Top Posts


Recent Articles

  • Bad Connection: Inside the iPhone Network Meltdown

    Fred Vogelstein has written an incredibly interesting article on the Apple and AT&T relationship, if you don’t have time to read the whole thing (you should make time) take a look at these choices quotes: They’d always end up saying, ‘We’re going to have to escalate this to senior AT&T executives,’ and we always said,…

    Fred Vogelstein has written an incredibly interesting article on the Apple and AT&T relationship, if you don’t have time to read the whole thing (you should make time) take a look at these choices quotes:

    They’d always end up saying, ‘We’re going to have to escalate this to senior AT&T executives,’ and we always said, ‘Fine, we’ll escalate it to Steve and see who wins.’ I think history has demonstrated how that turned out.”

    and

    Even more irksome to AT&T, though, has been Apple’s relative silence in the face of thousands of frustrated customers. “AT&T went in thinking the deal was a true partnership: ‘We’re in this together, and we defend each other throughout.’ That wasn’t the way Apple did things at all,” says someone who worked on the project for AT&T. “We’d say, ‘Let’s resolve these issues together,’ and they’d say, ‘No, you resolve them. They’re not our problem. They’re your problem.’”

    and

    Even if AT&T had wanted to respond with iPhone ads, Apple would have refused. “Put yourself in Apple’s shoes,” says an Apple executive involved in those conversations. “The reason the Verizon ads were so effective wasn’t because of the iPhone. It was because of AT&T’s network. We would have been letting them use the iPhone to put lipstick on a pig.”

    and lastly

    Jobs and his team would continue to discuss switching to Verizon, but these were always short conversations. “Every time the issue of switching came up, it always seemed to cause as many problems as it solved,” according to a source who attended some of these meetings.

  • Paid Comments, Do They Make Sense?

    I posted a link about a newspaper site that will begin charging readers to leave comments. The fee is nominal ($0.99 one time) and the idea is noble. The basic theory operating behind this idea is that requiring people to use their real (full) names (and verify that by making them pay with a credit…

    I posted a link about a newspaper site that will begin charging readers to leave comments. The fee is nominal ($0.99 one time) and the idea is noble. The basic theory operating behind this idea is that requiring people to use their real (full) names (and verify that by making them pay with a credit card) the quality of all the comments go up. Instead of comments looking like YouTube’s they look like those that people used to mail to editors.

    The Concept

    The paper will charge customers $0.99 to register – registration allows them to leave comments on the stories. Registration and the fees are one time only and must be paid using a credit card in the registrants name. Once registered users will not be able to change the name that is displayed when they leave a comment – it is the billing name that will be shown.

    Due to this verified identity schema the paper believes that people will be more apt to leave comments of an intelligent and insightful (read: helpful) nature. Instead of just berating the journalist or the politician being talked about with slang and put-downs – actual evidence will be presented. This is all based on the idea that people are vain and when they can be called on something they said (in real life now) they will want to portray a sensible and smart self.

    Thus in the end you have a cleaner commenting system, requiring less moderation and further engaging the readers of the story. In essence you have brought back the relevance of comments.

    My Guess at the Reality

    I think that very few people would argue that the above seems like the end goal of comments – make them relevant and engaging. However reality is much different from the concept. Conceptually we assume that people are smart and care about what people think of them. Further assume that no one will pay $0.99 to tell the writer that they suck.

    In reality all people are not smart, and a lot of people simply do not care what others think of them. So what is stopping them from paying less than a dollar for the privilege of flaming on? Further we assume that people want to sound intelligent that thus will try to be intelligent. Have we forgotten that most people do indeed believe they are smart and (worse yet) right?

    Have you ever tried to argue with someone that is completely miss informed about a situation and yet they believe whole heartedly that they are correct and you are nuts? It is painful and frustrating to do – these are the people leaving most of the problem comments. They will not go away with paid commenting solutions. This of course is not to imply that what they add to a conversation is hurtful, just that what they add to a conversation is not necessarily productive or the desired outcome.

    Which brings us to perhaps the most contentious point of paid commenting systems – how do you moderate a paid comment? If someone is paying you to be able to comment on your article, can you then still remove the comment if you don’t find it tasteful? Certainly there are terms of service agreements, but that means you then need legal to step in and explain why a comment was removed. Given the sheer amount of poor comments this could prove to be quite a challenge, both fiscally and manpower wise.

    The Real Problem

    Comments are more noise than they are valuable. Let me offer and analogy: we all love Freeways even though they are incredibly noisy, they provide great value in moving us long distances in a short(er) periods of time. Comments though are like a Freeway that doesn’t take you anywhere you want to go – pointless and noisy.

    The solution being proposed then is to change all the Freeways into Toll-ways where people now must pay to use them. The problem is that you will now have less noise, but you still won’t be going anywhere you want to go. You have only solved 50% of the problem. Comments won’t be great until you can foster an environment where people leave useful/constructive/informative/interesting comments.

    The only way to get great comments is to take away the soapbox. That is the reason more and more blogs are moving away from comments that appear directly on the article to a commenting system where readers email the writer. I am all ears when people email me comments, or hit me up on Twitter it is really no different that having to send a letter to the editor. I take away the soapbox to remove the noise and make sure that we are going somewhere – this is the only model that currently works.

  • Apple Peddling Revised iPhone 4s Through Genius Bar Replacements?

    I would ignore this on most blogs, but Stephen M. Hackett used to be an Apple Genius (still is, just not employed as one) and given that he has pretty good sources on this matter.

    I would ignore this on most blogs, but Stephen M. Hackett used to be an Apple Genius (still is, just not employed as one) and given that he has pretty good sources on this matter.

  • Times’ Paid Model: The Unofficial Numbers Come In

    Robert Andrews: The registration wall, despite being free for a month, resulted in site visits declining by 58 percent. By the time actual payments had been required for a week, visits were down by 67 percent, compared with the old days. This won’t worry many at the paper, since the whole strategy is about courting…

    Robert Andrews:

    The registration wall, despite being free for a month, resulted in site visits declining by 58 percent. By the time actual payments had been required for a week, visits were down by 67 percent, compared with the old days.

    This won’t worry many at the paper, since the whole strategy is about courting fewer, more loyal users. And it’s a darn sight better than the 90 percent drop-off that many, including The Times’ editor, have braced for.

    I saw numbers popping up about this over the weekend however they were on the Financial Times which I could not see due to a paywall. This is a huge drop, time will tell if the model is lucrative or not.

  • Consumers Reports’s ‘Recommended’ Smartphones, July 2010

    John Gruber: Curiously, Consumer Reports’s list of “Recommended” smartphones includes all of the smartphones suffering from “holding it wrong” attenuation I’ve linked to tonight (Palm Pre, HTC Incredible, Nexus One, BlackBerry 9650) as well as three of the phones Apple posted videos about (iPhone 3GS, Droid Eris, BlackBerry 9700). I’d link directly to Consumer Reports’s…

    John Gruber:

    Curiously, Consumer Reports’s list of “Recommended” smartphones includes all of the smartphones suffering from “holding it wrong” attenuation I’ve linked to tonight (Palm Pre, HTC Incredible, Nexus One, BlackBerry 9650) as well as three of the phones Apple posted videos about (iPhone 3GS, Droid Eris, BlackBerry 9700). I’d link directly to Consumer Reports’s web page for this list, but can’t, because it’s behind a paywall that their coverage of the iPhone 4 antenna is not. I’m sure they’ve been performing the exact same attenuation testing with all of these phones that they have with the iPhone 4, and that they have published precise technical standards regarding how much attenuation is acceptable to still qualify for a “Recommended” rating.

    Consumer Reports is bullshit and if you are looking at them for recommendations then you are never going to have the best current phone, only the best phone from last year. I saw Gruber’s links flying in yesterday about all the other smartphones that have attenuation when held and that even some say not to hold the phones in a certain way – this is a great wrap up of this whole iPhone 4 antenna B.S.. I was asked five times this weekend about the antenna on my iPhone – I told each person I never had a problem. These people didn’t even know what the problem was, just that there is a recall – people are so mis-informed on the matter that it hurts my brain trying to comprehend the blind sheep following each other mentality.

  • The Real Damage – How much does that really cost?

    If you are caring credit card debt, this is a must look at before you make another purchase. (via The Consumerist)

    If you are caring credit card debt, this is a must look at before you make another purchase.

    (via The Consumerist)

  • iPhone 4 Press Conference – The Post-Game Wrapup

    Andy Ihnatko: Steve Jobs didn’t fall to his knees, rend his garment, clasp his hands together, and beg for forgiveness from users and stockholders. This has upset many people. These people are idiots. (via Daring Fireball)

    Andy Ihnatko:

    Steve Jobs didn’t fall to his knees, rend his garment, clasp his hands together, and beg for forgiveness from users and stockholders.

    This has upset many people.

    These people are idiots.


    (via Daring Fireball)

  • ‘Junkware’ comes standard on Verizon, T-Mobile smart phones

    Mark Milian: The software from the struggling movie retail chain includes a store locator and a section to download mobile movies from Blockbuster’s catalog. This app cannot be uninstalled from the phone’s software library using any traditional means. Users can delete it from the home screen, but it lives on — permanently part of the…

    Mark Milian:

    The software from the struggling movie retail chain includes a store locator and a section to download mobile movies from Blockbuster’s catalog. This app cannot be uninstalled from the phone’s software library using any traditional means. Users can delete it from the home screen, but it lives on — permanently part of the software embedded on the device.

    Sounds an awful lot like buying a Windows PC from – oh from anybody really except that you can install that crap on Windows. Open must be really swell.

  • Text messages – 6,500% markup

    This is old news, but it was on my nerves the other day so I though I would post it to remind us all. Julianne Pepitone: But on a pay-per-text plan, the 160-character messages typically cost 20 cents outgoing and 10 cents incoming. That’s a markup of as much as 6,500%.

    This is old news, but it was on my nerves the other day so I though I would post it to remind us all.

    Julianne Pepitone:

    But on a pay-per-text plan, the 160-character messages typically cost 20 cents outgoing and 10 cents incoming. That’s a markup of as much as 6,500%.

  • Apple – Smartphone Antenna Performance

    Interesting that they made a page with videos of competitors products. Be sure to hit the link at the bottom for a look at their testing labs – impressive.

    Interesting that they made a page with videos of competitors products. Be sure to hit the link at the bottom for a look at their testing labs – impressive.

  • Steve Jobs Gives Consumer Reports the Bird

    Today Apple CEO Steve Jobs took the stage at a press conference to talk about the iPhone 4 antenna issues. In case you missed the 15 minute presentation here is what Jobs said (paraphrased by yours truly): “This new iPhone has killer reception even after we corrected the bars being displayed – in fact this…

    Today Apple CEO Steve Jobs took the stage at a press conference to talk about the iPhone 4 antenna issues. In case you missed the 15 minute presentation here is what Jobs said (paraphrased by yours truly):

    “This new iPhone has killer reception even after we corrected the bars being displayed – in fact this new phone is so good that there are less returns and more sales than we ever expected. There is a problem but every smart phone we tried has this problem. To make this right everyone gets free cases and we will refund money to those who bought a case already (bumper cases). Also be sure to check out this futuristic chamber that we test the iPhone in so that you can see just how serious we are at Apple.”

    Consumer Reports forced Jobs to give out cases for free – in fact the media as a whole forced this, so you can thank them for your free case. The egg however has shifted from being on Apple’s face to being on the media’s, specifically Consumer Reports’ face. Apple didn’t provide a ton of data showing that the iPhone is fine even given the problems with the antenna (they did show some) – what Jobs really showed was that the antenna problem is a non-issue as evidenced by the sales, returns, and lack of dropped call increase (the increase Jobs showed really is not statistically significant).

    Basically if you got Consumer Reports and Jobs in a room here is how the discussion would play out:

    CR: This new iPhone is better than anything else.

    Jobs: I agree, our best phone yet.

    CR: Yeah it tops our charts, but what is this about Gizmodo saying the antenna is flawed?

    Jobs: It’s not flawed, they are showing something that happens to all phones. There is no problem.

    CR: Just because it happens to all phones doesn’t mean that there is no problem.

    Jobs: Still the iPhone is less problematic than other phones. Just put a bumper case on it and all will be fine.

    CR: Well we tested the problem by watching over 30 YouTube videos, so given all that data there is just no way we can recommend this phone to our 10 readers. We will write an article about this and send it to you and every email address we can.

    Jobs: Isn’t your job to tell consumers to buy the best products?

    CR: That is what we do everyday.

    Jobs: But you said this is the best phone and here is a crap load of data to support the fact that this problem is being blown out of proportion. (insert press conference data)

    CR: Can’t change now – we are get way to much attention about our article.

    Jobs: OK here is my AMEX I will buy you and every iPhone 4 owner a case.

    CR: …

    Jobs: One more thing… (uses left hand to give them the bird) Boom.

    Yeah that conversation sounds about right to me.

  • iOS 4.0.1 tweaks bar display, doesn’t fix signal drop

    Great chart showing how the signal is now calculated as compared to before.

    Great chart showing how the signal is now calculated as compared to before.

  • Thoughts on the iPhone 4 Apple Press Conference

    Not to beat a dead horse, but as many of you are aware tomorrow Apple will be holding a press conference about the iPhone 4 at their Cupertino campus. Nobody knows what will be said, but I think it is pretty given that CEO Steve Jobs will be there himself. What I do want to…

    Not to beat a dead horse, but as many of you are aware tomorrow Apple will be holding a press conference about the iPhone 4 at their Cupertino campus. Nobody knows what will be said, but I think it is pretty given that CEO Steve Jobs will be there himself.

    What I do want to say is that short of a recall or handing out something for free (i.e. gift cards or bumper cases) I doubt that anything that happens will be all that earth shattering. People who are upset by the iPhone antenna are not going to be satisfied by anything that is said, and it is not going that change anything that is going on today. That is unless there is a recall or something along those lines.

    In a roundabout way I do expect Jobs to dismiss the Bloomberg report that he was warned of such issues. The problem is that executives are warned about things all the time and 99% of the time these things never happen or are stopped before they do. This is the 1% case scenario and it will be really interesting for every PR person to watch how Apple handles this case.

    What I am saying is that short of a product recall anything that happens tomorrow will only be done to redirect / shape / focus the discussion around the iPhone 4. The problem for people wanting a recall is that the phone is still selling (and fast) and returns are presumably really low. Given that why would Apple want to change course? They are only concerned with making sure that it keeps selling without having to recall the product.

    We should however all be watching to see if Jobs brings an iPhone on to stage with him and if he does, which had he holds it in.

    [Updated: 7/15/10 at 1:18 PM]

    This is a really interesting bit posted by John Gruber:

    I was thinking the same thing yesterday, but I now have a hunch it’s going to be more — maybe a lot more — than just a defense of the iPhone 4 antenna. Sounds crazy, I know, but I think something big, or at least biggish, is going down tomorrow. This is not one of those “hunches” I get where I actually know something and play coy; I could be wrong and the thing could wind up just being 20 minutes of Steve Jobs telling us “not to hold it that way, or buy a case”. I’m betting on my hunch, though, and flying out late tonight.

    The fact that Gruber sees fit to fly across the country on short notice is telling. Yes it is his job to do so, but he certainly could have covered it from Philly – obviously given what he said in the above quote he thinks this is more than what I am thinking the press conference is.

  • iPhone 4 Meets The GripOfDeathInator

    Spencer Webb: But, hey, Consumer Reports guys: you don’t do radiated tests in a shield room. That’s like measuring the light output of a desk lamp in a house of mirrors. It’s amateur hour. Either you didn’t really explain your experimental technique fully in your video and text on your website, or perhaps you did…

    Spencer Webb:

    But, hey, Consumer Reports guys: you don’t do radiated tests in a shield room. That’s like measuring the light output of a desk lamp in a house of mirrors. It’s amateur hour. Either you didn’t really explain your experimental technique fully in your video and text on your website, or perhaps you did and it really stinks. In either case, we end up agreeing with each other, so let’s not dwell on that too much.

  • Consumer Reports Needs To Get It Together

    Michael Arrington: But suddenly Consumer Reports is crazy for the link bait. This iPhone 4 antenna problem has them going absolutely batshit crazy, and nearly every day they’re firing off a new set of recommendations, or demands, that conflict with the old recommendations and demands. Consumer Reports is an old crumbling piece of journalism –…

    Michael Arrington:

    But suddenly Consumer Reports is crazy for the link bait. This iPhone 4 antenna problem has them going absolutely batshit crazy, and nearly every day they’re firing off a new set of recommendations, or demands, that conflict with the old recommendations and demands.

    Consumer Reports is an old crumbling piece of journalism – the iPhone 4 does have problems, but you can’t rate it as the best smartphone ever and yet still not recommend it. They need to say it isn’t that great and don’t buy it, or it is that great and buy it with the antenna problems. Right now they are sitting in the middle and the middle helps no consumer that they report to.

  • How I Think The iPhone 4 Antenna Press Conference Is Going To Play Out

    MG Siegler: To combat that, Apple may feel the time is right to pull out their not-so-secret weapon: Steve Jobs. On a stage. Talking.

    MG Siegler:

    To combat that, Apple may feel the time is right to pull out their not-so-secret weapon: Steve Jobs. On a stage. Talking.

  • The Men Who Stare at Screens

    Gretchen Reynolds: Men who spent more than 23 hours a week watching TV and sitting in their cars (as passengers or as drivers) had a 64 percent greater chance of dying from heart disease than those who sat for 11 hours a week or less.

    Gretchen Reynolds:

    Men who spent more than 23 hours a week watching TV and sitting in their cars (as passengers or as drivers) had a 64 percent greater chance of dying from heart disease than those who sat for 11 hours a week or less.

  • How I outsourced my apartment hunt

    Chris Savage: Shahan ended up finding around 200 apartments that fit most of the criteria. He searched for two weeks totalling 30 hours of work. I spent about 10 minutes a day sorting and reviewing listings and ended up contacting about 7 listings. I found an apartment with the right price, location, and amenities after…

    Chris Savage:

    Shahan ended up finding around 200 apartments that fit most of the criteria. He searched for two weeks totalling 30 hours of work. I spent about 10 minutes a day sorting and reviewing listings and ended up contacting about 7 listings. I found an apartment with the right price, location, and amenities after only 4 different visits. I spent $90, saved about 30 hours of my time, and navigated the ugly craigslist sea unscathed. All in all, I was really happy with my first personal outsourcing test.

    I just have my Wife do it…but this sounds like a much cheaper way.

  • Email Mistakes That Irritate Smart People

    There are a lot of ways to send an email, and given that it is a tool that many of us spend a large chunk of our day using, I thought I would share some of the annoying things I come across when reading email. 1. Reply All This is one of those buttons that…

    There are a lot of ways to send an email, and given that it is a tool that many of us spend a large chunk of our day using, I thought I would share some of the annoying things I come across when reading email.

    1. Reply All

    This is one of those buttons that we like to hit so that everyone is kept in the ‘loop’, but the problem is not everyone needs to be kept in the loop — nor do they want to be. It is fine to hit reply all, but be sure to edit the list of people that you are replying to, keeping only those needed in the conversation in the email chain. If you are even in doubt about when to use reply all, don’t use it. Better to forward an email to someone later then to waste 50 people’s time reading email that they don’t care about.

    2. The “I CC’d You” Emails

    Let me tell you about the CC field, it is used to keep people in the loop that need to be kept in the loop. What it is not for is to be used as a way to show me that you are doing your job, or to ask me to do something. When I get an email that I have been CC’d in and somewhere in that message there is a task you want me to do — 90% of the time I miss that task. The reason is simple: I don’t read emails I am only CC’d in past the subject line. If you want me to respond or act on an email you send me, make sure I am in the ‘TO’ field.

    3. Look at a JPG of My Company Logo

    It is really awesome that you figured out how to embed your company logo in your email signature, but I know who you are and what your company logo looks like. I still hate it. Don’t waste bandwidth sending me email attachments of your logo. Further, it really screws me over when I go to look for emails that you sent me a file in as every email you send me has a damned attachment. Don’t even get me started about downloading that crap over AT&T’s sucktastic data service when I read your emails on my iPhone.

    4. Yes I Have Your Contact Info, Thanks

    Raise your hand if you just have one email signature that you use on all your emails — now drop your hand really fast on your head. We all have those fancy email signatures that include our contact info and maybe even a vCard ((insert OOooos and Ahhhhs here)), they definitely say our name and title. These are great for people who don’t know you, but when you are corresponding with other people in your office and regular contacts – your first name will suffice.

    Think of it like a phone call: if it is someone, who when you call, you need to introduce your full name and company to then use the big fancy email signature. However, if just saying your first name on that same call will do the trick, use that same etiquette for email. I have my email set to default to the signature: “`-Ben`”. If I need the other longer signature I can switch to it, otherwise the short and sweet one works best.

    5. Stop With the Cryptic Subject

    Think of your subject line like a title of a book — would you buy a book called “RE: Report”. Nope. We need to tell people what the email is about in the subject line, so that they know if they need to open it now or not. For instance instead of saying “Report” as your subject how about put the actual subject in – “Please Review My TPS Report” – oh snap now I know whether to read that now or later. ((probably later))

    6. Sending Large Files

    Most people I suspect never look at the file size that they are sending to people, they just know that if it bounces back they can’t send it as is. I would ask that if your email is over 3mb please send me a file link so that I can download it faster. There are a ton of services out there that do this, many that are so fast and easy you will be amazed. Sending and downloading large files over email is not what the protocols were designed for, and they are agonizingly slow – help yourself out and use a service like Droplr.

    7. Capitalization

    If you send me an email in all caps I will assume you are yelling at me and take my damn sweet time responding. Likewise if you send me an email in all lowercase I will assume that you couldn’t care less about the email you sent — resulting in me taking my damn sweet time responding. Typos and grammar problems abound, but we all know how to properly capitalize an email, so don’t be lazy.

    8. Keep It Short

    It is really great that you like details, but I don’t have time for them. Tell me what I need to know and what you need from me. Don’t waste my time asking about the weather or how business is going. Being concise in emails can often lead to people thinking that you don’t have the time for them – I am not talking about one line email responses (ala Steve Jobs), just say what you need to say in a clear and concise manner. This helps people better understand you and makes you look smart.

    9. Legal Notices and Printing Notices

    Drop the legal notice, it is just dumb amd makes you look paranoid. Drop the “be kind to the environment and don’t print this email” notices because it is just rude. You wouldn’t walk up to someone at Kinkos and ask them if they are sure they need those copies. If I need to print the email I will, otherwise assume it is filed away on my computer never to be revisited.

    10. Addressing People

    You don’t need to address me in the beginning of the email (e.g. ‘`Ben,`’ ) I know you are sending it to me because I received it – just get on with the email. The only exception to this is when you are sending it to multiple people in the “To:” field and you want to call certain peoples attention to different areas of the email (e.g. Ben: Can you please take care of the TPS report cover sheet issue. Janet: Please take a shower before coming to work.).

    11. The ‘Thanks’ Emails

    If I send you some information that you requested, there is no need to respond to me by saying just ‘Thanks’ it clutters up my inbox and is useless. I assume that, unless you keep asking me for information, you received it when I sent you, any problems and you will contact me. I sometimes write “no response necessary” at the bottom of my emails, but that just confuses most people. Just stop with unneeded emails and we will be good.

    12. Telling Me Versus Asking Me

    Unless you are my boss then you need to ask me for things, telling me to do something will get you no where. Don’t send me an email saying “I need you to get me this information ASAP” – ask me to get you that information and let me know if there is a time constraint. In doing this you will find people are far more helpful – even if you are their boss.

    13. The Follow-Up Call

    This is not strictly and email irritation, but I hate it when people call me to discuss an email chain, or in lieu of responding via email. If I sent you an email I did so for good reason – please respond in the format that I initiated the communication.

    14. Sent from my…

    Guess what no one cares where you sent your email from, and what device you are using. No one. It was cool for the first few weeks of iPhones, then Blackberry users started adding it and it naturally became lame. (( BlackBerry had this first but it said something like: “Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless” before the iPhone.)) Further I don’t get the thought process in having such a line attached to begin with – should I thank you for responding while you are not at the office? I am confused.