Dave Caolo is also stumbling with iPhoto for iOS:
>None of them are labeled and I don’t know what they do. Tapping the icons on the left only deepens the confusion.
I hear ya Dave, I hear ya.
Dave Caolo is also stumbling with iPhoto for iOS:
>None of them are labeled and I don’t know what they do. Tapping the icons on the left only deepens the confusion.
I hear ya Dave, I hear ya.
K. T. Bradford has more info on Verizon tethering with the iPad:
>However, a Verizon Wireless spokesperson informed me that for tablets (including the new iPad), the mobile hotspot feature is included in the data plan’s price. iPad owners won’t have to pay extra to activate mobile hotspot, even with the 1GB plan.
Nice, still waiting word from AT&T…
Bryan M. Wolfe:
>According to the report, AT&T and Verizon, through Twitter posts, both indicated the hotspot feature won’t be available, at least not when the new tablet is launched March 16. This, of course, is regrettable given that these are the only two US carriers offering LTE plans for the iDevice.
I am shocked, *shocked*, I tell you. Also, who wants to bet that Verizon enables it before AT&T? ((Another reason I chose Verizon this time around.))
Also, on the subject of my pal Shawn, he is running a membership drive this week. There are some great prizes, but more importantly [diapers are expensive](http://shawnblanc.net/2012/02/noah-blanc/) so go sign up.
Shawn Blanc:
>What is Condé Nast going to do with their magazine apps? Their current issues (which use images even for text) are going to look horrible on the Retina display and if they start making their files 4x bigger then the downloads will get even more ridiculous — growing into the ballpark of an 800 MB file. At that size, after few back issues of The New Yorker and Wired and your iPad’s storage will be maxed out.
First, isn’t it just 2x bigger on the iPad? But Shawn makes a great point here: the decision of magazines publishers to use crappy image only tools for text is going to show how short-sighted of a decision it was on March 16th 2012. Here’s hoping magazines pull their collective heads our of their collective asses and use better tools.
Update: About the 4x versus 2x debate. It’s 4x the pixels, but my thought is that is misleading because you are basically just doubling the size. Looks like I am wrong, or at least in the minority on this thinking though. Oh well.
Update 2: Yeah, I am wrong about the sizes. Not the first time. Carry on, nothing to see here.
Congratulations. By updating to iOS 5.1 your iPhone 4S suddenly got 4G! Except it didn’t really, because as [Brad McCarty explains](http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/03/08/att-apple-hspa-lie/):
>The iPhone didn’t suddenly become an LTE-capable capable device by simply upgrading the version of iOS that it’s running. AT&T is defining its HSPA+ network as 4G, but by the very definition of HSPA+, theoretical speeds aside, it doesn’t qualify as 4G.
So what the hell, Apple? McCarty sees this as Apple caving to AT&T — and that may well be — but more worrisome is that this move is pretty hypocritical and deceitful. [Here’s Phil Schiller at the iPhone 4S launch as quoted by GDGT](http://live.gdgt.com/live-apple-iphone-4s-event-coverage/):
>“Where have I heard these numbers before? This is what our competitors call 4G… the iPhone 4S is just as fast as all of these phones, even faster in real-world use.”
Yet, Apple refused to call the speed `4G` and many people (myself included) applauded them for that decision.
Now though? Now we have the *same* iPhone 4S and suddenly also get the bullshit `4G` moniker — that would be bad enough, but it gets even worse for users that don’t know about the difference.
AT&T is pretty horrible about this because if you viewed their coverage map when deciding between your shiny new 4G iPad on Verizon or AT&T — you immediately saw that AT&T appears to have a pretty robust 4G network. [Everything in the darkest blue is 4G according to AT&T](http://www.att.com/network/?wtSlotClick=1-006S2O-0-1) (also note that this is *not* the coverage map that Apple links to on the iPad buying page):

So the average person is likely going to see that AT&T has `4G` in just about every major city on the two coasts. That’s fantastic — I was almost fooled by this.
Then you read the map and see that `4G LTE` is by cities, denoted by the large orange blob. Fantastic: no LTE in the Pacific Northwest. So when you look at this map to determine 4G coverage, you really just need to be looking for giant, inaccurate, orange blobs.
Now, compare that to how [Verizon markets `4G` service](http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/CoverageLocatorController?requesttype=NEWREQUEST&zip=94531&city=Antioch&state=CA):

Everything in dark, dark, red is 4G LTE — every other red area is simply 3G. Now it is true that Verizon doesn’t have the faux-4G that AT&T does, so they might not be as good as they seem. One thing I can tell you for sure: Verizon has more 4G LTE areas (and a zoomable map).
Long story short: `4G` and `4G LTE` are not equals, and shame on Apple for misleading iPhone users with the `4G` tag that AT&T so clearly loves to toss about.
Jonathan Bennett:
>The desktop version of iPhoto, and indeed all of Apple’s iOS apps until now, use Google Maps. The new iPhoto for iOS, however, uses Apple’s own map tiles – made from OpenStreetMap data (outside the US).
So what are they using in the US?
TSA responds to [that video about the guy walking through their machines with a large metal object](https://brooksreview.net/2012/03/tsa-metal-detection-skills/). Instead of disproving that it is possible to do what the video shows, they just talk about how fantastic their security is.
We recorded a special mid-week episode to talk about Apple’s iPad event.
This is gold.
I have only played with iPhoto for iOS for a bit now, but I am not the only one that thinks it is a pretty unintuitive and confusing app to use. I don’t even know what I did half the time, or if the button I pressed worked.
@BenjaminBrooks I deleted a photo accidentally, only to discover I’d actually “hidden” it, only to discover I don’t know how to “unhide” it.
— Chuck Skoda (@skoda) March 7, 2012
That about sums it up.
Doesn’t look like it to me.
Now live in the App Store. (It doesn’t read the SD card from my GX1 via the Camera Connection kit — no surprise given that Aperture doesn’t read it either.)
Black, 32GB, 4G on Verizon. At least if they ever take my order…
Bruce Schneier:
>Changes in security systems can be slow. Society has to implement any new security technology as a group, which implies agreement and coordination and — in some instances — a lengthy bureaucratic procurement process. Meanwhile, an attacker can just use the new technology.
Fraser Speirs:
>If you’re going to download and install apps from all over the web, you had better be sure that the base OS is bang up to date with security patches. That’s simply not what you get with Android.
>This is one of those places where Google’s inability to move the installed base to new OS releases is actively harmful.
Well that’s just a fantastic waste of money and privacy.
Site gets bonus points for its name.