is not equal though with these buying decisions. For the last two types of buyers I think you can prioritize the importance of each decision criteria, but first we need to better understand the price factor.

    ### Pricing

    It doesn’t matter if your app is $0.99 or $99, if someone doesn’t want to pay for the app, they are not going to pay for the app, no matter the price.

    You cannot change this.

    If someone is willing to pay for an app you have three categories they fall in: ninety-nine-centers, willing buyers, and me.

    #### Ninety-nine-centers

    They finally realized how much ads suck, but are still only willing to pay $0.99 — because after all it is *just* an iOS app.

    #### Willing Buyers

    These are people that are pretty willing to fork over the cost of a double tall Starbucks latte to get a decent app. They are likely to be fine paying up to $2.99 for an app, with $4.99 being the upper limits of comfort and impulse buys for them.

    #### Me

    This is the group of nerds that prefers to pay and is willing to pay more than $19.99 for an excellent app. These are your ideal customers — they are anyones ideal customers.

    ### Priorities

    As I mentioned above each buyer is more likely to pay attention to the following when making a buying decision via browsing:

    – Icon
    – Name
    – Rating
    – Price

    Now that list is probably ordered incorrectly as far as what matters the most, it should read like this:

    – Icon
    – Price
    – Name
    – Rating

    The icon is what will catch the browsing users eye and cause them to stop. The price comes second because that only matters to users who don’t like to pay, from there the other items are of little consequence.

    With buyers who are searching for apps things happen a little differently:

    – Name
    – Icon
    – Price
    – Description
    – Screenshots
    – Rating

    Let’s break down the psychology of these priorities a little bit.

    ##### Name

    The name is going to tell the person if they have found what they are actually looking for via search. ‘Dropbox’ is a fine search, but will result in a lot of options to choose from because of all the Dropbox enable text editors out there.

    However names start to become irrelevant when you are searching for something not brand specific like: ‘notes’.

    ##### Icon

    This is your opportunity to make a good first impression, giving the user an idea of the level of design your app has. If I am searching for a weather app, there are going to be a ton of results and the names will be pretty meaningless. Thus I am more likely to check out the app icon that I like best first.

    This is important because if the app I try first meets all my needs I will have little reason to come back and look at the other apps.

    ##### Price

    Simple: am I willing to pay X to fill need Y? Not much you can do here, as discussed above.

    ##### Description

    Most of the time when I am searching for an app to fill a need, I am looking for a specific feature. Can I quickly see if that feature is listed in the description?

    I tend to prefer straight bullet points here, unless it is an app that I am not likely to see the value in with out the developer telling it to me. For example: Instagram, Instapaper, Dialvetica, Capture.

    ##### Screenshots

    These are actually tied with the description in priority in my book, but I put the after descriptions because I know a bunch of people that never look at them.

    These are especially important for visual apps like weather apps. People are looking to see if this is an app they want to use and if it looks straightforward.

    ##### Rating

    Smart iOS buyers know that reviewers and ratings are horse shit.

    However I know a lot of people that won’t even download an app that has less than three stars. Where this starts to matter for someone like me is when there are multiple apps that are very similar and all cost money. Ratings (not reviews) then come into play for which app I try first (and if I like the first app I try I am likely not to come back an try others).

    Again this is guess work by me, but this is how I and others that I have talked to think about iOS purchasing. That leaves one big thing: reviews.

    ### Reviews

    A smart buyer knows that reviews are not trustworthy and thus ignores them. What about the rest of the market?

    From what I have read on the web and in talking to others: the negative reviews seem to matter, but only to a small degree.

    Someone who wants to buy your app, will buy your app regardless of the reviews. The people who are on the fence about your app, or your apps pricing, are the ones that you are at risk of losing with poor reviews.

    That is: if I only am comfortable paying $0.99 for your app, but it is priced at $1.99 I will be looking for a reason *not* to buy your app. “Oh John left a terrible review, says app is worthless — yeah *not* buying that now.” As if I ever was going to buy it.

    This is also likely the same person, that if they do buy your app, puts you at risk of getting a review from them that says: “One star, over priced. Everything else is amazing though.”

    ### Lessons

    I am not a developer and though the above seems very logical it doesn’t explain the popularity of some apps:

    What I have learned is that there are two categories of apps that seemingly defy all logic: free apps and games.

    As evidenced in the above screenshot a free app that many don’t think is very good is still rated #6 in the top free apps — #6. Yet, it’s free and the app title seem pretty exciting: free TV, on my iPhone? Why not. Well because it sucks. ((That’s my official review of the app.))

    Games are an entirely different beast, one that I just can’t even pretend to understand.

    ### Long and Short of It

    Make a nice icon, price it at $2.99 with a detailed description. Wait for reviews that say it is too much money, but gain smart loyal users.

    Either that or give it away free.

  • MacBook Airs and ‘Storage’ Sizes

    Sorry for linking to myself here, but since saying the MacBook Pro 13″ makes no sense I have had a deluge of emails and tweets. Two common arguments I am hearing are: RAM and storage space. The RAM limitation is legitimate and 4GB versus 8GB *is* a huge difference. However I stand by this (which…

    Sorry for linking to myself here, but since saying the MacBook Pro 13″ makes no sense I have had a deluge of emails and tweets. Two common arguments I am hearing are: RAM and storage space.

    The RAM limitation is legitimate and 4GB versus 8GB *is* a huge difference. However I stand by this (which is what I am linking to) with regards to the storage space:

    >There is certainly a large contingent of Mac users that have an overwhelming amount of data storage needs, but if you fall in that group than I doubt that even a 500GB hard drive will suffice for you.

    That’s to say that if you can’t get it done in 256GBs then you likely need more than 500GBs too.

  • Quote of the Day: John Gruber

    “It’s a corrupting revenue model.” — John Gruber

    “It’s a corrupting revenue model.”