John Carey kicks off his guest desktop images with a fantastic shot. Carey’s Fiftyfootshadows has long been one of my absolute favorite sites for desktops.
It is now my mission to get featured with a guest desktop.
Anyways, be sure to check out [all desktops](http://fiftyfootshadows.net/category/desktops/) he has — every one is fantastic.
What Paul Thurrott failed to link to, but TUAW found, is this press release that details the ebook investigation surrounding iBooks:
>The European Commission has opened formal antitrust proceedings to investigate whether international publishers Hachette Livre (Lagardère Publishing, France), Harper Collins (News Corp., USA), Simon & Schuster (CBS Corp., USA), Penguin (Pearson Group, United Kingdom) and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holzbrinck (owner of inter alia Macmillan, Germany) have, possibly with the help of Apple, engaged in anti-competitive practices affecting the sale of e-books in the European Economic Area (EEA)1, in breach of EU antitrust rules.
This paints a much less “Apple is evil” sentiment than [Thurrott’s stupid post did](https://brooksreview.net/2011/12/dickhead/).
[Paul Thurrott pens a post](http://www.winsupersite.com/article/paul-thurrotts-wininfo/finally-apple-antitrust-probe-141507) this morning titled: “Finally, An Apple Antitrust Probe”. Always the source of fair and balanced reporting Thurrott takes this post one step further by not providing any links to back up his citations — except of course to other stories he has penned.
Thurrott starts by stating:
>Before Apple’s entry, publishers set the wholesale price of books, but retailers could determine the final selling price. But Apple changed that, allowing publishers for the first time to determine the final price at which eBooks were sold to consumers. As a result, the average selling price of new eBooks jumped from $9.99 to $14.99.
Those bastards at Apple didn’t want to set the prices themselves! How dare they!
In the very next sentence he states:
>The EC will try to determine if the firms colluded to fix prices and restrict competition. Both charges should be easily proven.
Oh now Thurrott is a European legal expert and knows all of the facts of the case. It’s a crying shame he writes a Windows site and not an Apple site — imagine all the insider knowledge he must possess to make such a claim. Further didn’t he just say it was the publishers that set the prices because Apple decided they didn’t want to?
Next Thurrott talks about how Amazon gave in to the publishers wanting to raise prices to match Apple — funny thing is he never says it was Apple that colluded with Amazon to raise the prices. Nope, just the publisher wanting higher pricing.
He cites further evidence from a class action suit filing in the U.S., quick note to my readers: unlike Thurrott you should be aware that filing a suit against someone in the U.S. does not — in fact — mean you are right by default.
>And now, finally, a major regulatory body is investigating this issue.
*Finally*. Hasn’t iBooks been out for like almost 1.5 years now, absurd!
Don’t take this as me saying that Apple is in the clear here. But what sounds more like Apple: what Thurrott is claiming and what he quotes EC spokesperson Amelia Torres as saying “had the objective or effect of restricting competition and fixing the price of e-books at a high level in Europe”; or does it make more sense that, perhaps, Apple just agreed to let the publishers set the price of their own goods in the store (as Thurrott claimed in his own post).
There is likely to be somethings that went wrong here, but I think it is idiotic of Thurrott to make the blanket claim that this will be “easily proven”.
So glad I am not on Facebook. Also here are [Mark Zuckerberg’s private photos](http://imgur.com/a/PrLrB).
Update: I am hearing this has now been patched.
Worth it to snag a copy of Fantastical, BusyCal and LaunchBar if you don’t have those already.
Apple Insider’s Daniel Eran Dilger reports on carrier speeds:
>Bottom line: AT&T is already fastest in general, significantly faster on average, and has far more room to grow in progressively rolling out even faster speeds to existing iPhone users over the next couple years.
He topped out at 5.4Mbps on the downlink. The fastest I have observed on my AT&T 4S is 6.38Mbps down. The data collected largely shows what should already be “known” given the network technologies at play.
Dan Pallotta on the absurd nature of our world:
>There was a huge sign in the lobby that said, “Our goal is to exceed the customer’s expectation.” The best way to start would be to take down that bullshit sign that just reminds me, as a customer, how cosmic the gap is between what businesses say and what they do. My expectation is not to have signs around that tell me you want to exceed my expectations.
Dan Goodwin:
>Computer scientists have discovered a weakness in smartphones running Google’s Android operating system that allows attackers to secretly record phone conversations, monitor geographic location data, and access other sensitive resources without permission.
Yikes.
Samantha Murphy:
>Olympus has been under fire since its CEO Michael Woodford was terminated about two months ago — just weeks after he joined the global camera maker — for publicly voicing his concerns about the company’s allegedly shady business acquisitions.
Murphy notes the “covered up” losses date back 20 years. Yikes.
Dan Seitz writing for Guyism.com about the tablets you should avoid this holiday shopping season:
>The Apple iPad 2: Why are we recommending you not bother with this one? Because the iPad 3 is inevitable next year, and there might even be two of them. It’s not worth $500 for a device that will be obsolete in three to five months.
Stupid advice. Even if a new iPad came out in January the iPad 2 is still a great buy and will be useable for at least the next 2-3 years. The iPad 2 is the *only* tablet you should be buying.
I noticed that the Fire gets worse WiFi reception that just about any other device I have owned since 2008. It get’s one bar shy of full when placed about 10 feet from my router.
This issue, however, is something that I have not experienced.
Brent Simmons illustrates what’s wrong with publishers today by sharing a story of a publication being willing to delay the app launch in order to accommodate the display of an animated splash screen. Amazing.
When the Jawbone UP was announced my buddy Shawn Blanc was pretty excited about it and subsequently he got me pretty excited as well. Shawn ordered one and found that he liked it and so I set out to get one. After not finding one and being skeptical about keeping something on my wrist — additionally being concerned about its accuracy — I decided to skip the UP and order a Fitbit instead.
[
](https://f3a98a5aca88d28ed629-2f664c0697d743fb9a738111ab4002bd.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/fitbit-1.jpg)
The Fitbit looks like an oversized paperclip and is far less useful to clip onto things than a paperclip. The Fitbit is easy to clip onto the included wristband, or a thin shirt. A belt or pants pocket will require the use of the included belt clip. The stupidity of this entire situation does not elude me.
[
](https://f3a98a5aca88d28ed629-2f664c0697d743fb9a738111ab4002bd.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/fitbit-3.jpg)
Fitbit is a product that has a built in clip, but also includes a belt clip holster due to the failings of the built in clip. This makes my head hurt.
[
](https://f3a98a5aca88d28ed629-2f664c0697d743fb9a738111ab4002bd.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/fitbit-4.jpg)
### Tracking
The Fitbit tracks a slew of things, but here’s what I track with it:
– Steps taken each day.
– Sleep “efficiency”.
It’s a glorified pedometer that has been hacked and programmed to tell you all sorts of data.
[
](https://f3a98a5aca88d28ed629-2f664c0697d743fb9a738111ab4002bd.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/fitbit-2.jpg)
In my unscientific tests I found the Fitbit to track my steps fairly accurately when kept in my front pocket. It records just a few extra steps for every 100 steps in my testing. That’s not too shabby given that I likely am the cause of the mis-counts (arm hitting my pocket or grabbing something out of my pocket).
The sleep tracking is what I was very excited for. Then I found out that you must purchase that at a $49 a year price tag. I did. Now I know how many times I was “awoken”, how fast I fell asleep, and how long I slept for. Yay?
### The Idea
The overall Fitbit product is well done (with the exception of the clip fiasco), but the execution for this type of product is significantly flawed.
The UP comes closer to moving the execution forward by providing the user with active feedback through the use of vibration alerts, but still (I believe) largely fails to push change of any sort. People just don’t want to wear the UP on their wrists all the time, which is the fatal flaw of that product.
The Fitbit is a completely passive device. It syncs with your computer only through a special cable. It doesn’t show you and give you very useful feedback on the device. The software leaves it to the user to decide what they want to get out of the data.
When I started using the Fitbit I was sleeping for six and a half hours on an average night — far too little sleep. Yet the Fitbit never said: “hey it is recommend that you get at least 30 minutes additional sleep”.
That is a simple thing to say and has been beaten into our heads for most of our lives, yet the Fitbit couldn’t care less. I changed my sleeping habit to 7 hours a night, but not because the Fitbit told me to — I just didn’t realize how little I was sleeping. That’s the difference between a useful device and a passive tool. The Fitbit is certainly in the latter category.
In fact that sleep change of 30 minutes is the only thing the Fitbit has changed about my life.
In no way is my life better because I have a Fitbit. In no way am I more active. In no way am I in better shape or likewise more healthy. At no point did the Fitbit actively try to help me with any of those above listed items.
The failure of the Fitbit is not in the product, but the idea that a little piece of plastic can actually help you — because it can’t. At least it can’t help you until you make it aware of the goal.
Giving the Fitbit a goal of 5,000 steps a day is useless. It’s useless because it does’t count that I walk up and down 12 flights of stairs everyday. Useless because it doesn’t know when I am carrying additional weight while walking (unloading groceries, carrying a computer bag, etc.). The amount of steps I take each day in no way correlates with how active I was.
In the end these types of devices are utterly useless because they are tracking the wrong things. We don’t need our steps tracked, or for a device to guess at our ‘activity’ level, or looks at our sleeping habits. We need to be told what we are doing wrong and how we can change it.
That’s going to help.
And that’s not what the Fitbit, UP, et al does. Save your money, because these activity tracking devices are about as good as the Palm Treo was when all we were looking for is an iPhone.
**UPDATE** (on Dec 6, 2011): This post doesn’t make it clear that you can track your sleep without the add on purchase, but you don’t get the full benefit of the system unless you pay. Sorry for the confusion.
**UPDATE** (on Dec 7, 2011): I have added my expanded thoughts on this type of device. [You can find that post here](https://brooksreview.net/2011/12/pam/).
You have got to be kidding me. Andy Greenberg notes:
>But EPIC’s Rotenberg says that the scans, like those in the airport, potentially violate the fourth amendment. “Without a warrant, the government doesn’t have a right to peer beneath your clothes without probable cause,” he says. Even airport scans are typically used only as a secondary security measure, he points out. “If the scans can only be used in exceptional cases in airports, the idea that they can be used routinely on city streets is a very hard argument to make.”
Frank Chimero:
>I’m skeptical of rote simplicity. It’s good for the people making digital tools to simplify their job and make one tiny widget, but a swarm of tools that all do one tiny thing well is still a complex system for the user to manage.
The “one thing well” idea is great, but only for a small subset of tasks. The Google Chromebook (supposedly) does one thing well: runs the web. Yet not many people want that experience.
It’s one thing to make small apps for my iPhone that each do a particular task really well — while being a completely different thing to make an iPhone that only does one thing well. The simplicity in the iPhone is that every thing it does out of the box it does very well — without requiring extra things.
It can be quite tiring to check 45 different apps.
A petition over at WhiteHouse.gov to:
>Allow devices that have “Airplane Mode” to be used during taxi, takeoff, and landing through revising FAA regulation.
Josh Williams makes it official on the Gowalla blog today:
>Gowalla, as a service, will be winding down at the end of January. We plan to provide an easy way to export your Passport data, your Stamp and Pin data (along with your legacy Item data), and your photos as well. Facebook is not acquiring Gowalla’s user data.
Gowalla in its original state was far superior to Foursquare. With recent updates it failed to be useful for me, but it is still sad to see it go.
Michael Lopp wrote about moving from a messenger bag to a backpack. This is a fantastic look at the thought behind choosing a great bag. I love Tom Bihn’s products and the [Ristretto that I use](https://brooksreview.net/2011/02/new-bag/), but I think I am going to give a backpack a try after reading this.
The primary problems with the Ristretto are:
1. It doesn’t scale well.
2. Nothing in it every feels truly secure. (I have watched things slide out of it during take-off.)
Here’s to backpacks? We’ll see.
You have goals — use OmniFocus to reconstruct fragments of ideas or projects into actionable steps to complete those goals.
Move the responsibility of remembering daily tasks from your brain to OmniFocus — gather everything into the Inbox for later review, and then organize those bits into folders, projects, actions, and contexts.
OmniFocus is as simple or advanced as you decide to make it, and available on Mac, iPad, and iPhone with free cloud sync. Move past mere task management and get things done with precision.
Read more about OmniFocus [here](http://click.syndicateads.net/2011/11/Omni-1/brooksreview.html).
### Editor’s Comment ###
That’s what the OmniGroup has to say about OmniFocus. If you search this site for “OmniFocus” you will get [237 results](http://www.google.com/search?q=OmniFocus&site=brooksreview.net&domains=brooksreview.net&sitesearch=brooksreview.net). That’s quite a bit. [Here is my longstanding thought about OmniFocus](OmniFocus):
“As of right now there is no doubt in my mind that it is worth twice as much money.”
There are a lot of things on my Mac that I could use to replace other apps and I would get by just fine. But OmniFocus is completely irreplaceable to me.