Khoi Vinh on iPad magazine sizes:
>Eventually we will get enough bandwidth so that we can download the 150 megabytes or more that these apps ask us to retrieve. Though what I fear is that when we have that capacity, publishers will be asking us to download gigabytes per issue; this is after all an industry that cannot resist imposing greater and greater demands on its users in order to impress itself.
Now *that is* impressive.
It’s taking all of my self control to not buy this bag. Oh do I want this bag.
Spoiler: LTE is *way* faster than 3G. There is also a very interesting note about using the iPad as a hotspot: it splits the bandwidth speed.
Mary-Jo Foley:
>Some folks think moves like the alleged Mac and iPad ban make sense. Others find them overblown. If current purchase levels really are low, as the alleged memo says, why go so far as to ban them, asked one former Softie. And what about knowing your enemy?
>What’s your take? If it’s really happening (which I believe it is, given where I got the e-mail), is this a smart or a pointless move on Microsoft’s part? My vote is smart. In fact, I’m surprised this policy wasn’t put in place before.
I’ve always been of the mindset that if your employees don’t want to use your own products, you have way more to worry about than whether customers see your employees using a competitors products or not. After all shouldn’t your employees be your most loyal users? And if you don’t have that, then what does that say of your future as a business? Not much.
David Barnard asked Path to delete all his user data and got a support email confirming the data was gone.
Today he signed back up and all his old data was still there for him to use.
So, I guess we know now that Path values that data more than trust?
Paul “Supersite” Thurrott amuses me greatly, so I always like to read his takes on Apple “issues”. Today he posted about the iPad heat hubbub (which I have not personally noticed):
>In the scope of things that could go wrong with a consumer electronics device, this is probably on the mild side.
Wow, right there in agreement with you Supersite.
>After all, Apple’s iPhone 4 shipped with a list of hardware defects so long, just covering them all accurately was difficult.
Say what now? The only actual “hardware defect” I can think of that he could be referencing is the antenna issue. I searched about and the only other issues that popped up were a the couple of reported battery explosions (not to minimize that danger) and home button inconsistencies. To say that the list was “so long” that they cannot be covered seems to me like the biggest jackass statement of the week.
The nerds on Twitter remember the following issues:
– Antenna.
– Battery explosions.
– The white ones being delayed forever and discoloring (I don’t recall the latter bit).
– Color issues with the screen (I thought that was resolved as a glue drying thing. Wherein once the glue dried it looked fine, perhaps I am mistaken.).
– Easily scratched (Don’t recall that, but searches did pop up complaints).
– Shattering the glass taking on and off cases That doesn’t seem like a hardware defect to me, but OK).
– Home button not feeling right on some units.
– Home button not being responsive, but was later fixed (in most cases) with software updates — meaning it was not a hardware defect in most cases.
That’s 8 issues, many of which I don’t think are fair to classify as hardware defects as much as manufacturing defects — but either way a list that is not too long to recite. Oh, Supersite.
Then Supersite just pulls me back in with this comment:
>Consumer Reports, more famous for not recommending the iPhone 4 than for its decades of consumer advocacy, is reportedly investigating. We await their ruling from on high.
LOL. Oh Supersite, you are so hit and miss.
John Gruber writing about Mike “Theatrical Performance” Daisey:
>There is no larger truth here. This is not a mistake. This is simply a lie, a lie that was told to draw attention and create sympathy at the expense of the actual truth.
And cue the deletion of any apps that display ads (unless I can pay to remove them).
Last time a deal like this came around I bought $300 worth for $240. I get no kickback here, just buy these up because they are a great deal (works not just for Music/Movies, but for Apps too).
Again you are essentially getting 20% off of every app in the App Store.
Robyn Ironside reporting on the Australian equivalent (or I assume) of the TSA
>One senior executive said in his experience, the officers were expensive window-dressing.
>”When you add the body scanners, the ritual humiliation of old ladies with knitting needles and the farcical air marshals, it all adds up to billions of dollars to prevent what? A politician being called soft on terror, that’s what,” he said.
Sounds about right.
I hope this features makes it to the release version — it’s also the kinda feature that creates a lot of browser lock-in.
Here’s a neat trick that I am sure many of you have figured out, but that I just discovered Friday night. If you have [TouchPad](http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/touchpad/id297623931?mt=8) on your iOS device (probably other apps allow this as well) you can use the `dictation` key in iOS to dictate text into your Mac.
If that sounds really easy, that’s because it is. I use this now when I am trying to type things out on our “media center” Mac mini that is hooked up to a TV without a keyboard — works surprisingly well. I for one am pretty happy with this little trick.
Not named Mophie…
Jason Grigsby researching how Apple serves high quality images to Retina screen iPads:
>As far as I can tell, there is no attempt to prevent duplicate downloads of images. New iPad users are going to download both a full desktop size image and a retina version as well.
Tim Cook responding to an analyst during the Q&A:
>We actually do love to announce new products, we just don’t do it in conference calls.
I like Cook.
*Note from Ben: This is actually a great deal from Smile because you can get 20% off software in their store — be sure to use that code before it expires though. That really means you have no excuse not to own PDFpen or TextExpander — both apps that I use daily, hell minute-ly for TE.*
TextExpander can be as simple or as geeky as you want. Whatever your level of experience, there’s a TextExpander tip for you:
**Getting Started:** Make a snippet for your email address. You’ll be amazed at the keystrokes you’ll save not having to type that over and over.
**Intermediate:** Add one of the Predefined Groups, like HTML/CSS snippets or instant URL shorteners. There’s even an AutoCorrect group to fix your typos.
**Advanced:** Try fill-in snippets, which have multiple variable fields. For example, you could have a form letter with blanks for name, product, company, etc. Type your abbreviation, fill in the fields and you’re done.
**Even More Advanced:** Create your own AppleScript and shell script snippets.
Get the [free demo](http://click.syndicateads.net/2012/03/TextExpander-2/brooksreview.html). Don’t miss the 20% off special discount. Use the coupon code SYN0312 in the [Smile store](http://sites.fastspring.com/smile/product/te?coupon=SYN0312) (Expires March 31, 2012).
Stephen Chapman pens a rather long post about the privacy concerns he sees with the dictation feature on the iPad. I am just as paranoid as the next guy (nope, probably more) and even I don’t see the problem here.
Chapman is trying to paint Apple has being shady about this, when that is far from the case.
Apple warns you that contacts and user data *will be stored* on their servers when you turn on the feature. That’s about as much as you can hope for.
The one shady part that Chapman unearthed was that Apple says it will delete the information from its servers when you disable the feature, but in the Privacy Policy it states that the information may be retained for an unspecified period.
This may sound hypocritical, and perhaps my feelings towards Apple in general are clouding my judgment, but I think Chapman is making a mountain out of a mole hill here. The two statements clearly conflict and need to be clarified, but I think it is pretty clear what Apple is doing with the information: improve the accuracy of dictation (at least according to what Apple says in the Privacy Policy).
At the very least, this is a feature you can easily turn off.