Top Posts


Recent Articles

  • A Mac Consultant

    [Patrick Rhone doling out tips for those that want to be a Mac consultant][1] hits the ultimate tip: > Another great value add that gets a lot of bang for the buck — clean the screen. I keep a few of these Klear Screen Travel Singles in my bag. If someone’s screen needs a clean…

    [Patrick Rhone doling out tips for those that want to be a Mac consultant][1] hits the ultimate tip:

    > Another great value add that gets a lot of bang for the buck — clean the screen. I keep a few of these Klear Screen Travel Singles in my bag. If someone’s screen needs a clean (and, trust me, most do) go ahead and do it. It’s another “extra mile” thing that they don’t think about doing and no other consultant does either (unless they read this, of course).

    I’d add that if someone asked me if they could clean my screen (even free of charge) I would flat out say no. But if someone was working on my computer and just cleaned the screen, I’d be pretty happy about it when I noticed it. What a great little tip, and little things like this can be done in any industry — you just have to pay attention.

    [1]: http://patrickrhone.com/2013/04/14/so-you-wanna-be-a-mac-consultant-now/

  • New and Shiny

    Each time I hear about Apple’s stock price taking another hit, or being undervalued, I can’t help but shake my head. Wall Street seems hell bent on tanking share prices for Apple over the notion that, though the company is not currently sinking, they are mere moments from striking the proverbial iceberg. You’ve heard the…

    Each time I hear about Apple’s stock price taking another hit, or being undervalued, I can’t help but shake my head. Wall Street seems hell bent on tanking share prices for Apple over the notion that, though the company is not currently sinking, they are mere moments from striking the proverbial iceberg.

    You’ve heard the arguments before: iPhone is boring, iOS is boring, iPad is boring, there’s nothing *NEW*. The counter arguments from more rational folk are strong: $100+ billion cash in the bank, profit leaders in handsets and tablets, growing computer sales amid a shrinking market, no need to change, and so on.

    The problem is that both camps are wrong. Yes, Apple products are a bit boring, but they are boring because they just work as expected, not because they are bad products. Apple products are boring by design, and it just so happens that boring in this case is actually good. It’s also true that Apple is banking a lot of cash everyday, but even if Apple can run the company for years off its cash stockpile without selling a single damned thing, well that doesn’t mean that everything is OK — it’s just a *thing* that Apple could do.

    Either way you look at it, both the ‘Apple is fine’ and ‘Apple is doomed’ camps are looking at the wrong things and drawing the wrong conclusions.

    Apple does need excitement or they *will* eventually have to start dipping into that hoard of cash. This is not to say that Apple *needs* to make a watch or a TV set, but that Apple needs to get back out front, and be the leader that everyone else is chasing.

    Because, news flash, Android and Windows Phone 8 *are* damned good. Because Samsung *is* making compelling phones. And it’s only a matter of time before there is a tablet that can rival the iPad lineup.

    There’s no more time for Apple to rest on its laurels, yet that’s what it seems Apple is doing.

    You can preach all you want that Apple only does things when they are good and ready to do them, but that doesn’t work in today’s world. You can’t sit back and watch your competitor release a new and exciting (for someone), phone every quarter and say to yourself “pshhaw, iPhone”. That doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for Wall Street, for tech journalists, for tech consumers, and most importantly for share holders.

    Each of those groups wants just one thing: new and shiny.

    Samsung is full of new and shiny, but Apple really isn’t right now. Apple’s modus operandi has been: new and shiny only when making a huge splash (e.g. iPhone, iPod, iPad), the rest of the time Apple just milks the product for everything it is worth. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a great strategy provided you know when the milk is about to run out.

    I think this explains the stock price conundrum: The deflated stock price has nothing to do with innovation or anything else, it’s about new and shiny — and Apple is lacking in that field — so investors are worried that Apple doesn’t know when the cow is about to dry up.

    Laptops and desktops are old and boring no matter what you do to them. Tablets and smart phones are hot items, and Apple has yet to make a change to their lineup that screams “new and shiny”.

    Right or wrong, this is how the world works now.

    This also explains the iPad mini craze. The iPad mini sold like hot cakes — to the tune of people not being able to buy them fast enough. They sold like crazy not because they were better, but because every person could instantly tell that your iPad mini was/is, “new and shiny”. That’s not *just* another iPad, it’s *the* **new** iPad.

    That’s powerful stuff.

    At first glance you can’t tell an iPad 2 from 4. You can’t tell an iPhone 4 from 4S, and many can’t tell you have an iPhone 5 until they are holding it. That’s problematic when consumers are eager to show off their forward-thinking, money-wasting, ways.

    Apple can survive for years staying the course they are on — truly they can. But then they become Microsoft, and my how Microsoft is struggling these days. Office has no new and shiny, and the new Windows 8 doesn’t seem to matter.

    The key for Apple is going to be recognizing how long they can stay in the churning-amazing-profits-era and when they have to move back to new and shiny disruption era. I don’t think Apple is there yet, but by the same token it certainly feels like we are getting close.

    ***

    My litmus test for “new and shiny” is what I call the stranger effect. That is, if you take your latest Apple gear into a public place and use it — do any strangers stop and ask you about it?

    The Powerbook G4 had that effect when I first got one, same with: iPod, iPhone, iPad, iPad mini. But when I switched to the iPhone 5, no one noticed. When I upgraded from the iPad to the iPad 2 and then to the iPad 3 — no one noticed.

    When people stop asking, stop noticing, that’s when the new and shiny is gone. It’s not a sign that you need to drop everything for a new product, but I do believe it is the sign that you need to start thinking about what is next.

  • New Backpacks

    There’s a couple of new backpacks that have come out that I feel are worth mentioning to fellow backpack nerds. The first is the [Synapse 25][1] from Tom Bihn. This is a larger version of the current [Synapse 19][2], meant to be of equivalent size as my [beloved][3] ((See part [II][4],[III][5],[IV][6] of my Smart Alec…

    There’s a couple of new backpacks that have come out that I feel are worth mentioning to fellow backpack nerds.

    The first is the [Synapse 25][1] from Tom Bihn. This is a larger version of the current [Synapse 19][2], meant to be of equivalent size as my [beloved][3] ((See part [II][4],[III][5],[IV][6] of my Smart Alec reviews.)) [Smart Alec][7]. The key difference seems to be that the Synapse 25 is a more pocket friendly bag.

    While the Smart Alec is basically one large cavern, the Synapse seems better for those that like more pockets. I would also note that the Synapse is designed for the Cache style laptop sleeves, which are not as protective as the Brain Cell style that the Smart Alec uses. That in no way is a deal breaker, but should be noted if you want maximum protection. The Synapse is a bit heavier, but I would guess that both bags weigh close to the same when they are loaded with laptop sleeves and such.

    Next up is the [Goruck SK26][8], this is essentially the GR1 (which is a great bag) without all the military detailing on the outside of the bag. Molle straps and velcro are gone, and the bag looks fantastic.

    The GR1 is a very odd backpack. [I love it][9], but I prefer the Smart Alec in almost every situation. Having said that, if I could, I would trade in my GR1 for this bag right away. It looks better, and I would feel far more comfortable traveling with it overseas instead of the GR1 (due to its less aggressive looks).

    *** ***
    Overall two very nice new bags, it’s going to be hard resisting the new Goruck. As for the Synapse, I have no doubt many will prefer it to the Smart Alec, but I’m not so sure I will be one who would prefer it.

    [1]: http://www.tombihn.com/PROD/TB0111.html
    [2]: http://www.tombihn.com/briefcases/TB0110.html
    [3]: https://brooksreview.net/2011/12/backpacks-my-bff/
    [4]: https://brooksreview.net/2011/12/sa-pt-ii/
    [5]: https://brooksreview.net/2012/02/sa-pt-iii/
    [6]: https://brooksreview.net/2012/05/diaper-bag/
    [7]: http://www.tombihn.com/PROD/TB0103.html
    [8]: https://www.goruck.com/Gear/Details/SK26-black
    [9]: https://brooksreview.net/2012/12/gr1/

  • Quote of the Day: koeselitz

    “Forgetfulness is not the ideal when it comes to youthful indiscretion, as much as we in our self-loathing and shame may feel it is. The ideal is forgiveness.” — koeselitz [h/t to reader Rory M.]

    “Forgetfulness is not the ideal when it comes to youthful indiscretion, as much as we in our self-loathing and shame may feel it is. The ideal is forgiveness.”
    koeselitz [h/t to reader Rory M.]
  • LCD Font Smoothing

    [Doug Bowman shares a top tip][1] on Twitter, his tip? To turn off LCD font smoothing on your Mac to get more readable text. I made the change this morning on my retina MacBook Pro and wow is text sharp. Looks fantastic now. I wonder what the origins of this feature are… [1]: https://twitter.com/stop/status/322140733895225345

    [Doug Bowman shares a top tip][1] on Twitter, his tip? To turn off LCD font smoothing on your Mac to get more readable text. I made the change this morning on my retina MacBook Pro and wow is text sharp. Looks fantastic now.

    I wonder what the origins of this feature are…

    [1]: https://twitter.com/stop/status/322140733895225345

  • The Private Network Effect

    For as long as I can remember I’ve been a golfer. I enjoy the hell out of golf, even though I’ve never been very good at it. A lot of things can ruin my enjoyment of a game of golf: Other people, other people that suck more than me, shit course-maintenance, and so forth can…

    For as long as I can remember I’ve been a golfer. I enjoy the hell out of golf, even though I’ve never been very good at it. A lot of things can ruin my enjoyment of a game of golf: Other people, other people that suck more than me, shit course-maintenance, and so forth can really make golf a frustrating game.

    For most of my life I played only on public courses, dealing with the public and not knowing better. Then, after college, I joined a private golf club. A club where there are no tee times because they aren’t needed. Where people pay a lot of money *every* month for the privilege to play the course and therefore respect and care for it. Where you can often play several holes without seeing another soul. A course that is immaculately maintained and cared for.

    The difference between a public and a private golf course is so profound that it’s hard to play a public course after being a member of a private course. It’s like flying coach your entire life, and then getting a [first class seat on Asiana][1] — it’s damned hard to go back.

    That’s the difference between Twitter and App.net to me. Twitter is the public golf course, the coach seat. It’s where everyone is, and that’s exactly the problem. App.net is where a few people that are invested in the product, its direction, and the overall health of the service, go to socialize online.

    If you want to be part of App.net, [you can have this free account][2] (first come, first serve), and you’ll follow me automatically.

    Welcome to the first-class Twitter experience.

    [1]: http://m.youtube.com/%23/watch?v=dtX4PZiUlEw&desktop_uri=%252Fwatch%253Fv%253DdtX4PZiUlEw
    [2]: https://join.app.net/from/benbrooks

  • ReadKit

    A few weeks ago I had the good fortune to talk ‘geek’ over dinner with Justin Blanton, whose judgment I trust implicitly — to the point of immediately buying something if he says “get it” (budget allowing of course). As we were talking Justin mentioned [ReadKit][1] — something I had completely missed [him posting about][2]…

    A few weeks ago I had the good fortune to talk ‘geek’ over dinner with Justin Blanton, whose judgment I trust implicitly — to the point of immediately buying something if he says “get it” (budget allowing of course). As we were talking Justin mentioned [ReadKit][1] — something I had completely missed [him posting about][2] back in March:

    > I’ve been using ReadKit for the past few days and have to say that it’s probably the best experience of its kind on the Mac.

    That statement seems less bold when considering the poor state of offline-reading apps for the Mac. Still, Justin’s endorsement was enough for me to check it out and after using ReadKit for a couple weeks, I have to agree; it *is* a great app.

    The design and overall experience of using ReadKit is great: I especially like the ability to automatically sync with multiple sources like Instapaper and Pinboard.in.

    I’ve always used Instapaper’s official apps on iOS, but resort to the website on my Mac. Now, after adjusting my reading habits, I’m convinced that ReadKit is the best way to get through my Instapaper backlog on the Mac.

    ReadKit has its quirks, but it’s far better than having to look at [the web of shitty design][3].

    [1]: http://readkitapp.com
    [2]: http://hypertext.net/2013/03/readkit/
    [3]: https://brooksreview.net/2012/11/readable/

  • ‘How a Banner Ad for H&R Block Appeared on apple.com’

    [Nate Anderson, reporting an CMA (a local ISP)][1]: > “Wow, this is really wrong and crazy,” Henkel told me, since it suggested that companies felt free to operate as a “man in the middle,” one free to inject code of their own choosing into webpage requests that were—so users believed—simply between themselves and the websites…

    [Nate Anderson, reporting an CMA (a local ISP)][1]:

    > “Wow, this is really wrong and crazy,” Henkel told me, since it suggested that companies felt free to operate as a “man in the middle,” one free to inject code of their own choosing into webpage requests that were—so users believed—simply between themselves and the websites they were trying to reach.

    Basically the ISP was re-routing traffic to append some scripts to each website so that ads, *their* ads, would be shown on *every* webpage. Incredible.

    This smells like a lawsuit waiting to happen:

    > And it turned out that the R66T code didn’t just add banner ads to sites that had none; it even overwrote its own ads onto high profile sites like the Huffington Post, which had plenty of ads of their own.

    Now, R66T, also has a great “feature” that they market:

    > One of their product pitches, for instance, describes a hotel Wi-Fi system that creates an “ever-present toolbar or frame around the page that can display relevant content and information” and can handle “insertion of property related ads and promotional messages, as well as blacklisting competitors’ ads throughout the entire Web session.” A further item says that property managers can “feel secure in knowing that your competitors are not able to poach your customers while they are at your property.”

    Both companies have been vague in responding to this, but CMA seems to have stopped using R66T to inject ads. However both companies seem to have updated policies in an ass-covering move that likely won’t cover their ass.

    When an ISP pulls shit like this, they should be shut down — plain and simple.

    [1]: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/04/how-a-banner-ad-for-hs-ok/?utm_source=feedburner

  • Quote of the Day: Matt Drance

    “Users are their currency, and Facebook is about to rob the bank.” — Matt Drance

    “Users are their currency, and Facebook is about to rob the bank.”
  • ‘Web Privacy, and How Consumers Let Down Their Guard’

    [Somini Sengupta writing about Alessandro Acquisti, a behavioral economist at Carnegie Mellon University][1]: > Over all, his research argues that when it comes to privacy, policy makers should carefully consider how people actually behave. We don’t always act in our own best interest, his research suggests. We can be easily manipulated by how we are…

    [Somini Sengupta writing about Alessandro Acquisti, a behavioral economist at Carnegie Mellon University][1]:

    > Over all, his research argues that when it comes to privacy, policy makers should carefully consider how people actually behave. We don’t always act in our own best interest, his research suggests. We can be easily manipulated by how we are asked for information. Even something as simple as a playfully designed site can nudge us to reveal more of ourselves than a serious-looking one.

    This is a very interesting read for anyone interested in how people value their privacy. Be sure to read through the section that talks about how engineering the order and way questions are stated make respondents more likely to share more information.

    It’s fascinating, but this bit is scary:

    > Mr. Acquisti offers a sobering counterpoint. In 2011, he took snapshots with a webcam of nearly 100 students on campus. Within minutes, he had identified about one-third of them using facial recognition software. In addition, for about a fourth of the subjects whom he could identify, he found out enough about them on Facebook to guess at least a portion of their Social Security numbers.

    I think the Social Security point is less likely to happen to people born recently (as the way that SSN numbers are assigned as been randomized), but man is that creepy.

    [1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/technology/web-privacy-and-how-consumers-let-down-their-guard.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0&pagewanted=all

  • Start Paying

    [Lex Friedman fighting the good fight](http://www.macworld.com/article/2032847/a-5-app-isnt-expensive-customers-need-to-help-fix-the-app-store-economy.html): > Many free apps are fine. But when you pay for a premium app, you are often paying for a deeper, more well-considered experience—one in which you are truly the customer, and not the advertisers supporting the “free” app behind the scenes. And, a bit later: > You don’t…

    [Lex Friedman fighting the good fight](http://www.macworld.com/article/2032847/a-5-app-isnt-expensive-customers-need-to-help-fix-the-app-store-economy.html):

    > Many free apps are fine. But when you pay for a premium app, you are often paying for a deeper, more well-considered experience—one in which you are truly the customer, and not the advertisers supporting the “free” app behind the scenes.

    And, a bit later:

    > You don’t buy a Kindle just to enjoy the dictionary and manual that come pre-installed on the device. You shouldn’t buy an iPhone to enjoy only free apps, either. You’re cheating yourself, all because we’ve become conditioned to feeling that $5 is a lot to spend on an app. It’s okay to pay for good products.

    My favorite thing to hear is people complaining about the poor quality or lack of features in apps, but refusing to pay for another app that is better in every way because “that one costs a dollar!” *Idiots*.

    The worst part about this is that the quality of apps can’t and won’t improve if developers aren’t properly compensated for their time. This worries me the most, that despite my emphasis on paying, in the end it won’t matter because I’m one of the few paying and it won’t be enough to support excellent ad-free apps.

  • The Pants Defense of Texas

    [Tim Cushing on stupidity in Texas](http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130402/19381122555/eff-files-amicus-brief-texas-high-court-battling-state-prosecutors-claims-that-searching-cell-phone-is-no-different-than.shtml): > Arguing that a cell phone is nothing more than a set of pants pockets is deliberately understating the reality in order to justify skirting the Fourth Amendment. The argument is that because a cellphone is in a person’s pocket, it is fine to search the contents of the…

    [Tim Cushing on stupidity in Texas](http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130402/19381122555/eff-files-amicus-brief-texas-high-court-battling-state-prosecutors-claims-that-searching-cell-phone-is-no-different-than.shtml):

    > Arguing that a cell phone is nothing more than a set of pants pockets is deliberately understating the reality in order to justify skirting the Fourth Amendment.

    The argument is that because a cellphone is in a person’s pocket, it is fine to search the contents of the cellphone if you already are searching the pants. Which is stupid and has been shut down twice, though Texas is trying a third time.

    Personally I think the smart move is for cellphones to delete after just three bad pass code unlocks instead of ten. Then I could let the police delete the contents by telling them the wrong code just three times.

  • Quote of the Day: Seth Godin

    “All too often, the ones who are aggressively seeking the theory of the day don’t have a lot to show for what they did yesterday.” — Seth Godin

    “All too often, the ones who are aggressively seeking the theory of the day don’t have a lot to show for what they did yesterday.”
  • Quote of the Day: Chris Bowler

    “Ev and Biz have shown they can build amazing services, but they haven’t proven to build services that are profitable.” — Chris Bowler

    “Ev and Biz have shown they can build amazing services, but they haven’t proven to build services that are profitable.”
  • ‘As Web Search Goes Mobile, Competitors Chip at Google’s Lead’

    [Claire Cain Miller][1]: > In the future, Google could answer more complicated questions, Mr. Gomes said, like “How far is it from here to the Eiffel Tower?” and “Where could I go to a concert in warm weather next year?” I wanted to link to this and simply post a screenshot of Siri providing the…

    [Claire Cain Miller][1]:

    > In the future, Google could answer more complicated questions, Mr. Gomes said, like “How far is it from here to the Eiffel Tower?” and “Where could I go to a concert in warm weather next year?”

    I wanted to link to this and simply post a screenshot of Siri providing the answer to the first question. It didn’t work. Siri couldn’t parse that original question, instead telling me my location. The second question prompted a straight web search.

    It’s clear to me that this is where search is headed, and it’s also clear that this is exactly the kind of search/task that Siri was made to do.

    So the question really is: who builds a reliable product first?

    Google has an obvious edge given the sheer power of their search tool and the data they have backing it up.

    What I wouldn’t do is count Apple out. Because while Siri isn’t always great, Apple has no problem partnering with people like Yelp, OpenTable, Wolfram|Alpha, and so on to get the data that they need to make a better product.

    Apple will build what they need, but only if they actually have to build it, whereas Google will always build what they need because they desire to own all the information.

    That’s an odd role reversal for the two companies.

    [1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/04/technology/as-web-search-goes-mobile-apps-chip-at-googles-lead.html

  • The Weak Gesture

    President Obama [announced][1] that he would return 5% of his salary every month for 2013. He does so as a gesture of solidarity with other federal workers who are getting shafted. This is a stupid and pointless gesture. As the New York Times notes, the 5% being returned will equal $16,667 dollars over the course…

    President Obama [announced][1] that he would return 5% of his salary every month for 2013. He does so as a gesture of solidarity with other federal workers who are getting shafted.

    This is a stupid and pointless gesture.

    As the New York Times notes, the 5% being returned will equal $16,667 dollars over the course of this year. What exactly is that supposed to accomplish?

    I will give the president this: it *is* a gesture. I’m just not sure what the gesture is.

    I think there are two ways to look at this:

    1. That Obama is doing something noble. He is trying to stand “with the people” and show that he too is willing to “suffer” financially.
    2. That it is a pointless fucking gesture.

    I, unsurprisingly, want to focus on point two.

    ## The Pointless Gesture

    Before I get you all riled up, it’s best to understand exactly what the President of the United States of America gets. Here’s a [pretty good break down][2], which summarized is:

    – $400,000 yearly salary.
    – $50,000 expense account (annually)
    – Free home to live in.
    – Staff to do anything and everything (34 people).
    – Chef (actually, 5)
    – Transportation
    – Security (Which is an understatement)
    – Office
    – Retirement that is in the millions ((Interestingly it is noted that Dub-ya declined his retirement.))
    – A lot more.

    To be honest, all of this sounds perfectly reasonable to me — I am in no way saying this should be changed or disallowed. However, given all of that, now take into account how much the Obama’s have made personally (book sales mostly) [since 2000][3]: $18,563,000. Good for them, honestly, but now are you starting to realize why $16,677 is a pretty fucking pointless gesture?

    It’s also worth pointing out that Clinton received $15 million in advances for his post-Presidential book. Obama is likely to receive more given his status as the first non-old-white-guy U.S. President (among many other reasons).

    [@CJCHILVERS on App.net][4]:

    > Let’s see, poverty is up to 1960s levels, gas has tripled since 2008, the debt is unfathomably high and no one can say exactly how many are now unemployed…Yeah, a 5% pay cut should do it.

    *Pointless fucking gesture.*

    But there’s more to this than just taking some money and giving it back, because to me this admits two things:

    1. Giving back part of your pay, in my mind, is an admission that you failed to fully perform your duties. It’s no different than getting short-changed an appetizer at a restaurant and instead of just getting the food, you just don’t get charged for it. *You still wanted that appetizer, now you are hungry(er).*
    2. Since this isn’t a one-time repayment, and instead a re-payment over the course of the year, this to me is admission that the President isn’t expecting to be able to better perform his job going forward.

    All of this coming from “the leader of the free world” or whatever tagline is trendy this year.

    So to recap:

    – Obama already has plenty of money
    – Obama really has no need for money at present
    – He is giving back only $16,667 of the $18+ million he has made over the last 13 years.
    – The money he is giving back absolutely solves nothing — probably doesn’t even pay for the time of the person(s) that need to make all the ledger moves and account for it.
    – Feels like an admission that he has failed, and will continue to fail, as the President of the United States.

    I don’t like it. Sends the wrong message to Americans and the world. If I’m another country, I just witnessed the President of the United States saying that he has failed to do his job fully.

    Come to think of it, this gesture isn’t pointless, but actually a sign of weakness.

    [1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/04/us/politics/to-highlight-pain-of-budget-cuts-obama-to-return-of-part-of-pay.html
    [2]: http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1478184
    [3]: http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity/barack-obama-fortune/
    [4]: https://alpha.app.net/cjchilvers/post/4441192

  • Quote of the Day: Marcus Fehn

    “People will (and should) judge the shipping product and not some promises, so what you’ll get is what we shipped, and we need to be confident about it, and we are — all is good.” — Marcus Fehn

    “People will (and should) judge the shipping product and not some promises, so what you’ll get is what we shipped, and we need to be confident about it, and we are — all is good.”
  • Ulysses III

    Sometimes, when something new comes along, I can’t help but be a little giddy about it. I see the email, the announcement, the download link, and all I can think is “Shit I am driving right now, should I pull over?” Such was the case when I got an email from Max Seelemann telling me…

    Sometimes, when something new comes along, I can’t help but be a little giddy about it. I see the email, the announcement, the download link, and all I can think is “Shit I am driving right now, should I pull over?”

    Such was the case when I got an email from Max Seelemann telling me that [Ulysses III][1] had been submitted to the Mac App Store and was awaiting approval **and**, that in the meantime, here was the beta preview of the app. I didn’t pull over, but I did make sure that downloading and playing with the app was the very first thing I did when I got back to my Mac.

    I’ve been using Ulysses for [a long time][2], I love the app, but it fell by the wayside as I fell in [love with Writer][3]. I’ve had some sneak peaks and some beta builds of the Ulysses III text editor, but nothing that would prepare me for how excellent Ulysses III truly is.

    Ulysses III, fullscreen in three pane mode.

    Just take a look at the app in the screenshot to the right. That’s full screen mode, with the navigation panes shown. Of course the app does a more “pure” full screen with just text, but the design with the panes is immensely beautiful. It’s flat, but rich. It’s subtle, but easy to see. Truth be told, I stopped and cleaned my screen so that I may fully enjoy it.

    Some other things that are great about the app:

    1. Ulysses can now be used on your iOS device through [Daedalus Touch][5]. Daedalus Touch is an excellent iOS text editor that has always had one glaring omission: your words were trapped in that app. Not any more, as Ulysses III will pull those files to your Mac and show them in the sidebar as you see in the above screenshot. What’s even nicer is that not all your files are synced, allowing you to get rid of things you don’t want to see on iOS, and yet still be able to see everything on your Mac. Perfect.
    2. Solarized and Markdown are built in. The app has a couple of neat things: when you launch it the app will ask which style of Markdown you use (underscores or asterisk) ((Asterisks are the original, and should always be used.)) and remember that setting. The app has a very beautiful transition between Solarized light and dark themes and automatically defaults to the dark theme when you go fullscreen — a very nice touch.
    3. You can select your own font, or make your own color scheme. But truth be told all you really need to do is change the font from Menlo to Nitti Light and select Solarized.

    If you had previously tried Ulysses and didn’t like it, now is the time to give it another look. It’s simpler, it’s refined. Ulysses of old is like the current (non-two) version of the OmniFocus for Mac, and the new version, Ulysses III, is OmniFocus for iPad. That’s the difference level — that’s the simplicity and power this app packs.

    What I like, that Writer doesn’t give me, is the navigation of my files. The iCloud file picker on Mac is broken at best and useless on most occasions — yet that is all I use. To be able to group, sort, search, link, and sync files all within a beautiful interface without having to ever manage files in the Finder, or the confusing iCloud file picker, is a breath of fresh air.

    I don’t know how best to explain my preference for Ulysses III over Writer, so the best analogy I could come up with is this: Writer feels like the perfect piece of paper, with the perfect pen, while Ulysses III feels like the perfect notebook, with the perfect pen. There will always be times when one piece of paper is desirable over a notebook, but those are less often than the times when a notebook is more desirable.

    This analogy also fits with the difference between file management. Where with Writer you are stuck with many sheets of paper that are easily misplaced and only loosely paper clipped together. With Ulysses everything is in one place, bound together, it can get crowded if you are not careful, but works much better than the former. (I created an Archive box for finished works in Ulysses, which cleans things up nicely.)

    I’ve moved Writer out of my Home screen and replaced it with Daedalus Touch, and have and will, be only writing in Ulysses III. I can’t recommend it enough.

    It’s on sale for a week at $19.99, and the final price with be $39.99. [Go buy it][6]. (Likewise [Daedalus Touch][7] is only $0.99 right now.)

    (See also: [Brett Terpstra’s take on it.](http://brettterpstra.com/2013/04/03/mac-app-review-ulysses-iii/))

    [1]: https://itunes.apple.com/app/ulysses-iii/id623795237?ls=1&mt=12
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2010/11/writing-tools/
    [3]: https://brooksreview.net/2012/03/writing-2/
    [5]: https://itunes.apple.com/app/daedalus-touch-text-editor/id406964546
    [6]: https://itunes.apple.com/app/ulysses-iii/id623795237?ls=1&mt=12
    [7]: https://itunes.apple.com/app/daedalus-touch-text-editor/id406964546

  • ‘My Divorce From Google – One Year Later’

    [Tom Henderson on leaving Google behind][1]: > What I’ve concluded is that I’m happy, and I find that Google and SEO and tracking have soiled the web in unbelievable ways. Google has imposed a constraint on content through its ad business that I can’t get away from, because content is trying to adapt to Google…

    [Tom Henderson on leaving Google behind][1]:

    > What I’ve concluded is that I’m happy, and I find that Google and SEO and tracking have soiled the web in unbelievable ways. Google has imposed a constraint on content through its ad business that I can’t get away from, because content is trying to adapt to Google so it can be found, but especially because content becomes monetized in doing so– to the detriment of us all.

    That’s an interesting thought, and something I hadn’t thought about. It’s sad to think about how much sites tweak their content and headlines just in hopes of a few extra clicks on Google and subsequently their Google Ads.

    One thing that many of you have asked about in response to my [post last week about valuing privacy more than money][2], is why. Why is privacy so important?

    Let’s let former Google CEO and current Chairman Eric ‘Uncle Creepy’ Schmidt answer that for you, as reported by [Holman W. Jenkins Jr.][3]:

    > “I don’t believe society understands what happens when everything is available, knowable and recorded by everyone all the time,” he says. He predicts, apparently seriously, that every young person one day will be entitled automatically to change his or her name on reaching adulthood in order to disown youthful hijinks stored on their friends’ social media sites.

    Any questions?

    [1]: http://www.itworld.com/software/350485/my-divorce-google-one-year-later
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2013/03/quit-i-dare-you/
    [3]: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704901104575423294099527212.html

  • Black Maple Hill

    A good friend of mine wanted to get a really great present for another good friend of ours — he wanted to get a bottle of Pappy, or better known as Pappy Van Winkle. Now if you know anything about Bourbon, that particular whiskey is the holy grail of American whiskeys right now. *If* you…

    A good friend of mine wanted to get a really great present for another good friend of ours — he wanted to get a bottle of Pappy, or better known as Pappy Van Winkle. Now if you know anything about Bourbon, that particular whiskey is the holy grail of American whiskeys right now. *If* you can even find a bottle, you’d be lucky to afford it — “empty” bottles sell on Ebay for well over twice the retail cost (usually more).

    If you find it in a bar, drink it. If you find a bottle, buy it.

    Since Pappy was out of the question he sought after Black Maple Hill — [a whiskey he learned about in this Wall Street Journal feature][1].

    As luck would have it he snagged what appears to be the last bottle in the state, and gave it as a gift. Luckily for us, our friend opened the bottle and allowed us to partake.

    Holy shit.

    I’ve spoken here about my love for a fine single malt, typically not much of a bourbon fan (which Black Maple Hill is), but I am always open to trying other whiskeys.

    Black Maple Hill is perhaps one of the best whiskeys I have ever had, hands down, no question. Best of luck finding it.

    [1]: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324532004578362663959730642.html