Be sure to check your Mac to make sure it is not infected, because it sounds [like a lot of people are](http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2012/04/flashback-trojan-reportedly-controls-half-a-million-macs-and-counting.ars).
Top Posts
Recent Articles
-
Trojan-Downloader:OSX/Flashback.I
Be sure to check your Mac to make sure it is not infected, because it sounds [like a lot of people are](http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2012/04/flashback-trojan-reportedly-controls-half-a-million-macs-and-counting.ars).
-
Paper App
[Gabe over at Macdrifter wrote up a review](http://www.macdrifter.com/2012/04/paper-app-review-2/) of [Paper by FiftyThree](http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/paper-by-fiftythree/id506003812?mt=8) and I think this sums up his thoughts quite well: >I haven’t deleted it, but I will revisit it after updates to see if it gets any better. I found that odd because I personally think that Paper is quite good. I actually…
[Gabe over at Macdrifter wrote up a review](http://www.macdrifter.com/2012/04/paper-app-review-2/) of [Paper by FiftyThree](http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/paper-by-fiftythree/id506003812?mt=8) and I think this sums up his thoughts quite well:
>I haven’t deleted it, but I will revisit it after updates to see if it gets any better.
I found that odd because I personally think that Paper is quite good. I actually love it.
### UI / UX
Paper has one of the most cleverly intuitive and simple interfaces I have seen. If we take the app’s goal at face value — being a piece of paper — then I think it is hard to say that they have done anything but succeed. Because when you get right down to it, Paper is nothing but a sheet of blank paper. There is no UI chrome, [as John Gruber said about such design](http://daringfireball.net/linked/2012/03/29/paper):
>The tension is between simplicity and obviousness. Eliminating on-screen chrome is simpler, more elegant and beautiful.
This is the reason why I think Gabe is struggling with the app:
>However, Paper’s concerted effort to remove all chrome has created an app that makes users dumb. The drawing tools are only revealed after swiping from the bottom of the screen. This is not obvious. If a user misses the instructions at the beginning or forgets the gesture, they are left with an app that can only draw black lines.
I think though, that while confusing, there is a good argument to be made that this is exactly how such an app should work. Look, I am no fan of skeuomorphic design — and Paper is the epitome of such design — but I think it is fair to say that in this case the design is spot on with the function of the app. That isÚ Paper, works exactly like a sheet of paper, because last I checked there were no buttons for pen type, color, new page, or undo on an *actual* sheet of paper.
So while the controls may be non-obvious without instructions, they are also not hard to remember once you figure it out. Swiping up from the bottom to get pens really is not complicated or unique for an iPad user to remember. Nor is swiping for a new page, or pinching to go back.
In fact the only gesture I find cumbersome is the undo/redo action, but then again this is something that actual paper never comes with — it’s a `pro` level feature and is treated as such.
So yes, Paper is overly simplistic in the UI design, but that is actually the point of the app — it’s meant to be a sheet of paper residing in a Moleskin notebook. They succeeded at that.
### In-App Purchase
I was actually really off-put by the fact that the app was free, but to get any of the useful tools you needed to buy them via an in-app purchase. It does seem shady to me, but at the same time I doubt Paper would have seen any success at $7.99 for the app.
So for all the shadiness that IAP brings, I also think it adds a nice upgrade path for users. You get to try out a hot app for free and add on to it
$0.99$1.99 at a time at your convenience.It’s a tricky situation and while I don’t think Paper handled it perfectly, I do commend them for having a business model. I personally wish they just made the app $0.99 with IAP for additional tools — this would have set the expectation for the user that the app is not free.
### Paper
Paper isn’t the best thing ever to happen to the iPad, but it is my favorite sketching app on the iPad. So much so that it actually gave me reason to finally order a [Cosmonaut](http://www.studioneat.com/products/cosmonaut).
-
Baseball Season
I know not all of you are baseball fans ((Though I don’t know why.)) , but I wanted to share a few of my favorite baseball blogs: 1. [FanGraphs](http://www.fangraphs.com/): these guys cover all of baseball and they do a hell of a job at it. If I could only subscribe to one baseball site, this…
I know not all of you are baseball fans ((Though I don’t know why.)) , but I wanted to share a few of my favorite baseball blogs:
1. [FanGraphs](http://www.fangraphs.com/): these guys cover all of baseball and they do a hell of a job at it. If I could only subscribe to one baseball site, this would be that site.
2. [MLB Trade Rumors](http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/): One of the best parts about baseball is speculating on trades. These guys are usually first with the news.### Mariners ###
Smart readers are likely to be interested in Mariners news, here are my two favorite Mariners sites:
1. [U.S.S. Mariner](http://www.ussmariner.com/): it’s like FanGraphs, but just for Mariners fans and that makes it a winner in my book.
2. [Prospect Insider](http://prospectinsider.com): Jason A. Churchill and company do a great job at taking a more scouting centric look at the Mariners (as opposed to the saber-metric approach usually seen in USS Mariner). I have been a long time reader of this site and I still love all the information they give about up and coming prospects.Lastly: thank God it’s baseball season.
-
‘Google Begins Testing Its Augmented-Reality Glasses’
Nick Bilton on Google’s new glasses: >A video released by Google on Wednesday, which can be seen below, showed potential uses for Project Glass. A man wanders around the streets of New York City, communicating with friends, seeing maps and information, and snapping pictures. It concludes with him video-chatting with a girlfriend as the sun…
Nick Bilton on Google’s new glasses:
>A video released by Google on Wednesday, which can be seen below, showed potential uses for Project Glass. A man wanders around the streets of New York City, communicating with friends, seeing maps and information, and snapping pictures. It concludes with him video-chatting with a girlfriend as the sun sets over the city. All of this is seen through the augmented-reality glasses.I think they are missing a few ‘features’, so let me fix that (my additions in italics):
A video released by Google on Wednesday, which can be seen below, showed potential uses for Project Glass. A man wanders around the streets of New York City *seeing ads for condoms*, communicating with friends *while seeing ads for escorts*, seeing maps and information *like nearby deals, sponsored by American Express*, and snapping pictures *while being delivered ads for the products in the pictures*. It concludes with him video-chatting with a girlfriend as the sun sets over the city *and an ad for Dawn dish washing soap scrolls across his girlfriends face*. All of this is seen through the augmented-reality glasses.
Sounds fantastic, right?
>One person who had used the glasses said: “They let technology get out of your way.
Yeah, now it just — literally — sits between your eye and everything else you see. Totally out of the way.
>If I want to take a picture I don’t have to reach into my pocket and take out my phone; I just press a button at the top of the glasses and that’s it.”
Because it’s *way* too obvious when I want to snap a picture of a person’s mullet and I have to pull out my phone to do so.
Google: thinking everyone wants to wear a Star Trek visor that serves you ads all day long.
-
iPlan for iPad [iTunes Link]
Another iPad app, this time a calendar app. I just saw this last night in the top paid list in the App Store. I downloaded it and played with it. Before I go any further I need to stop and talk about the icon. It’s not hideous, but I have to wonder what in the…
Another iPad app, this time a calendar app. I just saw this last night in the top paid list in the App Store. I downloaded it and played with it.
Before I go any further I need to stop and talk about the icon. It’s not hideous, but I have to wonder what in the hell they are trying to do with it. It resembles a moleskin, but the app is a calendar app — no matter how much they try to sell it as a “planning” app. Maybe I am missing something.
Overall the app isn’t anything really special in this category, but it has a couple of things I found noteworthy:
1. The app is slow to open, but once open your data is all there and there quickly. If you flip through the month view there is no pause to load in new calendar data or jittery scrolling.
2. This is also a weather app, kind of. There is a nice current time indicator and weather symbol in the upper right corner. It just shows the current weather condition (cloudy, sunny) and the time and date. Since this app hides the status bar, these are welcomed additions in that location and I thought it clever to add a little weather status in the app.Overall I might actually use this app if they changed the icon and removed the branding and quotes from the top left. I find it minimal looking and clean, not too bad.
-
WeatherEye HD for iPad [iTunes Link]
I had not seen this free Weather app before. It’s not bad, it is free and shows a banner ad along the bottom (also no retina graphics). The reason I am linking to it though, is because I think it makes decent use of the space provided by the iPad. It’s not the best use,…
I had not seen this free Weather app before. It’s not bad, it is free and shows a banner ad along the bottom (also no retina graphics). The reason I am linking to it though, is because I think it makes decent use of the space provided by the iPad. It’s not the best use, but it doesn’t feel like the app is trying to cram information in because there is room to cram information in.
That said the banner ad is a deal breaker — not to mention the app is pretty sluggish.
(Be sure to pinch on the forecast data to move between views — nice touch.)
Again I don’t think this is a great app, but I do think it is one of the better ones — especially for a free app.
[via reader Ramanan] -
‘Instagram’s Business Model?’
Shawn Blanc: >Sara Lacy of PandoDaily asks him how Instagram plans to make money. Based on his answer it sounds like: (a) their current user-base of 30 million-ish people is not yet big enough to start monetizing the service; and (b) their plan is to build a tool that advertisers can use so they don’t…
Shawn Blanc:
>Sara Lacy of PandoDaily asks him how Instagram plans to make money. Based on his answer it sounds like: (a) their current user-base of 30 million-ish people is not yet big enough to start monetizing the service; and (b) their plan is to build a tool that advertisers can use so they don’t have to go through the “terrible experience” of using their iPhone to post an image to Instagram.*Pathetic.*
Shawn and I have talked about this stuff a lot on our podcast, but the bottom line is this: charge for your app. If you follow that advice you may grow slower, but you will grow with a business model that won’t leave you scrambling later.
-
Amazon Item of the Week: Surefire Fury P2X-B-BK
I know that I linked to the Surefire 6PX-Pro not to long ago, but I just found this model when I needed a second Surefire — and man is it great. It’s a dual stage LED that outputs 15 lumens on the low end and 500 lumens on the high end (the aforementioned 6PX-Pro tops…
I know that I linked to the Surefire 6PX-Pro not to long ago, but I just found this model when I needed a second Surefire — and man is it great. It’s a dual stage LED that outputs 15 lumens on the low end and 500 lumens on the high end (the aforementioned 6PX-Pro tops out at 200 lumens).
It’s really bright — like amazingly so.
It is just a touch bigger than the 6PX and yet it is over twice as much the output. Really amazing.
-
Apple Marketing
I can’t be the only one that thinks the 18th picture down (sorry I can’t link to just that spot) would make for a great Apple print ad — just put a little Apple logo in the bottom right and crop out the cameraman. [via Marcelo Somers] UPDATE: [Marcelo took the liberty of creating the…
I can’t be the only one that thinks the 18th picture down (sorry I can’t link to just that spot) would make for a great Apple print ad — just put a little Apple logo in the bottom right and crop out the cameraman.
[via Marcelo Somers]UPDATE: [Marcelo took the liberty of creating the ad](http://behindcompanies.com/2012/04/don-draper-think-different/). I think it would make for a great full page ad in, say, The New York Times.
-
‘Apple Holds the Master Decryption Key When It Comes to iCloud Security, Privacy’
Chris Foresman: >Ultimately, iCloud security is a matter of trust between individual users and Apple. As confirmed by industry experts, Apple takes a number of precautions to prevent unauthorized access to user data by third parties, but those precautions don’t secure your data from Apple itself. If you require—or simply want—greater assurance than that, turn…
Chris Foresman:
>Ultimately, iCloud security is a matter of trust between individual users and Apple. As confirmed by industry experts, Apple takes a number of precautions to prevent unauthorized access to user data by third parties, but those precautions don’t secure your data from Apple itself. If you require—or simply want—greater assurance than that, turn off whatever iCloud features you don’t need.I am really paranoid about privacy issues, but I think the above from Foresman is really an astute observation. No matter the security in place, I simply do not trust Google. The same is not true of Apple, for now.
-
‘One-Third of U.S. High School Students Now Own an iPhone’
Eric Slivka: >Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster today issued a report on his firm’s latest semi-annual survey of U.S. teenagers, the 23rd such survey in the firm’s history. The results of the extensive survey of 5,600 U.S. high school students show that 34% of surveyed students now own an iPhone, an all-time high in the…
Eric Slivka:
>Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster today issued a report on his firm’s latest semi-annual survey of U.S. teenagers, the 23rd such survey in the firm’s history. The results of the extensive survey of 5,600 U.S. high school students show that 34% of surveyed students now own an iPhone, an all-time high in the survey and double the percentage seen just a year ago. Furthermore, 40% of surveyed students indicated that they intend to purchase an iPhone within the next six months.I’m surprised it’s that low, [but I do recall this statement from Martin Fichter, the acting president of HTC America, on September 12, 2011](http://www.geekwire.com/2011/htc-boss-windows-phone-7-patents-iphones-cool-anymore/):
>I brought my daughter back to college — she’s down in Portland at Reed — and I talked to a few of the kids on her floor. And none of them has an iPhone because they told me: ‘My dad has an iPhone.’ There’s an interesting thing that’s going on in the market. The iPhone becomes a little less cool than it was. They were carrying HTCs. They were carrying Samsungs. They were even carrying some Chinese manufacture’s devices. If you look at a college campus, Mac Book Airs are cool. iPhones are not that cool anymore. We here are using iPhones, but our kids don’t find them that cool anymore.
So, either:
– The remaining 66% are using these other smartphones;
– Or a major shift happens where kids dump their iPhones when they get to college;
– Or Fichter was pulling data out of his ass.Also of note, the iPad ownership:
>On the tablet front, an identical 34% of students report owning some sort of tablet device, with 70% of those indicating that they have an iPad.
So of those kids that have a tablet, 70% have an iPad. That’s insane.
-
‘RIM Evolves Its Server Software to Manage iPhones, Android Devices’
Ina Fried: >Acknowledging it is no longer a BlackBerry-only world, Research In Motion on Tuesday released the first version of its server software to manage other company’s mobile devices. >The update to BlackBerry Mobile Fusion, as promised, can help businesses keep tabs on Android and iOS devices in addition to BlackBerry phones and PlayBook tablets.…
Ina Fried:
>Acknowledging it is no longer a BlackBerry-only world, Research In Motion on Tuesday released the first version of its server software to manage other company’s mobile devices.>The update to BlackBerry Mobile Fusion, as promised, can help businesses keep tabs on Android and iOS devices in addition to BlackBerry phones and PlayBook tablets.
[So it starts](https://brooksreview.net/2012/04/rim-ms/).
-
State of the iPad App Store: Calendar Apps
Along with Weather apps, I like to keep tabs on the current state of the art for calendar apps — I am still looking for that perfect app. Right now Agenda on the iPhone comes to [near perfection](https://brooksreview.net/2012/03/cal-redux/) for me and Fantastical/QuickCal suffice on my Mac. Here again though I am faced with very little…
Along with Weather apps, I like to keep tabs on the current state of the art for calendar apps — I am still looking for that perfect app. Right now Agenda on the iPhone comes to [near perfection](https://brooksreview.net/2012/03/cal-redux/) for me and Fantastical/QuickCal suffice on my Mac.
Here again though I am faced with very little innovation in the iPad sector. This time around the problem seems to be the abundance of screen real estate and the love of skeuomorphic design.
Before we dive into the iPad calendar apps here are a couple of primers about what I am looking for in calendars:
1. [Calendar Apps Suck, Here Are My Suggestions](https://brooksreview.net/2010/09/sucky-calendars/) – in this post I talk about what I want out of a calendar app.
2. [Calendar Redux](https://brooksreview.net/2012/03/cal-redux/) – in this post I talk about why I like Agenda and how I oscillate between Fantastical and QuickCal.### Back to the iPad
I think the biggest problem that iPad calendar developers face is with how people use the calendar on their iPad. I am going to make a very general assumption, but that assumption is that most iPad users own a smartphone and desktop/laptop computer of some type in addition to the iPad — something that I don’t think is too far off from reality.
The fact that users have multiple devices creates an interesting problem to solve on the iPad. By far the iPhone/smartphone is going to be much more readily available for checking appointments and entering new ones. The computer is also going to be far more heavily used than an iPad because people are more used to it — and because of the (generally speaking) larger screen nature of the computer, coupled with the fact that this is likely what people are sitting in front of while at work for 8 hours out of the day.
That leaves the iPad with an odd swatch of real estate to cover. The iPad needs to be both good at quickly looking up the days appointments and also great at long term planning and entering new events. In my opinion it’s almost an unfair situation for the iPad — so it’s not wonder to me that there aren’t any great calendar apps for it.
### Apple’s Offering
Apple’s built in calendar app is annoying at best and down right hideous most of the time. If you can get over the [little bits of torn paper](https://brooksreview.net/2011/04/mimics/) at the top, then you likely can’t get over the fact that it is just a rather useless port of iCal. My largest gripe here (besides the design) is that I can’t pinch to zoom at all to move from day to week to month views — or even to adjust how much of the screen the hour takes up.
Add to that the fact that the day view is a nightmare of wasted space and repetitive data, and well I can’t stand to use the app.
### The Incumbents
There has been only two calendar apps for my iPad that I thought were worth keeping around: [Agenda](http://getappsavvy.com/agenda/) and [Calvetica](http://mysterioustrousers.com/calvetica). Both are nice apps, but both don’t fill the void for me. Lacking in both utility and design.
#### Agenda
The app I love to use on my iPhone, seems to have lost its way in the port over to the iPad. My biggest gripe is that there is not one good viewport that accomplishes everything in a logical manner.
The week view is nice, but the layout is confusing. The day view has the signature scrolling list down the side, but wastes a ton of space showing just one days appointments. It’s a solid app, but it’s not a great app.
#### Calvetica
A slightly different approach than Agenda, Calvetica features a design that is more pleasing to my eye, but still feels like it is wasting too much space.
Is the best use of the screen to show a large scrolling month view? Not for me it isn’t. I do like the gestures for switching between day, agenda, and week views on the right — but I also find the app really sluggish at loading in the calendar data when scrolling through the months.
I’ve always had a soft spot for the design of Calvetica and think they have done a great job creating a quick entry system, but the fact remains that I mainly use a calendar for viewing appointments and in this case Calvetica doesn’t fit the bill for me.
### Interesting New Options
Again I dug through the App Store looking only at paid calendar apps. Of all the offerings just three caught my eye enough to download and try out because they were the only three that looked to be trying to do things a bit differently.
#### iCalendar
Not to be confused with iCal, [iCalendar](http://itunes.apple.com/app/icalendar/id492076105?mt=8) is an interesting option for one reason and one reason only: the design is a departure from the norm. iCalendar features very large type, and while that doesn’t work out too well for short appointments, it does make your data a bit more “glance-able”.
Honestly I just downloaded the app because the design caught my eye. Nothing about this app screams “new” or “different”, but if dark backgrounds are your thing, you may find the app nice (once they get a retina update out).
#### 12months
First a note about [12months](http://www.app.net/12months): no retina support here. It is a very unique app though. The entire years worth of calendar dates are listed out as little numbers. Tapping on any date shows the appointments for that date in a pop-up window. That’s it.
As far as I can tell there is no way to add an appointment, but it you can edit them. The app also only works in portrait orientation.
This is a niche app if I ever saw one. I’m not sure in what scenario this app would be useful, but I am sure it would be of interest to some. Personally I just find it odd.
#### Calendar ABW
Let me first start by saying that [Calendar ABW](http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/calendar-abw/id478605600?mt=8) is the only app of the lot that doesn’t pull in your calendar data — a nugget I learned only after plopping down the $9.99 for it. The calendar data you enter is all sandboxed in the app — making it the hardest of all the apps mentioned here to start using. That said it is also the most interesting of the apps I tried.
Your entire day is broken into one hour segments, shown four at a time. Each day is one row. When you add an event you can either have it be 30 minutes or a full hour. That’s it.
This is quite interesting, and though it doesn’t work for me, I bet it would be great if you practiced time boxing. Here’s a screen shot so you can see what I mean:
[
](http://c276381.r81.cf1.rackcdn.com/IMG_0057.PNG)It seems to be to be built as an app you reference a lot, maybe for a conference schedule — as a day-to-day calendar app I don’t find it to be that great given that it doesn’t sync with my Agenda calendars.
### State of the App Store Summary Findings
At the end of all this searching I am left with two conclusions:
1. It must be incredibly difficult to build a calendar app for the iPad, because;
2. All current calendar apps for the iPad leave a lot to be desired.For now, I’ll stick with alternating between Agenda and Calvetica.
-
‘Joey Votto’s Massive Extension Changes the Game’
Dave Cameron, writing for my favorite Baseball site FanGraphs, about the recently announced Cincinnati Reds extension of star first baseman, Joey Votto (a 12-year, $251.5 million total contract): >This deal is going to have lasting repercussions on the sport. Not only does it suggest that the Reds are going to remain competitive in the NL…
Dave Cameron, writing for my favorite Baseball site FanGraphs, about the recently announced Cincinnati Reds extension of star first baseman, Joey Votto (a 12-year, $251.5 million total contract):
>This deal is going to have lasting repercussions on the sport. Not only does it suggest that the Reds are going to remain competitive in the NL Central going forward, but it also resets the price expectations for every pre-free agent player in the sport. Congratulations, players, all of your expected prices just went up. Way up.It’s a massive contract and shows two things:
1. Players are going to be getting paid a lot more.
2. Teams expect that to make financial sense.Item number 2, that amazes me.
-
‘Being Gifted’
Jorge Quinteros: >A new camera means a new incentive, a new enthusiasm to shoot more and most likely, an immediate and substantial upgrade to whatever you might have own before but what it doesn’t mean is being gifted with any additional artistic talent to produce something you may not have been able to create with…
Jorge Quinteros:
>A new camera means a new incentive, a new enthusiasm to shoot more and most likely, an immediate and substantial upgrade to whatever you might have own before but what it doesn’t mean is being gifted with any additional artistic talent to produce something you may not have been able to create with your previous equipment.Most common question I get from writers just getting started on the web: what tools do you use? The answer is irrelevant, because having my tools won’t make you any better of a writer (probably would make you worse). What Jorge says in the above passage really rings true to me: good tools are great to have and use, but they don’t instantly make you any better at what you use those tools for.
-
10.7: Remove the Dock’s Display Delay
This has been floating around for a week or so, but I just got around to doing it — and oh man is it great.
This has been floating around for a week or so, but I just got around to doing it — and oh man is it great.
-
Seasonality Core
Just found this app this morning, a nice version of Seasonality for your Mac. I have a lot of the same complaints and accolades for it as I do the iPad version. I do like the control you have over the graph data. Seasonality’s graphs did take me a minute to figure out what they…
Just found this app this morning, a nice version of Seasonality for your Mac. I have a lot of the same complaints and accolades for it as I do the iPad version. I do like the control you have over the graph data. Seasonality’s graphs did take me a minute to figure out what they are for, so don’t feel like you are the only one if you get confused at first.
*(Also there is [Wx](http://hrtapps.com/wxmac/) that offers a far more, umm shall we say, nerdy view of weather data.)*
-
Anil Dash Calls Foul
[Anil Dash responding to criticism of Readability writes](http://dashes.com/anil/2012/04/readability-instapaper-the-network-and-the-price-we-pay.html): >But, foolish fanboy enthusiasm on both sides has got people choosing “sides” between the apps and turning legitimate feature debates into some sort of moral judgment of the people building the tools. That’s three sentences into his entire argument and he has already discredited himself (in my…
[Anil Dash responding to criticism of Readability writes](http://dashes.com/anil/2012/04/readability-instapaper-the-network-and-the-price-we-pay.html):
>But, foolish fanboy enthusiasm on both sides has got people choosing “sides” between the apps and turning legitimate feature debates into some sort of moral judgment of the people building the tools.That’s three sentences into his entire argument and he has already discredited himself (in my opinion) by dropping the term “fanboy”. But let’s see what else he has to say.
> First, I should loudly and clearly disclaim: I’m theoretically conflicted all over this. I am an enthusiastic and proud advisor to the good people at Readability and consider them friends. I am a long-time fan of Marco Arment’s from even before Instapaper was created, and whenever we’ve seen each other socially, I’ve been really impressed by his thoughtfulness.
Actually, there’s nothing “theoretical” about his conflict: Anil Dash is an advisor to Readability and therefore has a vested interest in the success of Readability. That he is a “fan” of Marco Arment is a “theoretical” conflict, but in no part is there anything “theoretical” about his bias towards Readability. There’s nothing wrong with bias — we all have it — but to pretend it only “theoretically” exists is bullshit, pure and simple.
I consider Marco a friend, and for that people have said that I only am defending Instapaper because of that friendship. I can see how people get there, but let’s go into some background on this:
1. I became friends with Marco because I love Instapaper — so my defense and love for Instapaper predates the friendship.
2. I am the loudest and biggest critic of things out there and doubly so if they are a friend. I can’t verify that, [but I am sure anyone who listens to Shawn Blanc and I talk every week can verify my critical nature](http://5by5.tv/bb).That’s my bias and I own it. I do not, however, think it comes into play with my main complaint about Readability: that they are collecting money in the names of other people, without the consent of those people. That’s not a complaint about popularity or competition — it’s a legitimate complaint about ethics behind such a model.
Back to Dash:
> And, since I’ve been through this kind of stupid fanboy battle before and know exactly what it costs, I want to explain what I think is at stake and why we’re headed down a dangerous road.
There’s that word again, a word meant to belittle the situation via negative connotation without having to provide a strong argument why. This is not, in my eyes, a “stupid fanboy battle” this is a select group of publishers very clearly stating that they do not, and will not stand for, someone else collecting money in their name without entering an agreement with that person first. The only reason that Instapaper is mentioned is because it is a popular competing service that does not commit this egregious act of collecting money in the name of others.
The way I see it: this is akin to emailing someone asking for permission and stating in the email that you will assume permission is granted if no response is received. Again, this is a bullshit move.
Dash goes on to list out some of the arguments and here’s what he lists as one of the “debatable” issues:
> Apps like Readability offer a system where a subscription payment holds the majority of its revenues (in their case, 70%) for publishers, but requires the publisher to register with the app in order to receive their payment. Some people consider this objectionable because it’s opt-out instead of opt-in for the publishers, and because it’s not clear enough what happens to unclaimed payments.
Firstly, it’s not clear at all what happens to the unclaimed money. I have heard it was intended to be donated to a literacy charity and if that is really the case, how hard is that to setup and write a blog post about? Secondly, it’s not just that the system is opt-out, it’s that unless the publisher opts out the user has no way of knowing if their money is actually going to the site they hope it is going to.
This isn’t so much an issue for sites like the New York Times, but imagine if a reader only reads two sites and wants to contribute to them, but neither site is signed up, or opted-out. The reader has no way of knowing this, but every month has to pay the subscription — where is that money going and why not tell the reader if a site is signed up?
>I saw a number of critical posts which (falsely) described Readability as “VC-backed” or as a “big company” swooping in on the little guy.
I’ll take ownership of making that mistake and I do apologize for alleging that Readability was VC-backed.
Lastly Dash alleges:
> Because if we succeed in vilifying Readability for trying to figure out a publisher payment model, Instapaper is going to go down with it for charging for its app. If we succeed in attacking Instapaper for providing ad-free views of content within its app, Readability is going to go down with it.
I agree with the latter statement, but the former makes no sense to me. How is Instapaper hurt if Readability’s business model doesn’t work — they are two separate and distinctly different business models.
This is a long post on a subject that many of you are losing interest in (I am sure), but the fact is that the argument keeps getting twisted.
There is one major argument: We do not want Readability collecting money in our name, without our permission.
I can’t say it any more clear.
Lastly, there’s two questions that I feel Readability must answer:
1. Why does Readability feel it is OK to collect money in another’s name without that persons permission?
2. What, specifically, happens to the unclaimed money?I think users and publishers deserve answers to both of those questions.
UPDATE: I missed [this post where Readability CEO Rich Ziade](http://curiousrat.com/home/2012/4/2/interview-with-readability-ceo-richard-ziade.html) states that all unclaimed money thus far is still in an escrow account. That’s great, but doesn’t change the fact that we don’t know what will happen to that money.
UPDATED 2: [At some point Readability did add a check mark to indicated sites that are “signed up” to get payments](http://twitter.com/chartier/status/186908355737042944). That’s a very welcomed feature.
-
‘RIM’S Future: Dead, Alive, Reborn?’
Jean-Louis Gassée on RIM: >Of course, there is one intriguing possibility left: Microsoft could do to RIM what it did to Nokia. They could convince RIM to abandon its unlikely-to-succeed “native” software effort and become the second prong in Microsoft’s effort to regain significance in the smartphone wars. We can picture the headlines: RIM Joins…
Jean-Louis Gassée on RIM:
>Of course, there is one intriguing possibility left: Microsoft could do to RIM what it did to Nokia. They could convince RIM to abandon its unlikely-to-succeed “native” software effort and become the second prong in Microsoft’s effort to regain significance in the smartphone wars. We can picture the headlines: RIM Joins Nokia in Adopting Windows Phone, Microsoft Now Firmly Back in the Race…I think the smart move for RIM is to forget about devices and create apps for Windows Phone, Android, and iOS. You have your BlackBerry app that ties into your secure corporate server where your email, contacts, BBM, and calendars await you. Yeah, I wouldn’t use it, but I bet RIM could convince security conscious companies that this is a “smart move”.
I think Gassée is right when he speculates that no one is going to buy RIM for their patents — and at this rate why buy them at all?
-
Fools of the Year
I think Lyons should be a bit higher, but that’s just nit-picking.
I think Lyons should be a bit higher, but that’s just nit-picking.