>Ben and Shawn share their favorite tips, tricks, and workflows for OmniFocus.
Fun show, let us know if we missed your favorite OmniFocus tip/trick.
Author: Ben Brooks
-
The Magazine
Marco Arment on his new business, *The Magazine*:
> Many publications focus on reviews and comparisons, or bring you as much news as quickly as possible. The Magazine will not serve those roles. Instead, it takes a measured approach to the big picture: rather than telling readers everything that happens in technology, The Magazine delivers meaningful editorial and big-picture articles.
I’ve known about this for a bit now, but only saw the finished app yesterday. It’s simply fantastic, everything I would put in an iPad magazine is there. I can’t think of a single reason not to get the free trial to see just how good this will be and already is.
Something that Marco didn’t say, but that I will, is that Marco is the type of guy that *will* deny your article if he doesn’t think it is good enough. Plain and simple. That is what it takes to pull something like this off: calling it like you see it, focusing on only the best, putting the reader first.
**Update:** Since everyone else is mentioning it, I will be in an upcoming issue and I am honored.
-
Tim Bray Wants Off OS X, OK
Tim Bray, complaining about the direction Apple is taking OS X:
> In Particular · Since Snow Leopard, there’s been exactly one useful new OS X thing: windows you can resize at any edge. And there have been brutal amputations (most painful for me: loss of the Apache GUI and the moronic refusal to tell me what screen resolutions I’m using).
One new feature?
+ iCloud
+ VIP email inbox
+ Omnibar in Safari
+ How about just the overall stability of Safari
+ Fullscreen appsI’ll stop. What Bray is really upset about, from what I can infer, two things:
1. The new features are obfuscating the nerd parts of the OS. Like the screen size resolutions Bray complains about, these changes are vastly more useful to non-geeks and should be irrelevant to geeks since there are plenty of tools that can hep mitigate this that are asily found using any search engine, even Google.
2. I think the biggest problem Bray is having is one that plagues a lot of people. Which is, unless you buy fully into the Apple environment you get limited benefit from new OS updates. So if you use an Android phone, iCloud is irrelevant to you. Likewise if you don’t use Safari the massive strides there won’t effect you. And so on. This is typical of Apple, you need to fully “buy in” to the Apple environment or you risk wondering why in the hell you keep upgrading.Bray won’t be better of on Ubuntu, most people aren’t. I tried doing that same thing a few times now, because it sounds so appealing to the inner geek in me: more trouble than it’s worth and I could never fully be just Linux.
Bray’s points are valid, but not a fault of OS X. Rather they are the fault of the user only wanting to have one foot in the door of an ecosystem that requires you to dive in head first.
-
Blanc’s Hidden Radio
Shawn Blanc:
>The Jambox is certainly not as clever as the Hidden Radio. Nor is it as complementary to the decor of its surroundings.
Oh, I think we know where this is going…
Shawn mentions that the Hidden looks better and has better battery life, neither of which matter after you have smashed it with a sledge hammer out of frustration. Hidden sent out a Kickstarter survey and typically I ignore these, but I felt compelled to let them know how and where they failed in my eyes.
Contrary to what Shawn says, I think the Jambox looks far better. It’s less clever, and has shorter battery life, but then again it works — so there’s that.
I’ve had a Jambox for what seems like decades and I barely use it, every time I go to use it I find the battery dead. Yet I like it better.
The Hidden could have won me over if the battery lasted a month when off and it could play for an hour straight. Not much else matters, and that’s where it failed for me. Truly, it didn’t even have to sound that great.
-
Opt-out of Verizon Marketing Bullshit
As [pointed out to me on App.net](https://alpha.app.net/bryanjclark/post/843872), you have less than 30 days to opt-out of some Verizon marketing sharing program. Who knows what it is other than a privacy violation in exchange for a few bucks going to Verizon.
You have to sign into your Verizon account and say no to three things. Pretty simple, go do it, then photo copy your middle finger and send it to Verizon.
-
‘Without Keyboards’
Interesting thoughts from Craig Grannell on a TechCrunch post about the future of writing in a keyboard-less world. One thing that grabbed me was this sentence from Grannell:
>Like with every other creative medium, it’s the edit that’s so often important with the written (or spoken) word.
Like most people, I talk differently that I write. To be specific: when I talk I formulate my thoughts on the fly, but when I type I am forced to think about what I ultimately want to say and how to get there. So the idea of dictating to my Mac was never something that I wanted, it certainly is something nice to have, but I never use it.
However, on my iPhone, I seek out the dictation. It is simply much easier to dictate on my iPhone than it is to tap things out with my thumbs. Because of that, I tend to steer clear of my iPhone for anything long form.
Which brings me to software keyboards and my odd love and fascination with them. Specifically the iPad software keyboard. Because of the, shall we say, clunkiness of typing on the iPad’s software keyboard I have found that you must type a bit slower to be more accurate (editing is a pain). And because of the slower rate of typing, I find that I transcribe my thoughts a bit more clearly.
This, I think, is why I like using the iPad so much — having nothing to do with the one-app-at-a-time viewports — instead more accurately getting my thoughts out of my head. Ideally, then, I would love to have a writing device that is the iPad, but with width to accommodate a full-sized software keyboard — I may be the only one who wants such a device though.
-
Quote of the Day: Jonathan Poritsky
“‘Exclusive’ is a way to dupe readers into taking you seriously, into believing that yours is the only page upon which they can devour the freshest and the latest. But that’s a lie. It always has been.” -
CDMA versus GSM Call Quality
In the thoughts I wrote up about the iPhone 5, I had mentioned that the call quality seemed worse to me on Verizon. [I said](https://brooksreview.net/2012/09/iphone-5-2/):
>Call audio quality seems worse when you are in an area with low reception, worse than with the previous iPhone. What I suspect is that this is a difference between AT&T and Verizon and not a difference in the iPhone itself, but I cannot be sure.
I received a long and detailed email from a reader, who wished not to be named or the email shared, that pointed me in the direction of looking at CDMA versus GSM technologies. The hint that I was given was the CDMA doesn’t limit the users a cell tower can receive, instead CDMA drops the bandwidth to each person to accommodate the traffic, whereas GSM limits the users and fixes the bandwidth each user can have. That made a ton of sense, so I did some digging to see what in the world is actually happening. I started with LTE and found this note on the [LTE Wikipedia page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_(telecommunication)) under voice calling:
>While the industry has seemingly standardized on VoLTE for the future, the demand for voice calls today has led LTE carriers to introduce CSFB as a stopgap measure. When placing or receiving a voice call, LTE handsets will fall back to old 2G or 3G networks for the duration of the call.
So from everything I could gather, in a lot of cases, Verizon calls are dumping back to the CDMA networks. Ok, so what can we unearth about CDMA. [Again, Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cdma#Advantages_of_asynchronous_CDMA_over_other_techniques):
>There is no strict limit to the number of users that can be supported in an asynchronous CDMA system, only a practical limit governed by the desired bit error probability, since the SIR (Signal to Interference Ratio) varies inversely with the number of users. In a bursty traffic environment like mobile telephony, the advantage afforded by asynchronous CDMA is that the performance (bit error rate) is allowed to fluctuate randomly, with an average value determined by the number of users times the percentage of utilization. […]
>In other words, asynchronous CDMA is ideally suited to a mobile network where large numbers of transmitters each generate a relatively small amount of traffic at irregular intervals. CDM (synchronous CDMA), TDMA, and FDMA systems cannot recover the underutilized resources inherent to bursty traffic due to the fixed number of orthogonal codes, time slots or frequency channels that can be assigned to individual transmitters.This is why at sporting events your AT&T service goes tits up while Verizon users can still actually use their devices — albeit damned slowly. Basically, the anonymous emailer was correct, CDMA is one big shared pipe with a finite amount of resources and no cap on the users.
Now, I tried to verify the claim the GSM does not act this way, but couldn’t find any kind of resource. I did however [come across this page, titled](http://www.nordicgroup.us/ssub/voicequal.htm): “Voice Quality CDMA versus GSM”. The page seems to confirm that CDMA quality will degrade with the more simultaneous users on it, but that overall call quality is in parity between the two networks. ((Full LTE voice calling should be way better sounding.))
So what I have learned is: “call quality” is a dodgy bugger. All things being equal the two standards should have relatively equal “call quality”. However, if CDMA gets congested, the call quality will drop. Whereas if GSM gets congested, you just won’t be able to make a call — roughly speaking.
There’s obvious advantages to both. If you know more, please share.
-
One Device
John Moltz:
>My point is that I have yet to see anyone prove that you can get one device to do it all by either scaling up from a mobile operating system or down from a desktop operating system.Fantastic point. Moreover I think this explains why I am not one of those people that can use an iPad exclusively. Wait, I mean, I *could* use only an iPad, but I *chose* not to. And I have been wondering why lately, especially given how much I actually love my iPad and *like* the idea of using it more and more.
That’s the thing though, because the iPad is fantastic at somethings and I *will* go out of my way to use it for those things. However, I don’t like going out of my way to use it for things that I already own gadgets that do that thing better. I’m not wanting to make calls on my iPad, or edit photos on it — but I always want to use Instapaper on it.
I am guessing the solution is what I am only just not getting a taste of with iCloud. That behind-the-scenes-sync that just puts the data where I need it, when I need it. Moving from iA’s Writer across my devices truly is seamless for me — to me that’s far better and more productive that just having one device that does it all.
-
‘The 5 Most Common Ways Laptops Are Stolen’
The Prey blog lists out 5 spots your laptop is likely to be stolen from — you should feel safer if you have Prey installed, you have it installed right? Two things that caught my eye:
1. They note that your office is a likely target. I’ve thought a lot about this and often our office is pretty open and I leave for hours with my laptop sitting where anyone could grab it and dash out. In the past I put locks on my laptops, but for a while now I haven’t had a laptop with a spot to lock it, this seems like a flaw with Apple products to me. Prey and Find my Mac are great, but they are reactive measures not proactive measures. Honestly now that I think about it, I think I will just take my laptop with me.
2. I like the note that a fancy case attracts people to the device. It’s interesting, because as Mac geeks we like to enclose our expensive computers in expensive/nice cases. I know I won’t stop doing it, but I certainly will think twice about feeling safe leaving it in plain sight in my car, or elsewhere.All-in-all, good reminders.
-
‘You Should Buy a Bidet’
Lex Friedman making the most compelling argument for a Bidet I have every read:
>Let’s start with a thought experiment. Suppose you’re calmly walking down the street, minding your own business as you do, when a crazed attacker smears his feces all over your forehead.The bottom line is what are you going to rely on to clean your face: toilet paper or water?
Yeah, water. I don’t mean to say I am going out and getting a bidet, but I am certainly thinking about it now. Especially one of those Japanese ones with the seat warmer — nothing nicer on a cold morning.
-
The B&B Podcast #79: You Never Need It, Until You Need It
>Shawn and Ben talk about Ben’s reluctance to use his iPad as a work device even though he says he wants to, our impressions of the Kickstarted Hidden Radio Bluetooth speaker, Shawn’s initial impressions of the new Kindle Paperwhite, and more.
-
‘An App, or Not’
Roger Black in a long and excellent post about The New York Times and their media strategy, makes this compelling observation:
>Frequency and currency trump perspective and background on the web. It’s more a matter of “this just in” than “you gotta read this article.”
That not only describes The Times, it describes almost every blog I visit. I don’t want that to *ever* describe this blog. From time to time it may, but I strive for “you gotta read this article”. When I stop to think about all the “old media” publications, there are only two that I think are currently publishing the type of “you gotta read this” content:
– The New Yorker
– Vanity FairOne of those two you would expect…
-
Quote of the Day: John Moltz
“To expect them to do it again in the year since Jobs’ passing is unrealistic at best, self-indulgent claptrap at worst.” -
‘Twitter Breaks Its Own New Rules With TweetDeck’
Kris Holt on how Twitter’s own Tweetdeck breaks the rules Twitter set forth on displaying tweets:
>The rules put Twitter in a tough spot, it would seem. Either it keeps Facebook integration in TweetDeck, risking the ire of developers who might accuse it of not playing fair, or it removes the Facebook feature and faces possible blowback from TweetDeck users who find it useful.The choice Twitter makes here is going to be fascinating to see. The only “right” thing to do is to remove the Facebook integration — and they very well may do that — but I highly doubt they do that. Instead, Twitter will ignore this and just go about business as screwing-over-developers-normal.
[via Jonathan Poritsky] -
Amazon Item of the Week: Griffin Technology PowerMate
Not a new product by any means, I lost the first one I owned and ended up ordering another — simply because I wanted to test out a theory of triggering Keyboard Maestro macros with it (you can, it’s awesome).
Anyway, now I have a panic button of sorts for my Mac. I hit the big pretty silver knob and my Mac does all sorts of stuff. Fun.