Category: Articles

  • ‘Designing Blogs for Readers’

    [Matt Gemmell on how to not design your blog like a douchebag, I mean, well no, that’s actually what I mean][1]:

    > The design should serve the text. Text should never be made to conform to a design for any purpose other than legibility, on a personal blog.

    I almost entirely agree with Matt and on the matters that I don’t agree with him, my disagreements are more matters of personal taste than anything else. (Even in those instances Matt likely knows more than I do.)

    I’ve talked a bit about [well-designed sites for readers][2], but I think the above quote is really the essence of blogging: it’s about the content. Whenever I see a bunch of clutter on a website design I jump to one of (or both of) these conclusions:

    1. This “guy” is desperate for attention.
    2. This “guy” is desperate for money.

    Probably not the conclusion you want me drawing when I, or anyone else, comes to your site.

    I’ve made some tweaks to this site over the past 6 months to try and boost membership in subtle ways. The most annoying of those moves is to put nagging text in the footer of the free RSS feed. Other instances are the subtle way that I word the date strings (“Originally posted for members on…”), and at the bottom of posts as a reminder that you *can* subscribe.

    For the most part I am uncomfortable with those elements being present and would love to remove them (in an ideal world), but they serve an important purpose that I can’t find a better way around: selling memberships. (Funny enough, when I remove those aspects I usually get a lot of emails from *current members* complaining that I am not doing enough to promote my site.) ((Also, be sure to check out the swell ad on RocketINK.net this month.))

    At the end of the day there will always be things about your site that you do because you kind of have to. I don’t think many people that have ads on their sites (single authors at least) love the fact that they have ads, but for many it has almost become a necessity as there is no better way to get paid for writing.

    All this to say: make the site something you are proud of, and only use articles like Matt’s as a guide, not as gospel.

    [1]: http://mattgemmell.com/2013/05/22/designing-blogs-for-readers/
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2012/11/readable/

  • Keyboard Maestro 6

    People, today we have [Keyboard Maestro 6]() and oh baby is it awesome. A few new features that are killer:

    – Safari Actions to grab the URL and Title. I had a ton of actions that grabbed this data by using a slew of different methods, but I just went through and changed them to the new actions to speed up the flow.
    – There’s a new trigger that is based off of your wireless network. This is amazing. I have an entire set of macros that I want to run when I get to the office and when I get home from the office. Previously the only way I triggered these was by time, but that doesn’t work when I leave early or stay at work late. Now I can just trigger macros when I actually get to the office which is amazing.
    – The ability to write your own action was added too, and I’d love to see app developers take advantage of this by adding custom actions for their apps in Keyboard Maestro. *I’m looking at you OmniFocus.*

    There’s also a new icon (about time right?) and it looks fantastic.

    One more nerdy addition: `%|%`. Using that text token you can set where your cursor will be after an action is run. Why is this cool? Well I use Keyboard Maestro to create Markdown and HTML links all the time and this will allow me to have a macro that formats everything so I can type in the linked text last without having to touch the mouse — a really nice addition that will keep me in the writing mode instead of forcing me to move my hand to the trackpad.

    Keyboard Maestro 6 is $36, or $18 for an upgrade (until 7/31) — it’s a must buy in my book.

  • Congress Sends a Letter

    I totally missed this, but the Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus [sent a letter to Google CEO Larry Page][1], posing eight specific questions about their privacy concerns with Google Glass(es). I doubt Google will answer these truthfully, so let me go ahead and do that *for* them.

    > In 2010, it was discovered that Google was collecting information across the globe from unencrypted wireless networks. This practice caused multiple investigations into the company along with consumers left perplexed. Google just recently agreed to pay $7 million to settle charges with 38 states for the collection of data from unprotected Wi-Fi networks without permission. Google also admitted that they did not adequately protect the privacy of consumers and “tightened up” their systems to address the issue. While we are thankful that Google acknowledged that there was an issue and took responsible measures to address it, we would like to know how Google plans to prevent Google Glass from unintentionally collecting data about the user/non-user without consent?

    “First I would like to start by thanking Congress for their keen interest in our exciting Google Glass project — it really will change the world (Or an island. You guys catch my keynote?). As for Glass unintentionally collecting data, I can assure you that Google Glass will indeed only *intentionally* collect data. This collection is not limited and therefore is all encompassing and should help us better tell you what you actually want to do. All users and non-users have consented to Google Glass’ collection of data by simply searching on Google.com.”

    > What proactive steps is Google taking to protect the privacy of non-users when Google Glass is in use? Are product lifecycle guidelines and frameworks, such as Privacy By Design, being implemented in connection with its product design and commercialization? For example. if a Google Glass customer/user decides to resell or to dispose of their Google Glass product. Would there be any product capabilities incorporated into the device to ensure that one’s personal information remains private and secure?

    “We are leaving it up to the user to make sure that they are not using Glass in a way that negatively effects non-users. Further, we see this as an issue for Congress itself to address with lawmaking. All Google Glass devices are protected with a retina scan of the users eye — the data of which is stored on Google servers — and no data will be accessible to another user without first allowing us to collect their retina scan.”

    > When using Google Glass, is it true that this product would be able to use Facial Recognition Technology to unveil personal information about whomever and even some inanimate objects that the user is viewing? Would a user be able to request such information? Can a non-user or human subject opt out of this collection of personal data? If so, how? If not, why not?

    “Using the vast database that Google has amassed about our users we will apply an algorithm to determine if that user actually wants us to share their personal information. So, yes to Facial Recognition, and a big ‘Hell No’ to opting out. Do you have any idea how many requests we would get if we let people opt out?”

    > In Google’s privacy policy, it states that the company “may reject requests that are unreasonably repetitive, require disproportionate technical effort… risk the privacy of others, or would be extremely impractical” Please provide examples of when Google would reject requests on Google Glass that would risk the privacy of others? Would Google place limits on the technology and what type of information it can reveal about another person? If so, please explain. If not, why not?

    “Look for our privacy policy to be updated… While Google will not be limiting the technology, for the greater good, Google would certainly hold back Social Security Numbers for individuals — that kind of privacy invasion is just creepy.”

    > Given Google Glass’s sensory and processing capabilities, has Google considered making any additions or refinements to its privacy policy’? If so, please explain. If not, why not?

    “We absolutely will be tweaking our privacy policy to adapt it to the ever changing needs of Google. Starting July 4th, 2013 we will be editing the privacy policy of Google to simply reflect our motto: ‘Don’t be evil’. This will make Google’s privacy policy the shortest of any tech company and the most open.”

    > In Google’s privacy policy, it states that the company “may collect device-specific information (such as your hardware model, operating system version, unique device identifiers, and mobile network information including phone number).”
    a. Would this information be collected from users operating Google Glass? If so, what specific information is Google intending to collect’?
    b. Would Google Glass collect any data about the user without the user’s knowledge and consent? If so, why? If not, please explain.

    “A. Google is intending to collect all information input to, located around, seen by, heard by, touched by, or thought by Google Glass users and those within 30 feet of Google Glass Users. B. We will be clearly popping up a dialog that the user will see when they don Google Glass explaining what will be collected. Should the user not want to consent, they must simply click the ‘No’ button with their mouse, otherwise the message disappears in 3 seconds and thus the user will have consented. This we believe is the best experience for Google, I mean the user.”

    > It was recently revealed that the New York Times was the first to release an app for Google Glass. To what extent was privacy considered in approving this app? Is Google planning to make privacy a priority for future app developers? If not, why not? If so, please explain.

    “Our engineers, the smartest in the world, scrutinized the app to make sure that it did not compromise the privacy of Google in any way. Thank you for your concern, and I can assure you we will do our very best to protect the privacy of Google’s algorithms.”

    > Will Google Glass have the capacity to store any data on the device itself? If so, will Google Glass implement some sort of user authentication system to safeguard stored data? If not, why not? If so, please explain.

    “All data will be stored in the cloud so that Google can better sift through the it and help pull out the relevant bits while tossing aside things the user need not concern themselves with. For example, we have determined that emails from the ‘Brooksreview.net’ domain are superfluous to all recipients, while Viagra related emails clearly need priority.”

    “In closing I would like to thank each of you personally for your letter:

    – Mr. Barton: Thank you, FYI your dinner will be ready 10 minutes late today because your wife just Google’d ‘how to make burnt food taste better’.
    – Mr. Rush: URGENT: Do not eat at that diner again, the waiter is upset you only tipped 5% and Google’d ‘How to hide spit in food’.
    – Mr. Nugent: I can see you.
    – Mr. Chabot: It’s 78° outside and a comfortable 72° in your office, yet you insist on flannel underwear, please explain — just speak to the east wall in your office.
    – Mr. Barrow: I would like to thank you for using Google to research the article citations in this letter. It made it much easier for us to know what would be said.
    – Mr. Jones: In 1972 you said that you traveled to Borneo, however given your recent search history we now know where you really were. Call me.
    – Mr. Johnson: Dad *is* proud, right this moment.
    – Mrs. Sanchez: *Hi.*”

    There you are Mr. Page, I saved you some time.

    [1]: http://joebarton.house.gov/images/GoogleGlassLtr_051613.pdf

  • ‘Tumblr. + Yahoo! = !!’

    [Over the weekend Yahoo! acquired Tumblr.][1] (What the fuck do I do here, place a double period? *Jesus*, these names.). I didn’t think I had much to say on it, then Yahoo! went and Yahooed ((Should “yahooed” have an exclamation point? This shit is so confusing.)) it up.

    In the announcement, CEO of Yahoo! Marissa Mayer (whom I like) says:

    > We promise not to screw it up.

    That’s the second fucking sentence and it’s a catastrophe. At no point should you state such a weak saying at the top of your press release. You are the new CEO of Yahoo, perhaps if you had previously screwed up other web companies you bought this might be warranted, but in this case it just looks pathetic.

    I didn’t read past that line, because who cares.

    Instead let’s look to the reaction of others:

    [Adam Lisagor][2]:

    > Marissa Mayer uses two spaces between sentences.

    *Cringe.*

    [Jim Ray][3]:

    > (whispers) i like this yahoo tumblr thing

    That’s about the reaction I had when news started coming out Saturday/Friday. I thought it was smart on Mayer’s part and smart on Tumblr.’s part.

    The problem here is not that Yahoo ((I’m done with the stupid punctuation.)) bought Tumblr, the problem isn’t that Yahoo promised not to screw it up, or that two spaces were used. No the problem is that Yahoo already screwed it up. How?

    [Neven Mrgan][4]:

    > SnarkAttack! The fact that Yahoo announced their acquisition of Tumblr using that tired “keep calm and carry on” image reflects well their strategy of buying the cool kids of three years ago.

    Not to mention that the image they used is an animated gif and should carry an epileptic seizure warning on it — the entire gif is reminiscent of Geocities. And while I wouldn’t read too much into [the WordPress import numbers][5], it is still telling that people are leery of Tumblr’s future.

    But most importantly, what the hell *does* Yahoo do with [all the porn?][6]

    Because it’s a catch 22 for Yahoo. They just promised not to screw Tumblr up, so does that mean porn stays? If it doesn’t stay, isn’t that “screwing it up”?

    [1]: http://yahoo.tumblr.com/post/50902111638/tumblr-yahoo
    [2]: https://alpha.app.net/sandwich/post/5861157
    [3]: https://alpha.app.net/jimray/post/5859046
    [4]: https://alpha.app.net/mrgan/post/5858246
    [5]: http://ma.tt/2013/05/yahooblr/%23comments
    [6]: http://mobile.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-17/if-yahoo-buys-tumblr-what-will-it-do-with-all-that-porn

  • ‘Spelling Alphabet’

    I’ve mentioned before how insanely useful it is to know something like the [NATO Alphabet][1] (where people say “Alpha Bravo Charlie” instead of ABC). Sometimes you forget a letter, or are just too slow to feel comfortable saying it, well fear no more [there’s now an app for that][2].

    No clue how useful this will be to people, but I downloaded it.

    [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_phonetic_alphabet
    [2]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/spelling-alphabet/id499351638?mt=12

  • ‘Welcome to Google Island’

    [Mat Honan, for Wired, on what Google’s Island “is”](http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2013/05/on-google-island/):

    > I was thirsty, so I drank the electrolyte solution down. “This is delicious,” I replied.

    > “I know,” he {Larry Page} replied. “It also has thousands of micro sensors which are now swarming through your blood stream.”

    > “What… ” I stammered.

    > “Your prostate is enlarged. Let’s go hangout now. There’s some really great music I’d like to recommend to you.”

    It’s everything I feared it would be…

  • 22 Workplace Tips We Learned From The Office

    [Kevin Fallon][1] has the list:

    > **Know how to motivate.**
    > Robert: There’s something about an underdog that really inspires the unexceptional.

    I love that show. [Hands down this was the best episode][2] — I did that prank at my office and it might be the funniest thing I have ever seen.

    [1]: http://m.theweek.com/article.php?id=244301
    [2]: http://officepranks.blogspot.com/2007/02/fun-with-andys-phone.html

  • ‘Going Native’

    [James Martin slamming the always changing world of web apps][1]:

    > Why are web apps worse than native apps? Because they encourage you, big-shot startup entrepreneur, to experiment on me instead of thinking through the job that I’ve hired your software to do.

    For the most part I really cannot stand to use non-native applications. If there is a native app — and it is even reasonably decent, yeah I’m using it. Just about the only web app that I use everyday is Fever, and that hasn’t changed its look since it was launched (as far as I know).

    Martin’s article got me to thinking about iCloud and how Apple approaches changes to web apps: very slowly. Bugs are, and should be, fixed and pushed as fast as possible. But new features, design changes, these types of things are typically brought all in one fell swoop with Apple. There’s a good reason for that: Apple likes to let testers be the testers and users, well, use working software.

    *(Side note: I love Martin’s last sentence, so perfect.)*

    [1]: http://jamesmart.in/notes/2013/05/16/going-native.html

  • Some ‘New’ Weather Apps

    Marco [reminded][1] me that I’ve been sitting on a few weather apps that I tried recently. Let’s get started.

    ## Haze

    [Haze][2] believes that a subtly animated background image behind the temperature makes for a better iOS weather app. I assume.

    There’s no doubt that Haze is a pretty looking app, but what void does it fill? The data is mostly buried, requiring far more tapping and swiping than Apple’s weather app.

    Haze’s differentiator is to display the total hours of sunshine today, which is problematic for two reasons:

    1. I live in Western Washington where the sun don’t shine.
    2. Even if the sun did shine, what good does the amount of sunshine do for me? Yay, 9 hours of sunshine…?

    ## Yahoo! Purple Icon Weather

    The day Yahoo! launched [their weather app][3] I received a ton questions from readers asking for my take on it. I resisted downloading the app solely to boycott the hideous icon. I finally downloaded Yahoo! Weather and am underwhelmed.

    Contextual background images from Flickr aside, I really don’t like the way data is displayed in this app.

    The hourly forecast is too small to see at a glance. The week forecast is decent, but not unique. The font size on the ‘details’ screen is too small. The map is hideous. I do like the precipitation chart, but — uh — Dark Sky.

    Hey, cute, windmills! …?

    To be perfectly honest I just don’t understand the Sun and Moon portion. Why do I need to see a visualization of the Sun’s position again?

    At least the app is free of ads and free to install…

    ## Allergies

    Allergies is a [simple “weather-ish” app][4] that shows pollen count (I assume) and the type of allergen in the air. It also displays the pollen count for the next few days.

    The app also shows the current weather conditions to fill space, I assume. Why would you want this? Because you have allergies.

    The app looks really nice, but the data it presents would be far better served inside another weather app so you don’t have to check something else.

    ## ZYRTEC® ALLERGYCAST™

    This [App™][5] is® similar to Allergies with two notable exceptions:

    1. It’s very ugly.
    2. It’s potentially very useful.

    Let’s just get this out of the way upfront: there isn’t a single good looking aspect of this app. However, ZYRTEC® ALLERGYCAST™ lets you record your symptoms for the day — in an attempt to help you figure what you’re actually reacting to. Logging is very fast and easy to do: Simply indicate how you’re feeling and what your symptoms are. Over time this app might help you get a better idea of the pollens you should avoid.

    It’s free, and probably worth trying if you have mild allergies.

    [1]: http://www.marco.org/2013/05/10/tire-kickers
    [2]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/haze/id594476963?mt=8
    [3]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/yahoo!-weather/id628677149?mt=8
    [4]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/allergies/id568425029?mt=8
    [5]: https://itunes.apple.com/app/zyrtec-allergycast/id320298020?mt=8

  • ‘Evil Eric Schmidt’

    Google Executive Chairman Eric “Uncle Creepy” Schmidt [made an appearance on an NPR show][1], and oh boy…

    On the idea of Google’s slogan (“Don’t be evil”) he had this to say:

    > SCHMIDT: Well, it was invented by Larry and Sergey. And the idea was that we don’t quite know what evil is, but if we have a rule that says don’t be evil, then employees can say, I think that’s evil. Now, when I showed up, I thought this was the stupidest rule ever, because there’s no book about evil except maybe, you know, the Bible or something.

    There is so much gold here. ” Woah, woah, woah, that ain’t my rule. I don’t know what evil really is. I think they made the rule as an easy way for anyone to veto something we are doing. Either way it is a dumb rule because the only way to know what is evil is to read the Bible and given that I don’t know what evil is — you can guess I’ve never read *that* book.”

    Now, Schmidt, went on about “evil”:

    > So what happens is, I’m sitting in this meeting, and we’re having this debate about an advertising product. And one of the engineers pounds his fists on the table and says, that’s evil. And then the whole conversation stops, everyone goes into conniptions, and eventually we stopped the project. So it did work.

    This is good, I suppose, that Google was able to control itself — but how’d they actually shut it down if Schmidt doesn’t even know what evil is? My guess: Schmidt doesn’t like how arbitrary the definition of evil truly is.

    So Google was willing to kill an advertising product by citing the “evil rule”, but build in access to Gmail which would allow ERIC FREAKING SCHMIDT to read your email if he wanted? *Sure*…

    > SAGAL: Mountain View. And they’ve got this screen up that shows, like, Google searches right now, things that people are typing into the search engine, so you know. If you wanted to, could you just flip a switch on your office computer and just, like, read my emails just for the hell of it?

    > SCHMIDT: Yes, and I would lose my job, be fired, and be sued to death.

    I’m not foolish enough to have assumed Google *didn’t* have access to my email, but it seems absurd that *one* person in the company could just access it like nothing — which is exactly what is being implied here. The idea that it’s this easy is just nuts.

    And yes, [Apple has suspicious shit going on in the privacy area too][2], but how the hell should anyone feel comfortable using Gmail if any top-executive can just pull up their email on a laptop?

    [1]: http://www.npr.org/2013/05/11/182873683/google-chairman-eric-schmidt-plays-not-my-job
    [2]: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/05/14/iphone-encryption

  • ‘Due.app and Reminder Notifications’

    [Just Blanton on why he loves the repeating notifications in Due.app][1]:

    > As you can imagine, this is great for (recurring) tasks that don’t necessarily need to be completed by/at the specified time, but instead can be done within some hours-wide window; e.g., a daily workout routine, weekly status updates you send to your manager, a reminder to call a friend on Saturday (set it for 9AM and have it bug you every hour until you do it), etc.

    I actually didn’t know Due.app had a notification that would *keep* bugging you… Is that new? Anyways it sounds fantastic, and it would be great if all to-do apps had this functionality.

    [1]: http://hypertext.net/2013/05/due-app-reminders/

  • Someone Should Write a Mail.app Plugin

    When I first [saw a post][1] about hacking *The Onion*, I didn’t think much of it. But when I saw [David Sparks post about it][2] I immediately thought: this is a software problem that should be fixable.

    My first thought was to jump into Keyboard Maestro and create a macro that would show you the link you clicked on before anything actually opens the link.

    But I couldn’t figure that out…

    Then I thought — Applescript? Maybe, but I don’t know how to do that.

    Next I thought about a whole system implementation where we create an App in Automator that is set as the default browser, shows you URLs clicked on, and opens the URL if you want. Not only could I not figure this out, but holy shit that sounds like a horrid solution.

    So my thought now is rather simple: someone should write a plugin for Mail.app that is a link checker. All it does is shows you a dialog when you click on the link — this dialog exposes the full URL. If you want to open it, hit return, or a button — otherwise you don’t have to open it.

    (Also this plugin should fix the flaw in Mail.app whereby Mail will not open links in the background.)

    Anyways, if someone wants to build that I would be glad to test it — if it works I’ll promote it (hell everyone should).

    [1]: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/05/13/syrians-the-onion
    [2]: http://macsparky.com/blog/hackingonion

  • Naked WordPress

    [This is a really fantastic tool for learning how to read and use WordPress themes][1]. The code is heavily commented and easily explains what does what.

    `// This fxn allows plugins, and WordPress itself, to insert themselves/scripts/css/files
    // (right here) into the head of your website.
    // Removing this fxn call will disable all kinds of plugins and WordPress default insertions.
    // Move it if you like, but I would keep it around.
    ?\>

    Great tool.

    [1]: http://bckmn.com/naked-wordpress/

  • ‘Elegy for the Text Box’

    [Paul Ford gets to the bottom of why I don’t like CMSs that have no difference between editing and published][1]:

    > Not only do web pages need to look good for readers, but since any bit of code is now a potential document, they need to work for writers and editors too. I was recently using a website built along these lines—a blogging platform where there’s no difference between the composing view and the published view—and while it was a beautiful experience, I missed the ability to switch from the homely text box to the official “published” view. The beauty was confusing; every paragraph felt permanent as I wrote it.

    I think that sense of permanency is what really bugs me.

    This is a great post so be sure to read it — especially if you work in design or development.

    [1]: http://www.printmag.com/featured/paul-fords-interaction-elegy-for-the-text-box/

  • Amazon Coins

    Today, Amazon announced the launch of [Amazon Coins][1], a new Amazon-specific “currency” for buying apps, games, music, and other items from Amazon.

    I’ve never been interested in schemes like this, for a number of reasons. First, why should I give money to a company for them to invest when I could be making even the smallest amount of interest in a chequing account. Second, there’s no guarantee the company I have purchased this type of currency from will continue to accept it indefinitely. And third, what happens when I’ve got $100 in Amazon coins and am a few bucks short from paying my rent?

    I don’t see any value for consumers in a system like this. As [Garrett Murray][2] put it:

    We already have money, it’s called money.

    [1]: http://www.amazon.com/coins
    [2]: http://log.maniacalrage.net/post/50374973629/amazon-coins-a-terrible-idea-for-consumers

  • ‘Reflections on Google Glass’

    I have, thus far, managed to avoid reading any review about Google Glass — mostly because I think the product is *fucking horrible* on many levels. But, for what ever reason, this article by [Jan Chipchase was in my queue][1]. In the article Chipcase poses this interesting thought (then he digressed and I stopped reading), but he says (in the beginning):

    > As a product that is both on-your-face and in-your-face, Glass is set to become a lightning rod for a wider discussion around what constitutes acceptable behavior in public and private spaces. The Glass debate has already started, but these are early days; each new iteration of hardware and functionality will trigger fresh convulsions. In the short term, Glass will trigger anger, name-calling, ridicule and the occasional bucket of thrown water (whether it’s ice water, I don’t know). In the medium term, as societal interaction with the product broadens, signs will appear in public spaces guiding mis/use1 and lawsuits will fly, while over the longer term, legislation will create boundaries that reflect some form of im/balance between individual, corporate and societal wants, needs and concerns.

    Debate? We need to debate this? Give me a fucking break, there is *no* debate. Here’s how you know when Glass is inappropriate: anywhere you would not feel comfortable whipping out an SLR to take a photo without permission, is a place where Glass is inappropriate.

    Yeah, I see you, guy in the corner trying to take a sneaky picture of the hot girl at the bar with your iPhone — put that shit away. Oh you are so clever pretending to take a picture of your friend, but really taking a picture of that hick wearing the ironic t-shirt. In both situations you don’t want to get caught, because you know what you are doing is socially not acceptable — maybe illegal.

    With Glass, Google gives stealth photo ability to any [idiot][2] with $1,500 to burn.

    The only debate to be had is if we wait for the product to flop, or make it illegal right now. My vote: pass a law that would force Google to have a red LED on the damned things when the camera is active — I mean you already look like a douche wearing them. ((If you like Google Glass, please stop reading my site.))

    [1]: http://allthingsd.com/20130412/you-lookin-at-me-reflections-on-google-glass/
    [2]: http://www.siliconrepublic.com/new-media/item/32540-robert-scoble-wears-google/

  • The Missouri Drone Journalism Program

    The other day, on App.net, [I wondered][1]:

    > How long before news stations switch from helicopters to those little quadracopter drone things.

    My thought was that [quadrocopters][2] seemed more able to get into areas discretely, cheaper to operate, and well easier to deploy quickly. They seem to make a ton of sense in journalism — though I certainly don’t like the idea of this from a privacy standpoint.

    Well it turns out (tip of the hat to [Gil][3]) there is a [Missouri Drone Journalism Program][4] here’s how the program describes itself:

    > Drones tend to have a negative connotation in today’s media. The public mostly hears the word drone when associated with war and destruction. However, drone technology can be used in many other aspects, including field reporting. Part of this project’s goal is to discover how best to utilize this technology in the field of journalism.

    I may not like the idea, but WHERE WAS THIS CLASS WHEN I WAS IN SCHOOL?

    [1]: https://alpha.app.net/benbrooks/post/5572554
    [2]: http://www.quadrocopter.com
    [3]: https://alpha.app.net/benbrooks/post/5572554
    [4]: http://www.missouridronejournalism.com

  • App Pricing

    [Marco Arment, writing about app pricing and free trials,][1] argues that simply pricing apps higher would have a net negative effect on the ecosystem:

    > This apps-as-entertainment market falls apart if app pricing rises above casual-disposable levels for most people. Few people balk at spending $1-3 for something that doesn’t end up being that great, but when someone’s $30 app is disappointing, that’s going to stick with them and inhibit future purchases.

    I concur, but I also think there’s room for more expensive apps. What’s interesting about the App Store is the relative lack of pricing ranges in the store: Weather apps are free, tip calculators are free, to-do list apps are generally `$4.99` (with a couple premium offerings), games are free with in-app `$0.99` one-off purchases.

    All of these price points are rather arbitrary, and were typically set by the first app to get popularity in each category. If the best and most popular weather app is free, you’ll be hard pressed to charge for yours — and so on.

    Instead of every developer just raising prices, it would be nice to see more developers work like the task management market. Good apps exist for free, and [excellent apps][2] are available for `$19.99` or more. This maintains the harmony of ‘almost zero-risk purchasing’ in tact, yet allows for “power” users to pay a premium for apps that are truly worth a premium.

    The reason I don’t bitch about task management apps is because that market is set up to succeed: There are free apps, low-priced-but-good apps like Clear and then premium —well designed and supported — apps like OmniFocus and Things.

    I don’t see the same quality-spectrum in writing apps, blogging apps, weather, flashlights, camera, etc. Where are they?

    They don’t exist, because, I suspect, the cost to make apps at such a high-level is too costly to be supported by 10,000 downloads at `$0.69` each. So you either get premium apps for less money, and less support over time, or you simply don’t get those apps.

    That’s what makes Dark Sky so interesting. It competes in the weather category, with free apps, yet charges `$4.99` to purchase — keep in mind that really Dark Sky does one thing: tells you the chance of rain in the next 90 minutes only. Dark Sky took the route I am talking about: pricing a premium product at a premium level and ignoring what the rest of the competition are priced at.

    [1]: http://www.marco.org/2013/05/10/tire-kickers
    [2]: http://www.omnigroup.com/products/omnifocus-iphone/

  • Navigation Help

    One of the most interesting fields in technology right now is navigation. Navigation systems have truly taken the world by storm: Almost every American now relies on some form of computer navigation system to get from point ‘A’ to point ‘I’ve-never-been-there-before’. We now live in a world where people blindly follow navigation instructions from computers, even if they defy common sense. Party hosts often note if there’s a turn you should override your GPS guidance on — even though we all know we’ll obey the voice in the box.

    The thing is, I don’t really ever *need* full blown turn by turn directions — and I suspect you don’t either. In fact, most of the time I just need a little help. I usually know how to get to the general area of where I’m going, I just don’t know exactly which building it is on the block, or exactly what street to turn down.

    What I could really use is a system that says: “head toward the place that cuts your hair. I’ll let you know when you need to do anything differently.” If you think about it, our cars and cellphones already know the places we frequent: the places that we don’t require turn-by-turn directions to get to.

    So why shouldn’t these systems allow us to just focus on driving (a daunting enough task for most) and only interject when we need to by taken off the path that we already know.

    A lot of the places I go to are located in an area I’m familiar with: I know *roughly* how to get there, rather than how to get to the *precise* location.

    Give me Siri guidance that says: “Head towards Tacoma Boys. It’s a block or two past that — I’ll let you know when you’re close.” And then, when I get close, turn-by-turn kicks in to make sure I get to the exact spot.

    90% of the time, I can get 90% of the way to anywhere I’m going. Give me a navigation system that only helps for the last 10%, so that I can concentrate on driving instead of being annoyed by the bitch-in-the-box for the entire journey.

  • ‘I Hate Dogs’

    [Farhad Manjoo on the maddening issue of dogs being fucking everywhere in the U.S.][1]:

    > But here’s my problem: There’s now a cultural assumption that everyone must love dogs. Dog owners are rarely forced to reckon with the idea that there are people who aren’t enthralled by their furry friends, and that taking their dogs everywhere might not be completely pleasant for these folks.

    I find people who brings dogs everywhere with them — including into the office — to be rude. I can’t stand having dogs everywhere. You know where dogs belong? In your fenced yard at home. Not your purse. Not my office. Not my building. Not on your fucking lap as you down your tenth Venti-Non-Fat-Extra-Whip-Frapp.

    [1]: http://www.slate.com/articles/life/a_fine_whine/2013/05/i_hate_dogs_they_re_lounging_in_our_offices_and_licking_us_at_our_cafes.single.html