Top Posts


Recent Articles

  • ‘The Problem With Metadata’

    [Jane Mayer for *The New Yorker*][1]: > “The public doesn’t understand,” she {Susan Landau} told me, speaking about so-called metadata. “It’s much more intrusive than content.” She explained that the government can learn immense amounts of proprietary information by studying “who you call, and who they call. If you can track that, you know exactly…

    [Jane Mayer for *The New Yorker*][1]:

    > “The public doesn’t understand,” she {Susan Landau} told me, speaking about so-called metadata. “It’s much more intrusive than content.” She explained that the government can learn immense amounts of proprietary information by studying “who you call, and who they call. If you can track that, you know exactly what is happening—you don’t need the content.”

    Mayer also points out that when you are looking at just metadata the operation effectively becomes a data driven collection, whereby computers do all the heavy lifting. This means the NSA can effectively monitor every communication with minimal manpower. Yikes.

    [1]: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/06/verizon-nsa-metadata-surveillance-problem.html?mobify=0

  • Quote of the Day: Edward Snowden

    “I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant.” — Edward Snowden

    “I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant.”
  • ‘The NSA’s Dragnet’

    [Richard Dunlop-Walters has an excellent break down of PRISM and the NSA][1], so if you don’t want to read all the details, but want to be informed — Dunlop-Walters’ summary is your best bet. [*The Verge* also has a good synopsis][2] of President Hypocrite, I mean, President Obama’s remarks on the matter. President Obama’s comments…

    [Richard Dunlop-Walters has an excellent break down of PRISM and the NSA][1], so if you don’t want to read all the details, but want to be informed — Dunlop-Walters’ summary is your best bet.

    [*The Verge* also has a good synopsis][2] of President Hypocrite, I mean, President Obama’s remarks on the matter. President Obama’s comments largely can be summarized by: “Dude, totally legal, chill out. Can’t we all just snorkel this out?”

    What an asshat.

    I’ve long assumed that calls, texts, and emails are not really private. ((Side note: This makes Justin Blanton all the wiser. He requires that you use an encrypted text client called Wickr to text with him.)) Sure they are private from the average Joe, but not for the mighty “intelligence community”. What’s actually bugging me most is the file aspect of this. Because Microsoft, Google, Apple — they all *store* files for users. These files could, and many probably are, sensitive in nature — at least sensitive enough you’d actually care that the government is/can be looking at them at will.

    Add to that reports are Dropbox is about to join up. [OwnCloud][3] and [File Transporter][4] are looking better and better each day — despite the near zero developer support for them.

    [1]: http://thebrief.io/news/the-nsas-dragnet
    [2]: *The%20Verge*
    [3]: http://owncloud.org
    [4]: http://www.filetransporter.com

  • Quote of the Day: Matt Gemmell

    “The junction between mortality and mundanity is an exquisite source of perspective.” — Matt Gemmell

    “The junction between mortality and mundanity is an exquisite source of perspective.”
  • ‘U.S., British Intelligence Mining Data From Nine U.S. Internet Companies in Broad Secret Program’

    I don’t even know where to begin on this [PRISM program the NSA is running][1]. All I can say is that it is bullshit and kudos to the Washington Post for breaking the story and providing a lot of detail. Additional stories [here][2], [here][3], and [here][4]. [1]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-data-from-nine-us-internet-companies-in-broad-secret-program/2013/06/06/3a0c0da8-cebf-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html [2]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/prism-collection-documents/ [3]: http://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/191-press-releases-2013/869-dni-statement-on-activities-authorized-under-section-702-of-fisa [4]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/06/06/nsa-chief-two-weeks-ago-were-the-only-ones-not-spying-on-the-american-people/

    I don’t even know where to begin on this [PRISM program the NSA is running][1]. All I can say is that it is bullshit and kudos to the Washington Post for breaking the story and providing a lot of detail.

    Additional stories [here][2], [here][3], and [here][4].

    [1]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-data-from-nine-us-internet-companies-in-broad-secret-program/2013/06/06/3a0c0da8-cebf-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html
    [2]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/prism-collection-documents/
    [3]: http://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/191-press-releases-2013/869-dni-statement-on-activities-authorized-under-section-702-of-fisa
    [4]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/06/06/nsa-chief-two-weeks-ago-were-the-only-ones-not-spying-on-the-american-people/

  • Vesper Take Two

    *I originally started writing a normal Vesper review. I talked about the design, the icon that I like slightly more than I dislike it. About the features missing, about the use cases, and so on. But because I am a bit slow on this, I had the chance to read a lot of other reviews.…

    *I originally started writing a normal Vesper review. I talked about the design, the icon that I like slightly more than I dislike it. About the features missing, about the use cases, and so on. But because I am a bit slow on this, I had the chance to read a lot of other reviews. So I deleted mine and wrote this instead.*

    I’ve met John and Dave. I don’t have their phone numbers or anything, and I don’t warrant any special consideration from either — I’ve only met them briefly at that. Oh, and Brent is from the same city as me too.

    It smells of bias in here.

    Oh, and this app they have created, this beautiful gem of design (both graphic and interactive), my god they charged $4.99 for it and [I’m all about paying for things][1].

    Bias I tell you. *Bias*.

    But I’ve been struggling all day with my next sentence here.

    It’s just that I don’t know if the app is worth $4.99 and that’s tough for me to say for a few reasons.

    $4.99 is nothing to spend on a good app. It’s a trivial amount given the clear work that was put into [Vesper][2]. Trivial.

    And yet do we buy a “thought collection” app — which by the way really is an apt description no matter how pompous it sounds — for $4.99?

    It does so little, and there’s so many options. It’s not the price, it’s just how do you recommend that, how do you sell that argument to someone looking at all the options?

    There’s two arguments that I can make about this app:

    1. That this app is not worth the price. That there are other options out there that do far more for far less money. There are probably hundreds of note taking apps out there that offer data portability, syncing, and all the other options we have come to expect from a paid note taking app — options that just simply don’t exist in Vesper.

    2. Or I could argue that this app is worth every penny of the $4.99, because just look at it. Just feel it. My god man.

    I personally think both statements are true.

    Vesper is phenomenally well designed from the graphics, animation, feel, speed, and interaction. It looks and feels great. It’s a fucking Ferrari of note, no, thought collection apps.

    And yet I wouldn’t recommend people buy it for the same reason I rarely recommend or argue that people buy a Mac in 2004, an M5 at any time, or an iPhone in 2006.

    Either the design is compelling you to use something more than you otherwise would, or you buy Windows/Kia/Android. That’s not a knock against other companies, it’s a statement of fact about human psychology. You either are compelled to use things you love because of practicality or because of the way they make you feel.

    Vesper is not a practical app for a multitude of reasons.

    Personally I’ll go out of my way to use things more if I love the way I feel, they feel, when I use them. It’s why people drive an M5 when a Toyota Corolla would do the job better 60% (ok 90%) of the time.

    I don’t know or care what the future holds for Vesper because I just enjoy the app. You’ll find better options for $5, of that I won’t argue, because I’d rather just enjoy the app I pissed $5 away on.

    [1]: https://brooksreview.net/2011/03/fragility-free/
    [2]: http://vesperapp.co

  • Keyboard Maestro, Markdown Links, and Ulysses III

    For a very long time now I have had a [simple Keyboard Maestro macro](https://brooksreview.net/2011/03/mad-links-km/) that would take the link on my clipboard and make a Markdown link out of any editable text that I have selected. It’s been a huge help to me over the years for formatting my writing. With my [recent switch to…

    For a very long time now I have had a [simple Keyboard Maestro macro](https://brooksreview.net/2011/03/mad-links-km/) that would take the link on my clipboard and make a Markdown link out of any editable text that I have selected. It’s been a huge help to me over the years for formatting my writing.

    With my [recent switch to Ulysses III](https://brooksreview.net/2013/04/ulysses-iii/) as my all-things-everyday-writing-app the macro no longer worked. Well, it worked about 60% of the time. Ulysses is a bit *too* helpful when you go to create a link, popping up a dialog prompting you to enter the URL once you put brackets around your text.


    So I tweaked my Keyboard Maestro macro specifically for Ulysses to solve this problem. Before I show it to you, I do want to note that it is not as instantaneous as before, so wait a beat after using it so that you don’t get things all messed up.

  • ‘TSA Drops Plan to Allow Airline Passengers to Carry Small Knives, Bats, Golf Clubs on Planes’

    [Speaking of][1] fucking bullshit, [here’s another one][2]: > The Transportation Security Administration is abandoning a plan to allow passengers to carry small knives, souvenir bats, golf clubs and other sports equipment onto planes in the face of fierce congressional and industry opposition, the head of the agency said Wednesday. The reasoning is just absurd. Here’s…

    [Speaking of][1] fucking bullshit, [here’s another one][2]:

    > The Transportation Security Administration is abandoning a plan to allow passengers to carry small knives, souvenir bats, golf clubs and other sports equipment onto planes in the face of fierce congressional and industry opposition, the head of the agency said Wednesday.

    The reasoning is just absurd. Here’s the reason Pistole said they were making the move:

    > He said intercepting them takes time that would be better used searching for explosives and other more serious threats. TSA screeners confiscate over 2,000 of the small folding knives a day from passengers.

    Basically the argument for loosening the rules is that these items pose no real security threat and take away time that could be better spent looking for real threats. So in his backtracking Pistole naturally said:

    > By scuttling the plan to drop the knives and sports equipment from TSA’s list of prohibited items, the agency can focus its attention on other priorities, including expanding its Pre-Check program to identify ahead of time travelers who don’t pose a security risk, TSA Administrator John Pistole told The Associated Press.

    So they *were* going to loosen the rules to better focus on security, but *now* they will not loosen the rules so that they can better focus on — wait for it — security. Huh?

    *Morons.*

    I also saw that 145 jackass congressmen/women wasted their time writing a letter in opposition of loosening the rules, instead of fixing things like the economy. [Here’s their letter][3] if you are interested in shaming any of them (two jackasses even signed in green ink, granted their last names are Green, but be original people).

    [1]: https://brooksreview.net/2013/06/nsa-collecting-phone-records-of-millions-of-verizon-customers-daily/
    [2]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/government-drops-plan-to-allow-passengers-to-carry-small-knives-bats-golf-clubs-on-airplanes/2013/06/05/a494a448-ce0e-11e2-8573-3baeea6a2647_story.html
    [3]: http://noknivesonplanes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/5.22.13_TSA_No-Knives-on-Planes.pdf

  • ‘NSA Collecting Phone Records of Millions of Verizon Customers Daily’

    The headline [pretty much says it all][1], but here’s Glenn Greenwald’s report: > The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing. And: > Under the terms…

    The headline [pretty much says it all][1], but here’s Glenn Greenwald’s report:

    > The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

    And:

    > Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

    The New York Times covers it a bit differently, with [Charlie Savage and Edward Wyatt reporting][2]:

    > The Obama administration is secretly carrying out a domestic surveillance program under which it is collecting business communications records involving Americans under a hotly debated section of the [Patriot Act][3], according to a [highly classified court order][4] disclosed on Wednesday night.

    The key difference between the two reports is that it sounds like The New York times believes the records to be only “business” in nature — those from a specific business subsidiary of Verizon — whereas The Gaurdian report seems to be claiming that there is a “business provision” in the Patriot Act which is being used to get all-ish records Verizon. That’s my reading at least.

    Either way, it’s fucking bullshit.

    [1]: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order
    [2]: %20http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/us/us-secretly-collecting-logs-of-business-calls.html?hp
    [3]: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/usa_patriot_act/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier
    [4]: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order

  • Why Paywalls and Big Media Don’t Work as Well as a Reasonable Person Might Assume that they Should Work

    Today the Washington Post [announced][1] that they will put up a Paywall. Of course [this][2] interests me, but not as a point of vindication — because I think the Washington Post will likely fail in their paywall foray. The problem with paywalls and big media is that big media lacks compelling content. The majority of…

    Today the Washington Post [announced][1] that they will put up a Paywall. Of course [this][2] interests me, but not as a point of vindication — because I think the Washington Post will likely fail in their paywall foray.

    The problem with paywalls and big media is that big media lacks compelling content. The majority of the content I find on the Washington Post is also content that I could find, like or, better versions of on another site for free. This is the paywall problem.

    A paywall only works if the content that exists behind the paywall, *only* exists behind the paywall.

    This is the core issue with any site that does a paywall, including this site. If all I continued to do when I put up the paywall was link to articles that every other tech blogger was linking to, adding only my own particular brand of snark — well in that scenario you have something that’s not really worth paying for. You can get those *same* links and *similar* snark from another ad-supported site — screw paying *this guy*.

    That’s the issue that faces The Washington Post.

    With the model as the Post described it, they must be outputting more than twenty compelling articles each month (first twenty articles are free) — and those articles that exist beyond the twenty must also be *worth* paying for. Because a good article is not something many are willing to pay for, your writing needs to then be so great, or so unique, that all of a sudden it *is* worth paying for.

    Essentially, news is out, and opinion is in. That means it’s not just twenty good news articles, it’s specifically *more than twenty good opinion* articles that need to be produced at the highest levels of “interestingness” before you can get people to pay. And I’m sorry, but I just don’t think the Washington Post can do it.

    That’s a huge wall to scale for the Post and a huge ask of their readership. When what you mostly write about can be found on just about any other news site people have a hard time paying for that content.

    [1]: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/washington-post-to-phase-in-a-paid-online-subscription-model/2013/06/05/d2e1bce4-cdd4-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/members/

  • Eavesdropping

    [Bruce Schneier writing about the new backdoors that the FBI wants installed][1]: > The FBI believes it can have it both ways: that it can open systems to its eavesdropping, but keep them secure from anyone else’s eavesdropping. That’s just not possible. It’s impossible to build a communications system that allows the FBI surreptitious access…

    [Bruce Schneier writing about the new backdoors that the FBI wants installed][1]:

    > The FBI believes it can have it both ways: that it can open systems to its eavesdropping, but keep them secure from anyone else’s eavesdropping. That’s just not possible. It’s impossible to build a communications system that allows the FBI surreptitious access but doesn’t allow similar access by others. When it comes to security, we have two options: We can build our systems to be as secure as possible from eavesdropping, or we can deliberately weaken their security. We have to choose one or the other.

    A really good overview of the problems that surround eavesdropping via backdoors in software.

    [1]: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/the_problems_wi_3.html

  • Mac mini Server

    When I saw a deal offered by Macminicolo.net on *[Daring Fireball][1]*, I was interested. Then I found out the cost of entry could be reduced even further by “renting” a Mac mini instead of buying one. *Sold*. I went into this adventure with Macminicolo.net having never used a Mac server before, and in just a…

    When I saw a deal offered by Macminicolo.net on *[Daring Fireball][1]*, I was interested. Then I found out the cost of entry could be reduced even further by “renting” a Mac mini instead of buying one.

    *Sold*.

    I went into this adventure with Macminicolo.net having never used a Mac server before, and in just a night I had the following up and running:

    1. Hosting for Benbrooks.me
    2. Email for Benbrooks.me (Or so I thought. Turns out I was only half way there)
    3. A VPN to route all internet traffic through.

    Granted I found guides all over the web that were easy to find and fairly easy to follow.

    More advanced things required some guidance, which luckily was also readily available.

    At this point I decided that I wanted to try and port the hosting for Brooksreview.net over to the mini (Spoiler: that’s what is serving the site now.) and so I started following guides to get WordPress up and running. I found out that you don’t need MAMP, just MySQL installed — one less app running, but then I got a bit, well, *nervous*.

    Yes, I had an instance of WordPress up and running, but I suck at managing databases and I was worried about messing up the migration — especially losing my Mint stats… *again*.

    So I hired Rusty Ross to give me a hand getting everything else setup. And I’m glad I did because there are so many disastrous pitfalls that I would have tripped into had I not hired Rusty. [You should hire him][2].

    ## The Advantage

    There’s no practical reason I can think of to move from one of the many lower cost options to a Mac mini if all you want to do is to host some email and a website or four.

    The advantage to having the Mac mini is that I have a lot of control and a lot of flexibility.

    I can do the typical Mac server things like running Mail.app and having rules set up. Or running Torrents, or what have you. There’s a lot of things that I can do.

    What I am doing right now is:

    – [VPN][3] for use when I am not on a trusted network.
    – Running Mail.app so that my rules work all the time.
    – Synchronizing OmniFocus (which is a way faster solution).
    – Using the Transmission web interface should I need to download a Torrent.
    – Hosting all of my websites.
    – Hosting all of my email.
    – Using Scrup as my own personal Cloud.app.
    – Storing all of my Dropbox on it, while using Selective Sync on my Mac. (OwnCloud is great, but no apps support it, so there is limited iOS utility right now.)
    – Using BitTorrent sync for work files.

    I’ve only [scratched the surface][4] of what I can do. There are a lot more automated tasks that I will push to the mini in future.

    This little mini is really fantastic; fast to work with, and overall a better performing, more cost effective solution for my needs.

    [Go get one][5].

    [1]: http://daringfireball.net
    [2]: https://twitter.com/ConsultantRR
    [3]: http://macminicolo.net/mountainlionvpn
    [4]: http://www.farawaymac.com
    [5]: http://macminicolo.net

  • ‘Sent From Byword’

    [Shawn Blanc has a great write up on Byword 2][1]. I’ve actually been waiting to read his thoughts, since I know how much he loves and uses Byword. The ability to publish directly to your site from Byword is nothing short of a fantastic addition — I look forward to seeing how this develops. [1]:…

    [Shawn Blanc has a great write up on Byword 2][1]. I’ve actually been waiting to read his thoughts, since I know how much he loves and uses Byword.

    The ability to publish directly to your site from Byword is nothing short of a fantastic addition — I look forward to seeing how this develops.

    [1]: http://shawnblanc.net/2013/06/sent-from-byword/

  • The Banality of ‘Don’t Be Evil’

    [Julian Assange, reviewing Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen’s new book, *The New Digital Age*][1]: > The section on “repressive autocracies” describes, disapprovingly, various repressive surveillance measures: legislation to insert back doors into software to enable spying on citizens, monitoring of social networks and the collection of intelligence on entire populations. All of these are already…

    [Julian Assange, reviewing Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen’s new book, *The New Digital Age*][1]:

    > The section on “repressive autocracies” describes, disapprovingly, various repressive surveillance measures: legislation to insert back doors into software to enable spying on citizens, monitoring of social networks and the collection of intelligence on entire populations. All of these are already in widespread use in the United States. In fact, some of those measures — like the push to require every social-network profile to be linked to a real name — were spearheaded by Google itself.

    I almost always don’t like Assange, but the enemy of my enemy… Or something like that. In his review Assange brings up some fantastic points, like the one quoted above and this gem:

    > If you want a vision of the future, imagine Washington-backed Google Glasses strapped onto vacant human faces — forever.

    Gives me the heebie-jeebies.

    {via *[Daring Fireball][2]*}

    [1]: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/opinion/sunday/the-banality-of-googles-dont-be-evil.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
    [2]: http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/06/03/assange-schmidt

  • Byword For iOS 2.0

    Today Byword 2.0 for iOS was released, and though I am not a Byword user it has one major new feature that makes the app a serious contender for my usage: publishing. Available as a $4.99 in-app purchase you can now publish directly to places like Tumblr and WordPress. This is a great addition and…

    Today Byword 2.0 for iOS was released, and though I am not a Byword user it has one major new feature that makes the app a serious contender for my usage: publishing. Available as a $4.99 in-app purchase you can now publish directly to places like Tumblr and WordPress.

    This is a great addition and something I very much hope more apps start to support.

    **Update**: I missed this at first, but the Mac app got the same publishing treatment. Very nice.

  • Quote of the Day: Marco Arment

    “It’s simply not worth it for this iOS developer to waste any time on an Android port. Your mileage may vary.” — Marco Arment

    “It’s simply not worth it for this iOS developer to waste any time on an Android port. Your mileage may vary.”
  • Felix for App.net (iPad Edition)

    I’ve been testing [Felix for iPad][1] for a while now and my biggest complaint is that the developer made me choose between putting it on my iPad mini, or retina iPad. The iPad version is seriously good and I feel lost without it on my iPad. Felix is hands down the best App.net client out…

    I’ve been testing [Felix for iPad][1] for a while now and my biggest complaint is that the developer made me choose between putting it on my iPad mini, or retina iPad. The iPad version is seriously good and I feel lost without it on my iPad.

    Felix is hands down the best App.net client out there. [Buy the iPad version][2].

    *(I hear a rumor the [iPhone version][3] might be free for a few hours.)*

    [1]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/felix-for-app.net-ipad-edition/id653222239?ls=1&mt=8
    [2]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/felix-for-app.net-ipad-edition/id653222239?ls=1&mt=8
    [3]: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/felix-for-app.net/id562447652?ls=1&mt=8

  • For the Love of the Drive

    [Brian Merchant argues that cars][1], or driving, is dying in part because of communities that allow people to move about without their own cars and he also clues into social networking like Facebook. The argument being that “we” wanted cars so that “we” could connect and talk to others and now “we” don’t need cars…

    [Brian Merchant argues that cars][1], or driving, is dying in part because of communities that allow people to move about without their own cars and he also clues into social networking like Facebook. The argument being that “we” wanted cars so that “we” could connect and talk to others and now “we” don’t need cars for this because of Facebook and the like.

    Thus kids are less interested in cars and driving, and the rest of the world is starting to follow suit in that thinking too.

    And so cars are dead, long live cars.

    I don’t entirely disagree with the notion that the automobile is losing its prestige in America, but I think there is something more to consider/blame than just urban planning and social networking.

    Merchant is mostly looking at cars only as a means to an end: Owning and driving a car is for transportation and nothing else.

    That’s a rather short-sighted view because driving a car is an experience. Or rather it *used* to be. Now the driving experience is consumed by:

    – GPS systems instructing you.
    – Phones ringing.
    – DVD players rolling.
    – iPods jamming.
    – Subwoofers.
    – 18 cup-holders.
    – McDonald’s double cheeseburgers. ((The best item on the menu, clearly.))

    Driving, even when I was a kid, was a challenge. Your car gave you feedback, you felt the road, you got lost, you were on your own. Traction control wasn’t standard, GPS was just becoming available, and few people had cell phones.

    Modern cars have effectively eliminated all of these challenges in one fell swoop. Phones never allow you to get lost or disconnected. Entertainment systems never let your mind relax. Modern suspension, steering, tires, and engines remove the sound and feeling of the car — and people rarely lose control.

    You never get lost driving any more, and you never actually *do* the driving — you just control a *thing* which happens to be propelling itself down the road. This is what we now call driving.

    Now the driver is so disconnected from the experience of driving, that they are more of an operator. That is: driving is not a skill anymore, as much as a mechanical thing that anyone can be taught.

    I think this is important to note when talking about driving and cars in America. We used to be a society that loved to drive, not for the utility of transportation, but because we loved the feel and experience that driving gave us.

    Right or wrong, technology has slowly eaten away at that experience and taken all of the challenges out of it. And while that has made driving safer and no doubt more reliable — it has also made driving a whole lot less interesting.

    I’ve mentioned before that our family car is a Dodge Journey. Which is neither a great car, nor a bad car. It’s just a car. I drove it as our only car for 6 months and it was boring. I didn’t like driving any more, it was just a necessity.

    So when we needed to get a second car for me to drive for work I immediately started looking at the oldest cars possible that I thought my wife would sign off on. I was close to acquiring a 1988 BMW M5 — a sedan that might just be one of the most interesting and pure driver’s cars out there. So simple in its beauty and operation that a BMW guy can’t help but lust for it.

    Instead I settled on a 2002 BMW M5 because I knew I would get far less grief from my wife should it run into a mechanical problem. The E39 M5 is really the last true driver’s M5 in this man’s opinion. While the newer M5’s are simply amazing cars, they also do a lot of things *for* you. ((That’s not to say I don’t like them — I love them and they are awesome to drive — but they aren’t mechanical enough to make you feel that you are one with the machine.)) With one button in the E39 I can effectively take away the modern safety controls and try my best to harness 400HP on the wet roads of Washington — not safe, but making your palms sweat a bit is living.

    I love driving again.

    I don’t think driving is dying among today’s youth because of suburban planning or Facebook — I think it’s dying because we as a society have effectively neutered the visceral experience of driving.

    We’ve made driving too easy and too automatic.

    There’s no risk, no drama, just the boring result of arriving at your destination on time.

    While the decline in driving is undoubtedly good for the environment, it’s also sad to watch something that so defines your country become a misunderstood hobbyist activity.

    [1]: http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/facebook-and-brooklyn-are-killing-the-car

  • Radiator Whiskey – Brooks Review Meetup (Update)

    We will be meeting at [Radiator Whiskey in downtown Seattle][1] (near Pike Place Market). For the rest of the details [see this post][2]. Bring whoever, but the bar space is limited. I look like the picture on the [Colophon][3] so come up and say hi when you get there. [1]: http://www.yelp.com/biz/radiator-whiskey-seattle [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2013/04/hi-there/ [3]: https://brooksreview.net/colophon/

    We will be meeting at [Radiator Whiskey in downtown Seattle][1] (near Pike Place Market). For the rest of the details [see this post][2].

    Bring whoever, but the bar space is limited. I look like the picture on the [Colophon][3] so come up and say hi when you get there.

    [1]: http://www.yelp.com/biz/radiator-whiskey-seattle
    [2]: https://brooksreview.net/2013/04/hi-there/
    [3]: https://brooksreview.net/colophon/

  • Quote of the Day: Dustin Curtis

    “In the presence of someone wearing Glass, you can never have privacy.” — Dustin Curtis

    “In the presence of someone wearing Glass, you can never have privacy.”